| Literature DB >> 29299284 |
Taha Soliman1,2, Walid Aly2, Reda M Fahim2, Michael L Berumen3, Holger Jenke-Kodama1, Giacomo Bernardi4.
Abstract
Recently, tilapia have become increasingly important in aquaculture and fisheries worldwide. They are one of the major protein sources in many African countries and are helping to combat malnutrition. Therefore, maintenance and conservation genetics of wild populations of tilapia are of great significance. In this study, we report the population genetic structure and genetic diversity of the redbelly tilapia (Coptodon zillii) in three different Egyptian aquatic environments: brackish (Lake Idku), marine (Al-Max Bay), and freshwater (Lake Nasser). The habitat differences, environmental factors, and harvesting pressures are the main characteristics of the sampling sites. Three mitochondrial DNA markers (COI: cytochrome oxidase subunit I; the D-loop; CYTB: cytochrome b) were used to assess population structure differences among the three populations. The population at Lake Nasser presented the highest genetic diversity (Hd = 0.8116, H = 6), and the marine population of Al-Max Bay the lowest (Hd = 0.2391, H = 4) of the combined sequences. In addition, the phylogenetic haplotype network showed private haplotypes in each environmental habitat. Results presented here will be useful in aquaculture to introduce the appropriate broodstock for future aquaculture strategies of C. zillii. In addition, evidence of population structure may contribute to the management of tilapia fisheries in Egyptian waters.Entities:
Keywords: aquaculture introduction; genetic diversity; mtDNA; redbelly tilapia; saltwater adaptation
Year: 2017 PMID: 29299284 PMCID: PMC5743693 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Image of fresh specimen (15 cm) of Coptodon zillii (Gervais, 1848)
Genetic diversity indices and neutrality test (Fu's F ) of Coptodon zillii from different Egyptian aquatic habitats
| Location | Salinity (%) |
|
|
| 5 | π | Fu's | Fu's |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COI | ||||||||
| Lake Idku | 1.5–3 | 48 | 5 | 0.7048 | 5 | 0.0025 | 1.3539 | 0.7810 |
| Al‐Max Bay | 32 | 24 | 3 | 0.1630 | 4 | 0.0006 | −0.4623 | 0.2530 |
| Lake Nasser | <0.5 | 24 | 4 | 0.5978 | 4 | 0.0019 | 0.7482 | 0.6760 |
| D‐loop | ||||||||
| Lake Idku | 1.5–3 | 48 | 4 | 0.2642 | 4 | 0.0011 | −1.4012 | 0.1610 |
| Al‐Max Bay | 32 | 24 | 3 | 0.2355 | 4 | 0.0014 | 0.1407 | 0.4220 |
| Lake Nasser | <0.5 | 24 | 4 | 0.7717 | 5 | 0.0046 | 1.9357 | 0.8480 |
| CYTB | ||||||||
| Lake Idku | 1.5–3 | 48 | 3 | 0.2651 | 2 | 0.0006 | −0.8041 | 0.2130 |
| Al‐Max Bay | 32 | 24 | 1 | 0.0000 | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | N.A. |
| Lake Nasser | <0.5 | 24 | 1 | 0.0000 | 0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | N.A. |
| Combined | ||||||||
| Lake Idku | 1.5–3 | 48 | 11 | 0.7917 | 11 | 0.0015 | −2.1651 | 0.1780 |
| Al‐Max Bay | 32 | 24 | 4 | 0.2391 | 8 | 0.0006 | 0.1130 | 0.4970 |
| Lake Nasser | <0.5 | 24 | 6 | 0.8116 | 9 | 0.0021 | 1.4736 | 0.8170 |
(N) Sample size, (H) number of haplotypes, (H ) haplotype diversity, (S) number of segregating sites, (π) nucleotide diversity; p < 0.05.
Figure 2Map showing sampling sites of Coptodon zillii from three different types of Egyptian aquatic habitats. The pie charts represent the distribution of haplotypes of combined sequences of all loci (All), cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI), D‐loop region, and cytochrome b (CYTB), as defined by Figure 2 and Table 1
Figure 3Median‐joining haplotype network inferred from mtDNA (a) D‐loop region, (b) cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) and (c) cytochrome b (CYTB) sequences of Coptodon zillii from different Egyptian localities. Each circle represents a different haplotype. The size of a circle is proportional to the frequency of each haplotype
Figure 4Median‐joining haplotype network inferred from mtDNA combined sequences for all loci (D‐loop region, cytochrome oxidase subunit I, and cytochrome b) of Coptodon zillii from different Egyptian habitats. Each circle represents a different haplotype. The size of a circle is proportional to the frequency of each haplotype
ΦST pairwise inferred from mtDNA COI (below diagonal), D‐loop (above diagonal), CYTB (below diagonal), and combined sequences (above diagonal) among different Egyptian populations of Coptodon zillii
| Lake Idku | Al‐Max Bay | Lake Nasser | |
|---|---|---|---|
| COI and D‐loop | |||
| Lake Idku | 0.0000 |
|
|
| Al‐Max Bay |
| 0.0000 |
|
| Lake Nasser |
|
| 0.0000 |
| CYTB and combined | |||
| Lake Idku | 0.0000 |
|
|
| Al‐Max Bay | 0.0853 | 0.0000 |
|
| Lake Nasser | 0.0853 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |
Significant values in bold (p < 0.05).