Brad A Krajina1, Carolina Tropini2, Audrey Zhu1, Philip DiGiacomo3, Justin L Sonnenburg2, Sarah C Heilshorn4, Andrew J Spakowitz1,4,5,6. 1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States. 2. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, United States. 3. Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States. 4. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States. 5. Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States. 6. Biophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Abstract
The development of experimental techniques capable of probing the viscoelasticity of soft materials over a broad range of time scales is essential to uncovering the physics that governs their behavior. In this work, we develop a microrheology technique that requires only 12 μL of sample and is capable of resolving dynamic behavior ranging in time scales from 10-6 to 10 s. Our approach, based on dynamic light scattering in the single-scattering limit, enables the study of polymer gels and other soft materials over a vastly larger hierarchy of time scales than macrorheology measurements. Our technique captures the viscoelastic modulus of polymer hydrogels with a broad range of stiffnesses from 10 to 104 Pa. We harness these capabilities to capture hierarchical molecular relaxations in DNA and to study the rheology of precious biological materials that are impractical for macrorheology measurements, including decellularized extracellular matrices and intestinal mucus. The use of a commercially available benchtop setup that is already available to a variety of soft matter researchers renders microrheology measurements accessible to a broader range of users than existing techniques, with the potential to reveal the physics that underlies complex polymer hydrogels and biological materials.
The development of experimental techniques capable of probing the viscoelasticity of soft materials over a broad range of time scales is essential to uncovering the physics that governs their behavior. In this work, we develop a microrheology technique that requires only 12 μL of sample and is capable of resolving dynamic behavior ranging in time scales from 10-6 to 10 s. Our approach, based on dynamic light scattering in the single-scattering limit, enables the study of polymer gels and other soft materials over a vastly larger hierarchy of time scales than macrorheology measurements. Our technique captures the viscoelastic modulus of polymer hydrogels with a broad range of stiffnesses from 10 to 104 Pa. We harness these capabilities to capture hierarchical molecular relaxations in DNA and to study the rheology of precious biological materials that are impractical for macrorheology measurements, including decellularized extracellular matrices and intestinal mucus. The use of a commercially available benchtop setup that is already available to a variety of soft matter researchers renders microrheology measurements accessible to a broader range of users than existing techniques, with the potential to reveal the physics that underlies complex polymer hydrogels and biological materials.
Soft materials exhibit a rich range of
rheological behaviors that
play a central role in determining their processing behavior and practical
functions. Examples include the engineered materials for biomedical
applications,[1] self-healing materials for
synthetic skin and flexible electronics,[2] self-assembling copolymers for nanopatterning,[3] and the active cytoskeleton of living cells.[4] The rheology of soft materials is governed by
physical processes that occur over a vast range of time scales,[5] which presents a formidable challenge for unlocking
the molecular underpinnings of viscoelastic behavior. Thus, the development
of rheological measurement techniques that interrogate the viscoelasticity
of soft materials across disparate time scales offers the opportunity
to gain deep insights into the molecular physics of soft matter with
broad applications across scientific, engineering, and medical disciplines.
Despite significant progress that has been forged in developing microrheology
techniques that surpass the capabilities of conventional rheology
and are amenable to the small sample quantities often encountered
for biological materials,[6−8] the requirements for specialized
expertise, time-consuming data acquisition and analysis, or a limited
range of detectable material properties pose substantial barriers
to establishing these techniques as accessible characterization tools
across a broader community of materials chemistry and biomaterials
researchers.Conventional rheological techniques (macrorheology),
which measure
the material response to macroscopic external perturbations, typically
provide access to a very limited range of time scales. In particular,
oscillatory rheology provides access to frequencies ω of only
up to about 102 s–1. Although broader
ranges of time scales can be accessed by combining oscillatory shear
rheology with squeeze-flow and torsional resonance techniques, this
requires the combined use of three separate measurements to access
the frequency range of interest.[9,10] Furthermore, such macrorheology
experiments typically require large volumes of material, which prohibits
measurements on certain precious biological samples, where only microliter-scale
volumes can be obtained and procurement is often time-consuming and
costly.To surmount these challenges, a variety of microrheology
techniques
have emerged that probe the viscoelasticity of soft matter at time
scales and sample volumes beyond the reach of conventional macrorheology.[6,7,11,12] Microrheology techniques typically employ micrometer-scale probe
particles that sense their local viscoelastic environment in response
to thermal (passive) or external (active) forces. Among these techniques,
video particle tracking (VPT)[7,13,14] and quadrant detection[8,12,15−17] microrheology have enjoyed extensive implementation
for probing spatially localized viscoelasticity in heterogeneous samples
and living cells and require very low sample volumes (<1 μL).
