Literature DB >> 2929965

[Early prognosis in severe cranio-cerebral trauma using the Glasgow Coma Score and evoked potentials].

B Riffel1, M Stöhr, W Graser, E Trost, H Baumgärtner.   

Abstract

During 72 h following severe head injury, 103 patients in acute posttraumatic coma were assessed by clinical examinations (documented by Glasgow Coma Score) and brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) as well as short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) following median-nerve stimulation. Patient outcomes were classified at 6 months or more according to the following categories: good recovery, severely disabled or vegetative, and brain dead. Patients who had died of systemic complications (pneumonia, septicemia, renal failure, etc.) were excluded from the study. The Glasgow Coma Score was reliable in forecasting a favorable outcome; all patients with a Score over 9 points had a good recovery. The Glasgow Coma Score was not reliable in predicting an unfavorable outcome, however; some patients with the lowest possible Glasgow Coma Score (3 points) at the early clinical examination survived with good recovery. The BAEPs were reliable predictors of an unfavorable outcome; the outcome was unfavorable when a missing wave V or more missing waves pointed toward a secondary brainstem lesion. Normal BAEPs were not reliable, however, in predicting a favorable outcome. SEP data served as a prognostic indicator of unfavorable as well as favorable outcomes. In summary, evoked potentials add valuable information to the clinical examination in assessing a patient's outcome after severe head injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2929965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  6 in total

1.  Initial predictive factors of outcome in severe non-accidental head trauma in children.

Authors:  Didier Scavarda; Charline Gabaudan; Fabrice Ughetto; Frederic Lamy; Vanessa Imada; Gabriel Lena; Olivier Paut
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Are somatosensory evoked potentials the best predictor of outcome after severe brain injury? A systematic review.

Authors:  B G Carter; W Butt
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  [Value of early somatosensory evoked potentials in intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with craniocerebral trauma].

Authors:  E Maurer; P Milewski; C Ulrich
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in coma: analysis and relation to clinical status and outcome.

Authors:  Z Ying; U D Schmid; J Schmid; C W Hess
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 5.  [Coma. The prognostic value of evoked potentials in patients after traumatic brain injury].

Authors:  M H Morgalla; J Bauer; R Ritz; M Tatagiba
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Can a clinician predict the technical equipment a patient will need during intensive care unit treatment? An approach to standardize and redesign the intensive care unit workstation.

Authors:  J Hähnel; W Friesdorf; B Schwilk; T Marx; S Blessing
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1992-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.