| Literature DB >> 29299061 |
Yongil Yang1, Chang Geun Yoo1,2, Kimberly A Winkeler3, Cassandra M Collins3, Maud A W Hinchee3, Sara S Jawdy1, Lee E Gunter1, Nancy L Engle1, Yunqiao Pu1,2, Xiaohan Yang1, Timothy J Tschaplinski1, Arthur J Ragauskas1,2,4,5, Gerald A Tuskan1,6, Jin-Gui Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Domain of Unknown Function 231-containing proteins (DUF231) are plant specific and their function is largely unknown. Studies in the model plants Arabidopsis and rice suggested that some DUF231 proteins act in the process of O-acetyl substitution of hemicellulose and esterification of pectin. However, little is known about the function of DUF231 proteins in woody plant species.Entities:
Keywords: Acetylation; Cell wall; Cellulose; DUF231; Populus; Sugar release; Xylan
Year: 2017 PMID: 29299061 PMCID: PMC5744390 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-0998-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Bioinformatics analysis of DUF231-containing proteins in Arabidopsis and Populus. a Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Arabidopsis and Populus DUF231-containing proteins. The numbers at the branches denote bootstrap confidence values. Note that 48 of the 52 PtDUF231 proteins share each node with Arabidopsis DUF231 proteins (red arrows mark four PtDUF231 proteins that are not shared a node with Arabidopsis DUF231 proteins). The location of PtDUF231A (Potri.009G072800) is indicated in the PMR5 clade by a blue asterisk. b Amino acid sequence alignment by MUSCLE. Note that PtDUF231A (Potri.009G072800) shows 52.5% amino acid identity with Arabidopsis PMR5 and 55.9% identity with TBL45. The closest paralog for PtDUF231A is PtDUF231B (Potri.001G278300) with 89.4% identity at the amino acid level. Blue lined brackets shown in the left illustrate the phylogenic tree as shown in a. Red horizontal box marks the amino acid alignment of PtDUF231A-containing node. Blue arrow points Potri.001G010900 which contains both TBL and DUF231 domains but without N-terminal sequences. Three well-conserved protein domains including TM, TBL, and DUF231 are indicated in boxes. c Diagram of amino acid sequence alignment of TBL and DUF231 domains among PtDUF231A, its Populus paralog, its Arabidopsis ortholog (PMR5) and TBL45, in the node shown in b. Consensus sequence was defined by 50% threshold of amino acid sequence identity. The upper panel shows sequence identity using different colors (yellow: over 50%, red: 100% conserved). All conserved regions including GDSL are indicated by the black box. Note that the TBL and DUF231 domains are highly conserved in the PdDUF231A protein
Fig. 2Expression pattern of PdDUF231A across various tissues and organs. Shown are qRT-PCR analysis using gene-specific primers for PdDUF231A (Potri.009G072800) and its paralog PdDUF231B (Potri.001G278300). The PdUBCc (Populus UBIQUITIN C) was used as an internal control. The relative expression range in each tissue/organ was determined by comparing expression level of senescent leaf (set as 1). Shown are mean values ± standard deviation (SD) of three technical replicates
Fig. 3Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the expression of PdDUF231A in Populus transgenic lines. a Diagram illustrating the gene construct used to generate OXPdDUF231A transgenic lines. b PdDUF231A expression in OXPdDUF231A transgenic lines. The cDNA generated from total RNA of scrapped xylem tissue was used for qRT-PCR. The PdUBCc (Populus UBIQUITIN C) was used as an internal control. Two independent PdDUF231A overexpression lines were examined, together with the wild-type WV94 and the empty vector control K-147. Statistical analysis was performed with three replicates in two different plants per individual transgenic line (n = 6). Asterisk indicates statistical significance compared to WV94 (p < 0.01)
