BACKGROUND: Despite current therapies, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) often has a devastating outcome. We compared myeloablative CD34+ selected autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with immunosuppression by means of 12 monthly infusions of cyclophosphamide in patients with scleroderma. METHODS: We randomly assigned adults (18 to 69 years of age) with severe scleroderma to undergomyeloablative autologous stem-cell transplantation (36 participants) or to receive cyclophosphamide (39 participants). The primary end point was a global rank composite score comparing participants with each other on the basis of a hierarchy of disease features assessed at 54 months: death, event-free survival (survival without respiratory, renal, or cardiac failure), forced vital capacity, the score on the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire, and the modified Rodnan skin score. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat population, global rank composite scores at 54 months showed the superiority of transplantation (67% of 1404 pairwise comparisons favored transplantation and 33% favored cyclophosphamide, P=0.01). In the per-protocol population (participants who received a transplant or completed ≥9 doses of cyclophosphamide), the rate of event-free survival at 54 months was 79% in the transplantation group and 50% in the cyclophosphamide group (P=0.02). At 72 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival (74% vs. 47%) and overall survival (86% vs. 51%) also favored transplantation (P=0.03 and 0.02, respectively). A total of 9% of the participants in the transplantation group had initiated disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) by 54 months, as compared with 44% of those in the cyclophosphamide group (P=0.001). Treatment-related mortality in the transplantation group was 3% at 54 months and 6% at 72 months, as compared with 0% in the cyclophosphamide group. CONCLUSIONS:Myeloablative autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation achieved long-term benefits in patients with scleroderma, including improved event-free and overall survival, at a cost of increased expected toxicity. Rates of treatment-related death and post-transplantation use of DMARDs were lower than those in previous reports of nonmyeloablative transplantation. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114530 .).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Despite current therapies, diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) often has a devastating outcome. We compared myeloablative CD34+ selected autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with immunosuppression by means of 12 monthly infusions of cyclophosphamide in patients with scleroderma. METHODS: We randomly assigned adults (18 to 69 years of age) with severe scleroderma to undergo myeloablative autologous stem-cell transplantation (36 participants) or to receive cyclophosphamide (39 participants). The primary end point was a global rank composite score comparing participants with each other on the basis of a hierarchy of disease features assessed at 54 months: death, event-free survival (survival without respiratory, renal, or cardiac failure), forced vital capacity, the score on the Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire, and the modified Rodnan skin score. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat population, global rank composite scores at 54 months showed the superiority of transplantation (67% of 1404 pairwise comparisons favored transplantation and 33% favored cyclophosphamide, P=0.01). In the per-protocol population (participants who received a transplant or completed ≥9 doses of cyclophosphamide), the rate of event-free survival at 54 months was 79% in the transplantation group and 50% in the cyclophosphamide group (P=0.02). At 72 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates of event-free survival (74% vs. 47%) and overall survival (86% vs. 51%) also favored transplantation (P=0.03 and 0.02, respectively). A total of 9% of the participants in the transplantation group had initiated disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) by 54 months, as compared with 44% of those in the cyclophosphamide group (P=0.001). Treatment-related mortality in the transplantation group was 3% at 54 months and 6% at 72 months, as compared with 0% in the cyclophosphamide group. CONCLUSIONS: Myeloablative autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation achieved long-term benefits in patients with scleroderma, including improved event-free and overall survival, at a cost of increased expected toxicity. Rates of treatment-related death and post-transplantation use of DMARDs were lower than those in previous reports of nonmyeloablative transplantation. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00114530 .).
Authors: Oana I Craciunescu; Beverly A Steffey; Chris R Kelsey; Nicole A Larrier; Cathy J Paarz-Largay; Robert G Prosnitz; Nelson Chao; John Chute; Cristina Gasparetto; Mitchell Horwitz; Gwynn Long; David Rizzieri; Keith M Sullivan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-08-26 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: P J Clements; P A Lachenbruch; J R Seibold; B Zee; V D Steen; P Brennan; A J Silman; N Allegar; J Varga; M Massa Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Svetlana I Nihtyanova; Benjamin E Schreiber; Voon H Ong; Daniel Rosenberg; Pia Moinzadeh; J Gerrard Coghlan; Athol U Wells; Christopher P Denton Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Paolo A Muraro; Harlan Robins; Sachin Malhotra; Michael Howell; Deborah Phippard; Cindy Desmarais; Alessandra de Paula Alves Sousa; Linda M Griffith; Noha Lim; Richard A Nash; Laurence A Turka Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2014-02-17 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Donald P Tashkin; Michael D Roth; Philip J Clements; Daniel E Furst; Dinesh Khanna; Eric C Kleerup; Jonathan Goldin; Edgar Arriola; Elizabeth R Volkmann; Suzanne Kafaja; Richard Silver; Virginia Steen; Charlie Strange; Robert Wise; Fredrick Wigley; Maureen Mayes; David J Riley; Sabiha Hussain; Shervin Assassi; Vivien M Hsu; Bela Patel; Kristine Phillips; Fernando Martinez; Jeffrey Golden; M Kari Connolly; John Varga; Jane Dematte; Monique E Hinchcliff; Aryeh Fischer; Jeffrey Swigris; Richard Meehan; Arthur Theodore; Robert Simms; Suncica Volkov; Dean E Schraufnagel; Mary Beth Scholand; Tracy Frech; Jerry A Molitor; Kristin Highland; Charles A Read; Marvin J Fritzler; Grace Hyun J Kim; Chi-Hong Tseng; Robert M Elashoff Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Keith M Sullivan; Navneet S Majhail; Christopher Bredeson; Paul A Carpenter; Soumya Chatterjee; Leslie J Crofford; George E Georges; Richard A Nash; Marcelo C Pasquini; Stefanie Sarantopoulos; Jan Storek; Bipin Savani; E William St Clair Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Elizabeth R Volkmann; Donald P Tashkin; Myung Sim; Ning Li; Ellen Goldmuntz; Lynette Keyes-Elstein; Ashley Pinckney; Daniel E Furst; Philip J Clements; Dinesh Khanna; Virginia Steen; Dean E Schraufnagel; Shiva Arami; Vivien Hsu; Michael D Roth; Robert M Elashoff; Keith M Sullivan Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Vivek Nagaraja; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Daniel E Furst; Masataka Kuwana; Yannick Allanore; Christopher P Denton; Ganesh Raghu; Vallerie Mclaughlin; Panduranga S Rao; James R Seibold; John D Pauling; Michael L Whitfield; Dinesh Khanna Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: John A Snowden; Basil Sharrack; Mohammed Akil; David G Kiely; Alan Lobo; Majid Kazmi; Paolo A Muraro; James O Lindsay Journal: Clin Med (Lond) Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.659