PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether naturally occurring changes in intrinsic motivation, behavioral regulation, and goals mitigate declining physical activity among adolescents. METHODS: Latent growth modeling was applied in tests of change in intrinsic motivation, facets of behavioral regulation, and their interactions with goals on change in physical activity measured by accelerometer in a cohort of 260 boys and girls evaluated longitudinally from sixth through ninth grades. RESULTS: Physical activity declined less in youths who maintained higher intrinsic motivation or integrated regulation, but only when they maintained higher enjoyment goal compared with other students. Physical activity also declined less in students who maintained higher intrinsic motivation or integrated motivation and had bigger declines in appearance goal (or social and competence goals with intrinsic motivation) compared with students who maintained higher levels of those goals. The interactions correspond to 1 to 2 min·h less decrease in physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with Self-Determination Theory, the findings encourage interventions that target autonomous motivation among youths. The results extend prior evidence in three ways. First, the cohort was tracked for 3 yr using an objective measure of physical activity. Second, influences of intrinsic motivation and integrated regulation on changing physical activity were not direct. They interacted with changing goals, indicating that interventions should also focus on specific goals for physical activity as effect modifiers. Third, interventions focused on autonomous motivation should consider that controlled, introjected motivation may also interact with goals to influence physical activity during the transition between middle school and high school.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether naturally occurring changes in intrinsic motivation, behavioral regulation, and goals mitigate declining physical activity among adolescents. METHODS: Latent growth modeling was applied in tests of change in intrinsic motivation, facets of behavioral regulation, and their interactions with goals on change in physical activity measured by accelerometer in a cohort of 260 boys and girls evaluated longitudinally from sixth through ninth grades. RESULTS: Physical activity declined less in youths who maintained higher intrinsic motivation or integrated regulation, but only when they maintained higher enjoyment goal compared with other students. Physical activity also declined less in students who maintained higher intrinsic motivation or integrated motivation and had bigger declines in appearance goal (or social and competence goals with intrinsic motivation) compared with students who maintained higher levels of those goals. The interactions correspond to 1 to 2 min·h less decrease in physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with Self-Determination Theory, the findings encourage interventions that target autonomous motivation among youths. The results extend prior evidence in three ways. First, the cohort was tracked for 3 yr using an objective measure of physical activity. Second, influences of intrinsic motivation and integrated regulation on changing physical activity were not direct. They interacted with changing goals, indicating that interventions should also focus on specific goals for physical activity as effect modifiers. Third, interventions focused on autonomous motivation should consider that controlled, introjected motivation may also interact with goals to influence physical activity during the transition between middle school and high school.
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Martin S Hagger; Nikos L D Chatzisarantis; Vassilis Barkoukis; John C K Wang; Vello Hein; Maret Pihu; Istvan Soós; Istvan Karsai Journal: J Sport Exerc Psychol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.016
Authors: Sarah E Roth; Monique Gill; Alec M Chan-Golston; Lindsay N Rice; Catherine M Crespi; Deborah Koniak-Griffin; Michael L Prelip Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2019-08-01
Authors: Jimikaye B Courtney; Kaigang Li; Tracy L Nelson; Kayla J Nuss; Denise L Haynie; Ronald J Iannotti; Bruce G Simons-Morton Journal: Psychol Sport Exerc Date: 2021-05-15
Authors: Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Javier Lamoneda; Francisco Javier Huertas-Delgado Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Brigita Mieziene; Arunas Emeljanovas; Ilona Tilindiene; Laura Tumynaite; Laima Trinkuniene; Ichiro Kawachi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Elia C El Hajj; Milad C El Hajj; Brandon Sykes; Melissa Lamicq; Michael R Zile; Robert Malcolm; Patrick M O'Neil; Sheldon E Litwin Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 5.501