Fig. 4Carbohydrate and gene expression analyses in OXPdDUF231A transgenic lines. Two independent OXPdDUF231A transgenic lines (OXPdDUF231A-1 and OXPdDUF231A-2), WV94 (wild type) and K-147 (empty vector control) were grown under greenhouse conditions. a Monosaccharide composition analysis. The monosaccharide composition was determined by ion chromatography after a two-step acid treatment. b Cellulose content analysis by anthrone dye staining. c Relative gene expression of cellulose biosynthesis-related genes in leaf and xylem. Shown are the mean value ± SD of three technical repeats of three biological replicates of leaf or xylem (n = 9). Asterisks indicate statistical significance compared to WV94 (p < 0.01)
Fig. 5Lignin content and enzymatic saccharification assay of OXPdDUF231A transgenic plants. Dried Populus stem after debarking was subjected for lignin content measurement and saccharification analysis. a Lignin content of dried stem, b glucose yield based on total glucose content in each plant. X axis denotes enzymatic hydrolysis time. Each data point represents average value of two biological replicates ± SD. Asterisks indicate statistical significance compared to WV94 (p < 0.05)
Fig. 6Integration analysis of xylan acetylation in OXPdDUF231A transgenic lines. a Target chemical structure detected by 13C-1H 2D HSQC NMR. b The NMR spectra from cell wall gels. Five different spectral types including 2-O-acetylated (2-O-AcXyl), 3-O-acetylated (3-O-AcXyl), 2,3-di-O-acetylated (2,3,-di-AcXyl), 4-O-methyl-alpha-d-glucuronic acid (4-O-Me-GlcA) and xylan backbone ((1-4)-β-d-Xylp) were detected in this NMR analysis. The resonance peaks of lignin were also assigned together here; LA β-aryl ether (β-O-4), LA-H/Gβ β-aryl ether (β-O-4-H/G), LA-Sβ β-aryl ether (β-O-4-S), LC resinol (β-β). The acetylated and non-acetylated xylan resonance peaks were used to perform integration analysis. c The relative integration result of acetylated groups and non-acetylated xylan. Note that 3-O-AcXyl and 2,3-di-O-AcXyl were increased in OXPdDUF231A transgenic lines. Shown are the mean values of two biological replicates each line ± SD
Fig. 7Stem volume of OXPdDUF231A transgenic plants. a Whole plant images of 6-month-old OXPdDUF231A plants grown under greenhouse conditions (bar = 30 cm). b Comparison of estimated stem volume between OXPdDUF231A transgenic plants and WV94 control. The stem volume was estimated by using the πr 2 h equation with height and diameter of primary stem. Shown are the average values of calculated stem cylinder volumes ± SD (n = 3)
List of metabolites with increased content (µg/g FW sorbitol equivalents) in leaf tissues of 6-month-old greenhouse-grown OXPdDUF231A versus K-147 plants
| Metabolite [retention time (min); key |
|
| K-147 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fold change |
| Avg | sem | Avg | sem | |
| 19.63 171 Feruloyl-caffeoyl glycoside | #DIV/0! | 0.282 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
| 17.04 354 Guaiacyl lignan | #DIV/0! | 0.094 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
| 17.33 354 Syringyl lignan glycoside | #DIV/0! | 0.081 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
| 18.48 Feruloyl-caffeoyl-shikimate glycoside | 59.16 | 0.083 | 15.2 | 5.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 13.27 235 Xylopyranoside | 30.75 | 0.001 | 2685.9 | 330.7 | 87.3 | 15.0 |
| 1,5-Dicaffeoyl-shikimate | 25.92 | 0.008 | 99.0 | 17.9 | 3.8 | 0.3 |
| 21.01 557 193 647 Glycoside | 15.61 | 0.252 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 13.63 278 309 227 | 11.67 | 0.002 | 7.6 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| 18.43 616 386 Caffeoyl-shikimate glycoside conjugate | 9.61 | 0.243 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Syringin | 9.06 | 0.199 | 13.7 | 5.9 | 1.5 | 0.1 |
