Literature DB >> 29298235

Recipient Selection for Optimal Utilization of Discarded Grafts in Liver Transplantation.

Giovanni Giretti1, Louise Barbier1,2,3, Petru Bucur1,2,3, Frédéric Marques1,2,3, Jean-Marc Perarnau4, Martine Ferrandière5, Anne-Charlotte Tellier5, Vincent Kerouredan5, Mario Altieri6, Xavier Causse3,7, Maryline Debette-Gratien3,8,9, Christine Silvain3,10, Ephrem Salamé1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In France, liver grafts that have been refused by at least 5 teams are considered for rescue allocation (RA), with the choice of the recipient being at the team's discretion. Although this system permits the use of otherwise discarded grafts in a context of organ shortage, outcomes and potential benefits need to be assessed.
METHODS: Between 2011 and 2015, outcomes of RA grafts (n = 33) were compared with SA grafts (n = 321) at a single French center.
RESULTS: Liver grafts in the RA group were older (63 ± 17 years vs 54 ± 18 years, P = 0.007) and had a higher DRI (1.86 ± 0.45 vs 1.61 ± 0.47, P = 0.010). Recipients in this group had a lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (14 ± 5 vs 22 ± 10, P < 0.001) and had mostly hepatocellular carcinoma (67.0% vs 40.4%, P = 0.010). The balance of risk score was significantly lower in the RA group (5.5 ± 2.9 vs 9.2 ± 5.5, P < 0.001). There were higher rates of early and delayed hepatic artery thrombosis (15.2% vs 3.1%, P = 0.001) and retransplantation (18.2% vs 4.7%, P = 0.002) in the RA group. Patient survival was not different between groups, but graft survival was impaired (95% vs 82% at 1 year and 94% vs 74% at 3 years, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our results show that discarded liver grafts can be used provided that there is a strict recipient selection process, although hepatic artery thrombosis and retransplantation are more frequent. This strategy enables utilization of otherwise discarded grafts in the context of organ shortage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29298235     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  4 in total

1.  Should we use liver grafts repeatedly refused by other transplant teams?

Authors:  Audrey Winter; Paul Landais; Daniel Azoulay; Mara Disabato; Philippe Compagnon; Corinne Antoine; Christian Jacquelinet; Jean-Pierre Daurès; Cyrille Féray
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2020-05-04

2.  Machine Learning Prediction of Liver Allograft Utilization From Deceased Organ Donors Using the National Donor Management Goals Registry.

Authors:  Andrew M Bishara; Dmytro S Lituiev; Dieter Adelmann; Rishi P Kothari; Darren J Malinoski; Jacob D Nudel; Mitchell B Sally; Ryutaro Hirose; Dexter D Hadley; Claus U Niemann
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-09-27

3.  Endogenous Interleukin-33 Acts as an Alarmin in Liver Ischemia-Reperfusion and Is Associated With Injury After Human Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Louise Barbier; Aurélie Robin; Rémy Sindayigaya; Héloïse Ducousso; Fanny Dujardin; Antoine Thierry; Thierry Hauet; Jean-Philippe Girard; Luc Pellerin; Jean-Marc Gombert; André Herbelin; Ephrem Salamé
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 4.  Feasibility of using marginal liver grafts in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Xiang Lan; Hua Zhang; Hong-Yu Li; Ke-Fei Chen; Fei Liu; Yong-Gang Wei; Bo Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.