Mélanie Drolet1, Zhou Zhou1, Chantal Sauvageau1, Philippe DeWals1, Vladimir Gilca1, Rachid Amini1, Élodie Bénard1, Marc Brisson2. 1. Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Québec (Drolet, Zhou, Sauvageau, Gilca, Bénard, Brisson) and Département de médecine sociale et préventive (Sauvageau, DeWals, Bénard, Brisson), Université Laval; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Sauvageau, DeWals, Gilca, Amini), Québec, Que. 2. Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Québec (Drolet, Zhou, Sauvageau, Gilca, Bénard, Brisson) and Département de médecine sociale et préventive (Sauvageau, DeWals, Bénard, Brisson), Université Laval; Institut national de santé publique du Québec (Sauvageau, DeWals, Gilca, Amini), Québec, Que. Marc.Brisson@crchudequebec.ulaval.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Two vaccines against herpes zoster are currently authorized for use in Canada: the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine and live attenuated zoster vaccine. We compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these 2 vaccines. METHODS: We used a decision analytic static cohort model parametrized with Canadian epidemiologic and economic data. We performed the economic analysis from the health care system perspective, using a lifetime horizon and a 3% discount rate for costs and benefits. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, relative to no vaccination. We ran 30 000 simulations varying all model parameters, including vaccine costs, efficacy and waning. RESULTS: The number needed to vaccinate (NNV) was higher for the live attenuated zoster vaccine than for the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine for all herpes zoster-related events at all ages. For example, in persons exactly 65 years old, for herpes zoster, median NNV was 21 (90% uncertainty interval [UI] 13-31) versus 8 (90% UI 6-18), and for postherpetic neuralgia, NNV was 64 (90% UI 33-93) versus 31 (90% UI 23-73). For the recombinant vaccine, the median cost-effectiveness ratios varied between cost-saving and $25 881 per QALY gained for adults aged 50 years or older. For the live vaccine, the cost-effectiveness ratios varied between cost-saving and $130 587 per QALY gained and were less than $45 000 per QALY gained only for those 65 to 75 years old. Given its higher efficacy, we estimated that the cost for the complete series of the recombinant vaccine could be $150 to $200 more than the cost of the live vaccine and still be considered cost-effective. INTERPRETATION: Our model predicted that the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine is likely cost-effective in Canada for adults 60 years or older, and is likely more cost-effective than live attenuated zoster vaccine. These results have informed updated national and provincial recommendations on herpes zoster vaccination.
BACKGROUND: Two vaccines against herpes zoster are currently authorized for use in Canada: the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine and live attenuated zoster vaccine. We compared the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these 2 vaccines. METHODS: We used a decision analytic static cohort model parametrized with Canadian epidemiologic and economic data. We performed the economic analysis from the health care system perspective, using a lifetime horizon and a 3% discount rate for costs and benefits. The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, relative to no vaccination. We ran 30 000 simulations varying all model parameters, including vaccine costs, efficacy and waning. RESULTS: The number needed to vaccinate (NNV) was higher for the live attenuated zoster vaccine than for the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine for all herpes zoster-related events at all ages. For example, in persons exactly 65 years old, for herpes zoster, median NNV was 21 (90% uncertainty interval [UI] 13-31) versus 8 (90% UI 6-18), and for postherpetic neuralgia, NNV was 64 (90% UI 33-93) versus 31 (90% UI 23-73). For the recombinant vaccine, the median cost-effectiveness ratios varied between cost-saving and $25 881 per QALY gained for adults aged 50 years or older. For the live vaccine, the cost-effectiveness ratios varied between cost-saving and $130 587 per QALY gained and were less than $45 000 per QALY gained only for those 65 to 75 years old. Given its higher efficacy, we estimated that the cost for the complete series of the recombinant vaccine could be $150 to $200 more than the cost of the live vaccine and still be considered cost-effective. INTERPRETATION: Our model predicted that the recombinant subunit zoster vaccine is likely cost-effective in Canada for adults 60 years or older, and is likely more cost-effective than live attenuated zoster vaccine. These results have informed updated national and provincial recommendations on herpes zoster vaccination.
Authors: Wim Opstelten; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Gerrit A van Essen; Anton M van Loon; Albert J M van Wijck; Cornelis J Kalkman; Theo J M Verheij; Karel G M Moons Journal: Pain Date: 2007-03-26 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: M Brisson; W J Edmunds; B Law; N J Gay; R Walld; M Brownell; L L Roos; L Roos; G De Serres Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: M N Oxman; M J Levin; G R Johnson; K E Schmader; S E Straus; L D Gelb; R D Arbeit; M S Simberkoff; A A Gershon; L E Davis; A Weinberg; K D Boardman; H M Williams; J Hongyuan Zhang; P N Peduzzi; C E Beisel; V A Morrison; J C Guatelli; P A Brooks; C A Kauffman; C T Pachucki; K M Neuzil; R F Betts; P F Wright; M R Griffin; P Brunell; N E Soto; A R Marques; S K Keay; R P Goodman; D J Cotton; J W Gnann; J Loutit; M Holodniy; W A Keitel; G E Crawford; S-S Yeh; Z Lobo; J F Toney; R N Greenberg; P M Keller; R Harbecke; A R Hayward; M R Irwin; T C Kyriakides; C Y Chan; I S F Chan; W W B Wang; P W Annunziato; J L Silber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ralph P Insinga; Robbin F Itzler; James M Pellissier; Patricia Saddier; Alexander A Nikas Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sarah A Buchan; Nick Daneman; Jun Wang; Sarah E Wilson; Gary Garber; Anne E Wormsbecker; Tony Antoniou; Shelley L Deeks Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 3.240