| 1,2,3-Benzenetriol | 5.42 | 0.002 | 15.2 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 0.5 |
| Raffinose | 4.75 | 0.066 | 86.6 | 21.4 | 18.2 | 4.0 |
| Maleic acid | 3.49 | 0.028 | 406.5 | 69.4 | 116.5 | 38.4 |
| Erythronic acid | 3.46 | 0.046 | 42.4 | 8.5 | 12.2 | 1.0 |
| 18.11 235 Phenolic glycoside | 3.46 | 0.263 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Salicyl alcohol | 3.38 | 0.020 | 113.5 | 18.1 | 33.5 | 5.3 |
| Galactinol | 3.25 | 0.160 | 74.7 | 22.4 | 23 | 4.1 |
| 12.81 539 359 320 | 3.23 | 0.026 | 15.1 | 2.5 | 4.7 | 0.3 |
Metabolites were analyzed as trimethylsilyl derivatives by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Data are the average (avg) and standard error of the mean (sem) of six OXPdDUF231A plants (three plants from each of two independent transgenic lines) and three K-147 control plants. Unknown and partially identified metabolites are designated by retention time, key mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios, and identified moieties. #DIV/0! represents an integration area divided by zero (absence)
List of metabolites with decreased content (µg/g FW sorbitol equivalents) in leaf tissues of 6-month-old greenhouse-grown OXPdDUF231A versus K-147 plants
| Metabolite [retention time (min); key |
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fold change |
| Avg | sem | Avg | sem | |
| Iminodiacetic acid | 0.02 | 0.003 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 188.2 | 63.6 |
| Asparagine | 0.03 | 0.000 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 68.5 | 14.7 |
| 10.84 158 200 302 | 0.03 | 0.000 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 21.2 | 2.2 |
| Lysine | 0.03 | 0.003 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 90.7 | 29.9 |
| Ornithine | 0.04 | 0.000 | 50.1 | 35.3 | 1290.1 | 170.1 |
| Rutin | 0.04 | 0.000 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 12.8 | 2.6 |
| Luteolin | 0.05 | 0.004 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 11.4 | 3.9 |
| 17.80 501 559 471 Flavonoid | 0.06 | 0.005 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 21.2 | 7.4 |
| 7.92 218 231 | 0.06 | 0.000 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 4.7 | 0.6 |
| 13.75 219 Coumaroyl glycoside | 0.07 | 0.001 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 17.6 | 4.3 |
| 9.49 302 316 288 242 208 | 0.07 | 0.000 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 68.5 | 11.6 |
| α-Keto-glutaric acid | 0.08 | 0.000 | 9.7 | 2.3 | 114.7 | 14.5 |
| 1,6-Anhydroglucose | 0.08 | 0.000 | 16.7 | 3.0 | 209.7 | 37.7 |
| Oxalomalic acid | 0.08 | 0.000 | 7.5 | 1.3 | 96.6 | 17.6 |
| Glutamine | 0.08 | 0.001 | 6.8 | 1.8 | 90.3 | 24.4 |
| 14.11 521 171 289 Glycoside | 0.09 | 0.013 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 20.0 | 8.2 |
| 3-Amino-2-piperidone | 0.09 | 0.007 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 39.8 | 12.9 |
| 10.58 315 330 200 172 | 0.09 | 0.000 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 14.3 | 2.0 |
| 10.15 368 353 271 242 184 | 0.09 | 0.000 | 6.4 | 2.4 | 71.1 | 10.9 |
| 8.99 242 257 99 | 0.10 | 0.003 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 22.0 | 6.7 |
Metabolites were analyzed as trimethylsilyl derivatives by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Data are the average (avg) and standard error of the mean (sem) of six OXPdDUF231A plants (three plants from each of two independent transgenic lines) and three K-147 control plants. Unknown and partially identified metabolites are designated by retention time, key mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios, and identified moieties