Literature DB >> 23544691

Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients.

Joshua D Harris1, Frank M McCormick, Geoffrey D Abrams, Anil K Gupta, Thomas J Ellis, Bernard R Bach, Charles A Bush-Joseph, Shane J Nho.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy.
METHODS: A systematic review of multiple medical databases was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and checklist. All clinical outcome studies that reported the presence or absence of complications and/or reoperations were eligible for inclusion. Length of follow-up was not an exclusion criterion. Complication and reoperation rates were extracted from each study. Duplicate patient populations within separate distinct publications were analyzed and reported only once.
RESULTS: Ninety-two studies (6,134 participants) were included. Most were Level IV evidence studies (88%) with short-term follow-up (mean 2.0 years). Labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) were the 2 most common diagnoses treated, and labral treatment and acetabuloplasty/femoral osteochondroplasty were the 2 most common surgical techniques reported. Overall, major and minor complication rates were 0.58% and 7.5%, respectively. Iatrogenic chondrolabral injury and temporary neuropraxia were the 2 most common minor complications. The overall reoperation rate was 6.3%, occurring at a mean of 16 months. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) was the most common reoperation. The conversion rate to THA was 2.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of major complications was 0.58% after hip arthroscopy. The reoperation rate was 6.3%, and the most common reason for reoperation was conversion to THA. Minor complications and the reoperation rate are directly related to the learning curve of hip arthroscopy. As surgical indications evolve, patient selection should limit the number of cases that would have been converted to THA. Similarly, the number of minor complications is directly related to technical aspects of the procedure and therefore will decrease with surgeon experience and improvement in instrumentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, a systematic review of Level I to IV studies.
Copyright © 2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23544691     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  102 in total

Review 1.  Approach to a Failed Hip Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Michelle E Arakgi; Ryan M Degen
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-06

2.  Hip Arthroscopy for Removal of an Acetabular Rim-Based Osteoid Osteoma and Concomitant Femoroacetabular Impingement Correction.

Authors:  Jacques A Denker; Hollis M Fritts; Rebecca M Stone; Christopher M Larson
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-10-24

Review 3.  Advances in arthroscopy-indications and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Andrew J Carr; Andrew J Price; Sion Glyn-Jones; Jonathan L Rees
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  An arthroscopic safety zone for the medial compartment of the hip joint.

Authors:  Je-Hun Lee; Jung-Bum Lee; Nam Seob Lee; Seung Yun Han; In-Beom Kim; Seung-Ho Han
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  CORR Insights®: What Factors Predict Conversion to THA After Arthroscopy?

Authors:  Brian T Barlow
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Postoperative imaging in arthroscopic hip surgery.

Authors:  F Di Pietto; V Chianca; R de Ritis; E Cesarano; A Reginelli; A Barile; M Zappia; L Ginolfi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-02-16

7.  Complications in Hip Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Naoki Nakano; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-12-21

8.  The Quebec City Slider: A Technique for Capsular Closure and Plication in Hip Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Travis J Menge; Jorge Chahla; Eduardo Soares; Justin J Mitchell; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-08-29

9.  Basic Hip Arthroscopy: Supine Patient Positioning and Dynamic Fluoroscopic Evaluation.

Authors:  Sandeep Mannava; Elizabeth A Howse; Austin V Stone; Allston J Stubbs
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-08-24

10.  Is the Actual Failure Rate of Hip Arthroscopy Higher Than Most Published Series? An Analysis of a Private Insurance Database.

Authors:  Jacqueline E Baron; Robert W Westermann; Nicholas A Bedard; Michael C Willey; T S Lynch; Kyle R Duchman
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.