Literature DB >> 29296811

Randomized phase 2 trial of regadenoson for treatment of acute vaso-occlusive crises in sickle cell disease.

Joshua J Field1,2, Elaine Majerus3, Victor R Gordeuk4, Michel Gowhari4, Carolyn Hoppe5, Matthew M Heeney6,7,8, Maureen Achebe9,10,11, Alex George12, Hillary Chu7, Brian Sheehan7, Maneka Puligandla13, Donna Neuberg13, Gene Lin14, Joel Linden14,15, David G Nathan6,7,8.   

Abstract

Adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) agonists have been shown to decrease tissue inflammation induced by hypoxia/reoxygenation in mice with sickle cell disease (SCD). The key mediator of the A2AR agonist's anti-inflammatory effects is a minor lymphocyte subset, invariant natural killer T (iNKT) cells. We tested the hypothesis that administration of an A2AR agonist in patients with SCD would decrease iNKT cell activation and dampen the severity of vaso-occlusive (VO) crises. In a phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we administered a 48-hour infusion of the A2AR agonist regadenoson (1.44 μg/kg per hour) to patients with SCD during VO crises to produce a plasma concentration of ∼5 nM, a concentration known from prior studies to suppress iNKT cell activation in SCD. The primary outcome measure was a >30% reduction in the percentage of activated iNKT cells. Ninety-two patients with SCD were randomized to receive a 48-hour infusion of regadenoson or placebo, in addition to standard-of-care treatment, during hospital admission for a VO crisis and had analyzable iNKT cell samples. The proportion of subjects who demonstrated a reduction of >30% in activated iNKT cells was not significantly different between the regadenoson and placebo arms (43% vs 23%; P = .07). There were also no differences between regadenoson and placebo groups in length of hospital stay, mean total opioid use, or pain scores. These data demonstrate that a low-dose infusion of regadenoson intended to reduce the activity of iNKT cells is not sufficient to produce a statistically significant reduction in such activation or in measures of clinical efficacy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01788631.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29296811      PMCID: PMC5728341          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017009613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  13 in total

1.  Regadenoson pharmacokinetics and tolerability in subjects with impaired renal function.

Authors:  Toufigh Gordi; Brent Blackburn; Hsiao Lieu
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.126

2.  Controlled trial of transfusions for silent cerebral infarcts in sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Michael R DeBaun; Mae Gordon; Robert C McKinstry; Michael J Noetzel; Desiree A White; Sharada A Sarnaik; Emily R Meier; Thomas H Howard; Suvankar Majumdar; Baba P D Inusa; Paul T Telfer; Melanie Kirby-Allen; Timothy L McCavit; Annie Kamdem; Gladstone Airewele; Gerald M Woods; Brian Berman; Julie A Panepinto; Beng R Fuh; Janet L Kwiatkowski; Allison A King; Jason M Fixler; Melissa M Rhodes; Alexis A Thompson; Mark E Heiny; Rupa C Redding-Lallinger; Fenella J Kirkham; Natalia Dixon; Corina E Gonzalez; Karen A Kalinyak; Charles T Quinn; John J Strouse; J Philip Miller; Harold Lehmann; Michael A Kraut; William S Ball; Deborah Hirtz; James F Casella
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Purified poloxamer 188 for treatment of acute vaso-occlusive crisis of sickle cell disease: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  E P Orringer; J F Casella; K I Ataga; M Koshy; P Adams-Graves; L Luchtman-Jones; T Wun; M Watanabe; F Shafer; A Kutlar; M Abboud; M Steinberg; B Adler; P Swerdlow; C Terregino; S Saccente; B Files; S Ballas; R Brown; S Wojtowicz-Praga; J M Grindel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Nitric oxide for inhalation in the acute treatment of sickle cell pain crisis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark T Gladwin; Gregory J Kato; Debra Weiner; Onyinye C Onyekwere; Carlton Dampier; Lewis Hsu; R Ward Hagar; Thomas Howard; Rachelle Nuss; Maureen M Okam; Carole K Tremonti; Brian Berman; Anthony Villella; Lakshmanan Krishnamurti; Sophie Lanzkron; Oswaldo Castro; Victor R Gordeuk; Wynona A Coles; Marlene Peters-Lawrence; James Nichols; Mary K Hall; Mariana Hildesheim; William C Blackwelder; James Baldassarre; James F Casella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Adenosine A2A receptors induced on iNKT and NK cells reduce pulmonary inflammation and injury in mice with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Kori L Wallace; Joel Linden
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  The role of adenosine signaling in sickle cell therapeutics.

