Literature DB >> 29298531

An appropriate way to predict fetal gender at first trimester: anogenital distance.

Mehmet Sipahi1, Vehbi Yavuz Tokgöz1, Şebnem Alanya Tosun1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using anogenital distance to determine fetal sex is a new method. There is only one study in the literature. We predict that it will pass through the literature as a new method that can be used in determining fetal sex especially in first trimester.
INTRODUCTION: Determination of fetal gender before birth has been a matter of curiosity for both the family and the clinician. In the presence of gender-linked genetic disease, it becomes an obligation instead of an interest. The aim of this study was to determine the fetal gender accurately at first trimester with anogenital distance (AGD) and to investigate the correlations of nuchal translucency (NT), fetal heart rate (FHR), and crown-rump length (CRL) with AGD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study, AGD measurement was performed in 111 patients with singleton pregnancy from 11 to 13 weeks and 6 days (CRL 45-84 mm). Measurements of AGD ≥4.8 mm were identified for males, and AGD <4.8 mm for females.
RESULTS: Genders were demonstrated accurately for males as 76.7% and for females as 97.1%. The mean value of AGD was 3.6 mm for females and 5.1 mm for males. There were no relations between fetal gender and FHR and also NT.
CONCLUSIONS: Gender can be detected with great accuracy in gestations between 11 to 13 weeks and 6 days by using AGD. CRL and gestational week (GW) were determined as nonsignificant predictors of fetal gender by AGD measurement. In order to obtain more accurate results with AGD, consideration of further studies with larger series in different races is recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anogenital distance; crown–rump length; fetal gender; fetal heart rate; first trimester

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29298531     DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1424131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  4 in total

1.  Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Quantification System.

Authors:  María Luisa Sánchez-Ferrer; María Teresa Prieto-Sánchez; Carlos Moya-Jiménez; Jaime Mendiola; Carmen María García-Hernández; Ana Carmona-Barnosi; Anibal Nieto; Alberto M Torres-Cantero
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Predictive value and reference ranges of anogenital distance for determining fetal gender in the first trimester: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Alfuraih; Samiah A Alotaiby; Mohammed J Alsaadi; Hanifa A Bukhari; Ali M Aldhebaib; Rafat S Mohtasib
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.422

Review 3.  Androgens and the masculinization programming window: human-rodent differences.

Authors:  Richard M Sharpe
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.407

4.  A Systematic Review of Anogenital Distance and Gynecological Disorders: Endometriosis and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Zhenyan Pan; Fangfang Zhu; Kai Zhou
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 5.555

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.