Phuc Le1, Michael B Rothberg1. 1. Center for Value-Based Care Research, Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
Importance: The live attenuated herpes zoster vaccine (ZVL) is recommended for immunocompetent adults 60 years or older, but the efficacy wanes with age and over time. A new adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine (HZ/su) has higher efficacy but might be more expensive. The choice of vaccines depends on their relative values. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of HZ/su. Design, Setting, and Participants: Markov decision model with transition probabilities based on the US medical literature. Participants were immunocompetent adults 60 years or older. Data were derived from participant groups ranging in number from less than 100 to more than 30 000 depending on the variable assessed. The study dates were July 1 to 31, 2017. Exposures: No vaccination, ZVL (single dose), and HZ/su (2-dose series) vaccine administered at different ages. Main Outcomes and Measures: Total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated. Results: Based on randomized clinical trial data, at a price of $280 per series ($140 per dose), HZ/su was more effective and less expensive than ZVL at all ages. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios compared with no vaccination ranged from $20 038 to $30 084 per QALY, depending on vaccination age. The finding was insensitive to variations in most model inputs other than the vaccine price and certain combinations of low adherence rate with a second dose and low efficacy of a single dose of HZ/su. At the current ZVL price ($213 per dose), HZ/su had lower overall costs than ZVL up to a price of $350 per 2-dose series. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, HZ/su had 73% probability of being cost-effective for 60-year-olds at $50 000 per QALY. Conclusions and Relevance: Under conservative assumptions, at a price of $280 per series ($140 per dose), HZ/su would cost less than ZVL and has a high probability of offering good value.
Importance: The live attenuated herpes zoster vaccine (ZVL) is recommended for immunocompetent adults 60 years or older, but the efficacy wanes with age and over time. A new adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine (HZ/su) has higher efficacy but might be more expensive. The choice of vaccines depends on their relative values. Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of HZ/su. Design, Setting, and Participants: Markov decision model with transition probabilities based on the US medical literature. Participants were immunocompetent adults 60 years or older. Data were derived from participant groups ranging in number from less than 100 to more than 30 000 depending on the variable assessed. The study dates were July 1 to 31, 2017. Exposures: No vaccination, ZVL (single dose), and HZ/su (2-dose series) vaccine administered at different ages. Main Outcomes and Measures: Total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated. Results: Based on randomized clinical trial data, at a price of $280 per series ($140 per dose), HZ/su was more effective and less expensive than ZVL at all ages. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios compared with no vaccination ranged from $20 038 to $30 084 per QALY, depending on vaccination age. The finding was insensitive to variations in most model inputs other than the vaccine price and certain combinations of low adherence rate with a second dose and low efficacy of a single dose of HZ/su. At the current ZVL price ($213 per dose), HZ/su had lower overall costs than ZVL up to a price of $350 per 2-dose series. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, HZ/su had 73% probability of being cost-effective for 60-year-olds at $50 000 per QALY. Conclusions and Relevance: Under conservative assumptions, at a price of $280 per series ($140 per dose), HZ/su would cost less than ZVL and has a high probability of offering good value.
Authors: Fangjun Zhou; Kristine M Bisgard; Hussain R Yusuf; Robert R Deuson; Sue K Bath; Trudy V Murphy Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Lisa A Prosser; Megan A O'Brien; Noelle-Angelique M Molinari; Katherine H Hohman; Kristin L Nichol; Mark L Messonnier; Tracy A Lieu Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Barbara P Yawn; Peter C Wollan; Marge J Kurland; Jennifer L St Sauver; Patricia Saddier Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Kenneth E Schmader; Myron J Levin; John W Gnann; Shelly A McNeil; Timo Vesikari; Robert F Betts; Susan Keay; Jon E Stek; Nickoya D Bundick; Shu-Chih Su; Yanli Zhao; Xiaoming Li; Ivan S F Chan; Paula W Annunziato; Janie Parrino Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-01-30 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Anthony L Cunningham; Himal Lal; Martina Kovac; Roman Chlibek; Shinn-Jang Hwang; Javier Díez-Domingo; Olivier Godeaux; Myron J Levin; Janet E McElhaney; Joan Puig-Barberà; Carline Vanden Abeele; Timo Vesikari; Daisuke Watanabe; Toufik Zahaf; Anitta Ahonen; Eugene Athan; Jose F Barba-Gomez; Laura Campora; Ferdinandus de Looze; H Jackson Downey; Wayne Ghesquiere; Iris Gorfinkel; Tiina Korhonen; Edward Leung; Shelly A McNeil; Lidia Oostvogels; Lars Rombo; Jan Smetana; Lily Weckx; Wilfred Yeo; Thomas C Heineman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Edward T Chiyaka; Van T Nghiem; Lu Zhang; Abhishek Deshpande; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Phuc Le Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 4.558
Authors: Pieter T de Boer; Alies van Lier; Hester de Melker; Albert J M van Wijck; Jan C Wilschut; Albert Jan van Hoek; Maarten J Postma Journal: BMC Med Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Brandon J Patterson; Philip O Buck; Desmond Curran; Desirée Van Oorschot; Justin Carrico; William L Herring; Yuanhui Zhang; Jeffrey J Stoddard Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes Date: 2021-05-26
Authors: Kathleen L Dooling; Angela Guo; Manisha Patel; Grace M Lee; Kelly Moore; Edward A Belongia; Rafael Harpaz Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Lei Wang; Erik A M Verschuuren; Coretta C van Leer-Buter; Stephan J L Bakker; Anoek A E de Joode; Johanna Westra; Nicolaas A Bos Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2018-07-16 Impact factor: 7.561