Eric N Bowman1, Justin D Hallock1, Thomas W Throckmorton1, Fredrick M Azar2. 1. Department of Orthopaedics & Biomedical Engineering, Campbell Clinic - University of Tennessee, 1211 Union Ave. Suite 510, Memphis, TN, 38104, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedics & Biomedical Engineering, Campbell Clinic - University of Tennessee, 1211 Union Ave. Suite 510, Memphis, TN, 38104, USA. fazar@campbellclinic.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify patient and treatment factors that predict a favourable response to intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) treatment to better guide patient and treatment selection. METHODS: This prospective, observational study evaluated patients with mild-to-moderate (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1-3) primary knee osteoarthritis treated between March 2013 and May 2016. Patient function and pain scores were assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (WOMAC/KOOS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) surveys, with response to treatment defined according to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) 2004 criteria. Surveys were completed at each injection and three months post-treatment. Patients were followed an average of 27 months. RESULTS: Of 102 patients, 57% had a positive response. Those at least twice as likely to respond were patients with grades 1-2 osteoarthritis or a positive response to the first injection and those who were ≥60 years. Gender, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, HA brand, and initial VAS and WOMAC/KOOS scores were not significant predictors of success. Mean time to arthroplasty following injection series was 11 months (30% of nonresponders, 12% of responders). The VAS strongly correlated with KOOS pain scores and successful outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients with mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis (grades 1-2) and those responding positively to the first injection were twice as likely to respond positively to the injection series, as were patients ≥60 years. Patients who did not respond positively were more likely to proceed to arthroplasty. The VAS appears to be a reliable method of defining and monitoring treatment success. Judicious patient selection and counseling may improve outcomes associated with intra-articular HA injections.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify patient and treatment factors that predict a favourable response to intra-articularhyaluronic acid (HA) treatment to better guide patient and treatment selection. METHODS: This prospective, observational study evaluated patients with mild-to-moderate (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 1-3) primary knee osteoarthritis treated between March 2013 and May 2016. Patient function and pain scores were assessed by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (WOMAC/KOOS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) surveys, with response to treatment defined according to the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) 2004 criteria. Surveys were completed at each injection and three months post-treatment. Patients were followed an average of 27 months. RESULTS: Of 102 patients, 57% had a positive response. Those at least twice as likely to respond were patients with grades 1-2 osteoarthritis or a positive response to the first injection and those who were ≥60 years. Gender, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, HA brand, and initial VAS and WOMAC/KOOS scores were not significant predictors of success. Mean time to arthroplasty following injection series was 11 months (30% of nonresponders, 12% of responders). The VAS strongly correlated with KOOS pain scores and successful outcomes. CONCLUSION:Patients with mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis (grades 1-2) and those responding positively to the first injection were twice as likely to respond positively to the injection series, as were patients ≥60 years. Patients who did not respond positively were more likely to proceed to arthroplasty. The VAS appears to be a reliable method of defining and monitoring treatment success. Judicious patient selection and counseling may improve outcomes associated with intra-articularHA injections.
Authors: Joanne M Jordan; Charles G Helmick; Jordan B Renner; Gheorghe Luta; Anca D Dragomir; Janice Woodard; Fang Fang; Todd A Schwartz; Lauren M Abbate; Leigh F Callahan; William D Kalsbeek; Marc C Hochberg Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Kevin L Ong; Allen F Anderson; Faizan Niazi; Anke L Fierlinger; Steven M Kurtz; Roy D Altman Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Jasmin Arrich; Franz Piribauer; Philipp Mad; Daniela Schmid; Klaus Klaushofer; Marcus Müllner Journal: CMAJ Date: 2005-04-12 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Reva C Lawrence; David T Felson; Charles G Helmick; Lesley M Arnold; Hyon Choi; Richard A Deyo; Sherine Gabriel; Rosemarie Hirsch; Marc C Hochberg; Gene G Hunder; Joanne M Jordan; Jeffrey N Katz; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Frederick Wolfe Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-01
Authors: M E Adams; M H Atkinson; A J Lussier; J I Schulz; K A Siminovitch; J P Wade; M Zummer Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Roy Altman; Michael Fredericson; Samir K Bhattacharyya; Brad Bisson; Thomas Abbott; Sashidhar Yadalam; Myoung Kim Journal: J Knee Surg Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Ellen M Selten; Johanna E Vriezekolk; Rinie Geenen; Willemijn H van der Laan; Roelien G van der Meulen-Dilling; Marc W Nijhof; Henk J Schers; Cornelia H van den Ende Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Ahmed Samir Barakat; Nour Muhamad Ibrahim; Osama Elghobashy; Ahmed Maher Sultan; Khaled F M Abdel-Kader Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2019-06-22 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Michael T Hirschmann; Niklaus F Friederich; Roland Becker; Jon Karlsson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Angelo Boffa; Davide Previtali; Giorgio Di Laura Frattura; Francesca Vannini; Christian Candrian; Giuseppe Filardo Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Oğuz Kaya; Ahmet Şenel; Ömer Cihan Batur; Nevzat Gönder; Emre Ergen; Barış Peker Journal: Indian J Orthop Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 1.033