Authors:  Joshua J Field; David G Nathan; Joel Linden
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 3.722

7.  Sickle cell vaso-occlusion causes activation of iNKT cells that is decreased by the adenosine A2A receptor agonist regadenoson.

Authors:  Joshua J Field; Gene Lin; Maureen M Okam; Elaine Majerus; Jeffrey Keefer; Onyinye Onyekwere; Ainsley Ross; Federico Campigotto; Donna Neuberg; Joel Linden; David G Nathan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  NKT cells mediate pulmonary inflammation and dysfunction in murine sickle cell disease through production of IFN-gamma and CXCR3 chemokines.

Authors:  Kori L Wallace; Melissa A Marshall; Susan I Ramos; Joanne A Lannigan; Joshua J Field; Robert M Strieter; Joel Linden
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Adenosine A2A receptor activation reduces hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury by inhibiting CD1d-dependent NKT cell activation.

Authors:  Courtney M Lappas; Yuan-Ji Day; Melissa A Marshall; Victor H Engelhard; Joel Linden
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  NNKTT120, an anti-iNKT cell monoclonal antibody, produces rapid and sustained iNKT cell depletion in adults with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Joshua J Field; Elaine Majerus; Kenneth I Ataga; Elliot P Vichinsky; Robert Schaub; Robert Mashal; David G Nathan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  New insights into the pathophysiology and development of novel therapies for sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Scott Moerdler; Deepa Manwani
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  Elevated ecto-5'-nucleotidase: a missing pathogenic factor and new therapeutic target for sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Morayo Adebiyi; Rong Rong Liu; Anren Song; Jeanne Manalo; Yuan Edward Wen; Alexander Q Wen; Tingting Weng; Junsuk Ko; Modupe Idowu; Rodney E Kellems; Holger K Eltzschig; Michael R Blackburn; Harinder S Juneja; Yang Xia
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-08-14

Review 3.  Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Sickle Cell Disease: From Basics to Therapeutics.

Authors:  Junaid Ansari; Felicity N E Gavins
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  The developmental journey of therapies targeting purine receptors: from basic science to clinical trials.

Authors:  Seunga Han; Haruna Suzuki-Kerr; Srdjan M Vlajkovic; Peter R Thorne
Journal:  Purinergic Signal       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.950

Review 5.  A Comprehensive Review of the Treatment and Management of Pain in Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Jacob Fiocchi; Ivan Urits; Vwaire Orhurhu; Mariam Salisu Orhurhu; Stephen Giacomazzi; Briggs Hoyt; Alan D Kaye; Rachel J Kaye; Omar Viswanath
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2020-03-21

6.  Advances in new drug therapies for the management of sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Kenneth I Ataga; Payal C Desai
Journal:  Expert Opin Orphan Drugs       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 0.694

Review 7.  Therapeutic strategies for sickle cell disease: towards a multi-agent approach.

Authors:  Marilyn J Telen; Punam Malik; Gregory M Vercellotti
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 8.  Historical and Current Adenosine Receptor Agonists in Preclinical and Clinical Development.

Authors:  Kenneth A Jacobson; Dilip K Tosh; Shanu Jain; Zhan-Guo Gao
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 5.505

9.  Adenosine receptor agonism protects against NETosis and thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Ramadan A Ali; Alex A Gandhi; He Meng; Srilakshmi Yalavarthi; Andrew P Vreede; Shanea K Estes; Olivia R Palmer; Paula L Bockenstedt; David J Pinsky; Joan M Greve; Jose A Diaz; Yogendra Kanthi; Jason S Knight
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 10.  Research in Sickle Cell Disease: From Bedside to Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Gabriel Salinas Cisneros; Swee Lay Thein
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.