Spatially localized information from these techniques is achieved
either by explicitly tracking particle trajectories by optical microscopy
(VPT) or by focusing a laser onto individual probe particles and monitoring
laser deflections onto a quadrant photodiode detector (quadrant detection).
For bulk-averaged viscoelasticity across broad time scales, dynamic
light scattering in the multiple-scattering limit, i.e., diffusing
wave spectroscopy (DWS), has also been widely leveraged.[11,15,18] However, each of these techniques
suffers from distinct requirements that limit their widespread adoption
by users beyond microrheology specialists, such as applicability to
only soft materials (G < 100 Pa for VPT[19]), technically challenging implementation (quadrant
detection and VPT), low statistical power (quadrant detection), or
large sample volume requirements (at least 150 μL for DWS[6,20−27]). Thus, there exists a critical need for a technique that is readily
available to researchers with a broad range of expertise and that
measures precious soft and biological materials across a breadth of
viscoelastic properties and time scales.Here, we develop a
technique that is broadly accessible to users
with a range of expertise and that interrogates viscoelasticity of
small-volume samples over a vast spectrum of material properties and
time scales. Our experimental methodology is based on dynamic light
scattering (DLS) in the single-scattering limit and hence requires
only dilute probe concentrations (<0.5%). This DLS microrheology
(DLSμR) technique extracts the frequency-dependent shear moduli
of materials with a broad range of stiffnesses up to 104 Pa and over a vastly broader range of time scales (10–1 to 106 s–1) than oscillatory macrorheology
(<102 s–1). This is achieved using
a commercial benchtop instrument that is already available to a variety
of materials chemists, involves minimal user intervention, and requires
sample volumes as low as 12 μL. We leverage this technique to
measure the hierarchy of molecular relaxations that occur in DNA solutions
and to capture the viscoelastic behavior of precious biological materials,
including extracellular matrices and mucus, where conventional macrorheology
is impractical (Figure ). This technique is accessible to a wide range of users and opens
opportunities for studying a range of complex biological and soft
materials.
Figure 1
DLSμR captures the multiscale viscoelasticity of soft matter,
including polymeric gels and precious biological materials, such as
DNA solutions, intestinal mucus, and extracellular matrices. DLSμR
reveals signatures of molecular relaxations that occur over 7 decades
in time, ranging from 10 s down to 10–6 s, which
spans the time scales associated with reptation of polymers in entangled
networks, entropic elasticity of cross-linked or entangled gels, and
internal relaxations of individual polymer chains.
DLSμR captures the multiscale viscoelasticity of soft matter,
including polymeric gels and precious biological materials, such as
DNA solutions, intestinal mucus, and extracellular matrices. DLSμR
reveals signatures of molecular relaxations that occur over 7 decades
in time, ranging from 10 s down to 10–6 s, which
spans the time scales associated with reptation of polymers in entangled
networks, entropic elasticity of cross-linked or entangled gels, and
internal relaxations of individual polymer chains.The ranges of frequency and viscoelasticity that
we explore in
this work have typically been viewed to be inaccessible to DLS in
the single-scattering limit.[18,28−31] However, as we demonstrate, this perceived limitation reflects misconceptions
related to the statistics of photon correlation in single-scattering
detection. We harness the highest spatial resolution accessible to
single-scattering DLS by operating in noninvasive backscatter detection
mode, and prove that commercial photon correlation instruments are
capable of capturing probe fluctuations at nanometer-scale resolution.
This reveals access to time scales and material stiffness previously
viewed to be accessible by microrheology only through DWS and quadrant
detection.
Results
DLSμR Offers an Accessible Technique
for Rheological Measurements
of Soft Matter over a Wide Spectrum of Time Scales and Material Properties
Figure illustrates
our workflow for extracting the frequency-dependent shear modulus G*(ω) of soft materials using a commercially available
DLS instrument. In contrast to DWS, by operating in the single-scattering
limit, our methodology involves dilute concentrations of probe particles
(<0.5% w/v) that serve as light scatterers.
Figure 2
DLSμR workflow.
The polymer solution or gel precursor is
mixed with a dilute concentration of tracer particles (<0.5% w/v).
DLS is performed in a backscattering configuration using a commercial
benchtop instrument. Brownian motion of the tracer particles produces
fluctuations in scattering intensity that give rise to a characteristic
scattering intensity autocorrelation. The autocorrelation is analyzed
by our custom software to extract the mean-squared displacement of
particles, which is used to determine the frequency-dependent linear
viscoelastic shear modulus G*(ω).
DLSμR workflow.
The polymer solution or gel precursor is
mixed with a dilute concentration of tracer particles (<0.5% w/v).
DLS is performed in a backscattering configuration using a commercial
benchtop instrument. Brownian motion of the tracer particles produces
fluctuations in scattering intensity that give rise to a characteristic
scattering intensity autocorrelation. The autocorrelation is analyzed
by our custom software to extract the mean-squared displacement of
particles, which is used to determine the frequency-dependent linear
viscoelastic shear modulus G*(ω).The commercial benchtop instrument we leverage
here illuminates
the sample with a 50 μm diameter laser beam, and scattered light
is focused onto a photodiode detector using a translating lens to
collect photons from a specified scattering volume within the sample
of about 1.4 nL. In practice, we use a total sample volume of 12 μL.
This strikingly contrasts with the volume requirements of DWS, where
at least 150 μL of sample is typically required.[6,20−27]We perform DLS in backscatter detection mode, which offers the smallest
length scale of resolution accessible to the wavelength of the laser,
thereby capturing time scales that are inaccessible to oscillatory
shear rheology and VPT. In contrast to DWS, the low probe concentrations
typically required for performing single-scattering DLS can present
a challenge for separating the scattering by probe particles from
background scattering by the material.[32] Another key advantage of the backscattering optics utilized here
is that much higher probe concentrations can be used without exiting
the single-scattering regime due to the shorter photon path length
in the backscattering configuration and the ability to tune the photon
path length using the translating lens system.[33] Leveraging these capabilities enables us to use probe concentrations
(0.1% to 0.25%) that are 1–2 orders of magnitude greater than
those typically implemented for single-scattering DLS,[18,31,32] thereby ensuring dominance of
scattering from probe particles.Thermal fluctuations of the
tracer particles give rise to scattering
intensity fluctuations, which are described by a time lag τ
dependent scattering intensity autocorrelation g(2)(τ). Scattering photon autocorrelations are collected
using a digital correlator with delay times ranging from 0.5 μs
to 70 s, and the experimentally accessible frequency range within
this window is dictated by the time scales over which particle displacements
are detectable. The intensity autocorrelation encodes the average
mean-squared displacement of tracer particles within the scattering
volume ⟨Δr2(τ)⟩
over the time lag τ. The mean-squared displacement of particles
with radius a in turn can be used to extract the
frequency-dependent shear modulus according to the generalized Stokes–Einstein
relation, G*(ω) = kBT/[πa i ω⟨Δr2(ω)⟩].
Our custom software package analyzes raw scattering intensity autocorrelations
to extract G*(ω) of the material.To
investigate the capability of our technique to capture the viscoelastic
behavior of polymer gels, we study chemically cross-linked polyacrylamide
networks over a broad range of stiffnesses (shear moduli G* from 10 to 104 Pa) and compare our DLSμR measurements
to those obtained from conventional oscillatory macrorheology. Over
this full range of stiffnesses, our DLSμR measurements exhibit
excellent agreement with macrorheology in the frequency range in which
the two techniques overlap (Figure ). This viscoelasticity spectrum accessible to DLSμR
spans the stiffnesses of a diverse range of biological tissues, ranging
from mucus to skeletal muscle.[34] This range
of biologically relevant stiffnesses is inaccessible to VPT, which
would be limited to materials with |G*| < 102 Pa using the 100 nm diameter probe particles used in our
experiments.[19] We note that although generally
good agreement is found between our DLSμR measurements and macrorheology,
the modulus in our DLSμR experiments underestimates the modulus
by about a factor of 2 for the stiffer (5% and 10%) gels. This may
be due to inhomogeneities formed during the free-radical polymerization,
which are likely to be more prevalent in the more rapidly forming
gels.[35] Such inhomogeneities may force
the probe particles into more compliant regions of the network. A
similar effect of inhomogeneities in gel microrheology has been previously
described,[7] and particle tracking microrheology
experiments have demonstrated the existence of mechanical heterogeneity
in polyacrylamide gels.[31]
Figure 3
DLSμR recapitulates
macrorheology in cross-linked polyacrylamide
gels with shear moduli G* spanning 101 to 104 Pa. Top: Comparison of the frequency ω dependence
of the magnitude of the shear modulus |G*| obtained
by DLSμR and macrorheology of polyacrylamide gels with varying
polacrylamide concentrations (% w/v). The dashed lines represent the
high-frequency scaling of a Rouse polymer G* ∼
ω1/2 and space-filling branched polymer fractals
with nondraining hydrodynamics G* ∼ ω.
Bottom: Illustration of typical particle trajectories occurring over
a time interval corresponding to the angular frequency ω = 101 s for a 100 nm diameter tracer particle embedded in gels
with the indicated polyacrylamide composition.
DLSμR recapitulates
macrorheology in cross-linked polyacrylamide
gels with shear moduli G* spanning 101 to 104 Pa. Top: Comparison of the frequency ω dependence
of the magnitude of the shear modulus |G*| obtained
by DLSμR and macrorheology of polyacrylamide gels with varying
polacrylamide concentrations (% w/v). The dashed lines represent the
high-frequency scaling of a Rouse polymer G* ∼
ω1/2 and space-filling branched polymer fractals
with nondraining hydrodynamics G* ∼ ω.
Bottom: Illustration of typical particle trajectories occurring over
a time interval corresponding to the angular frequency ω = 101 s for a 100 nm diameter tracer particle embedded in gels
with the indicated polyacrylamide composition.Moreover, DLSμR captures a vastly broader range of
time scales
than conventional oscillatory macrorheology and VPT, ranging from
frequencies ω of 10–1 to 106 s–1. Although similar frequency ranges have been captured
in macrorheology measurements that combine oscillatory rheology, squeeze-flow,
and torsional resonance, this is achieved only with the combined use
of 3 separate measurements, in total requiring hundreds of microliters
of material.[9,10] Our technique enables us to probe
a hierarchy of viscoelastic processes in the material in a
single measurement with only 12 μL of sample. Our measurements
demonstrate that, at intermediate to long time scales, the gels behave
as elastic solids in which G* is approximately constant
with respect to frequency. At short time scales, the tracer particles
probe faster relaxation modes in the gel due to effective elastic
chains that give rise to a power-law scaling with G* ∼ ωα. Consistent with the decreasing
molecular weight of effective elastic chains with increasing cross-linking
density, we find that the time scale at which these relaxation modes
emerge decreases by 2 orders of magnitude as the gel stiffness increases
across the range spanned in our measurements (Supporting Information and Supporting Figure 1).For the most compliant gels, α ≈
1/2, consistent with
freely draining Rouse dynamics of flexible partial chains between
cross-links.[36] This suggests that, at low
polymer concentrations, the gel network is formed from loosely cross-linked
high molecular weight polymers in which each effective elastic chain
experiences overlap with surrounding chains that screen hydrodynamic
interactions. For the more densely cross-linked gels, the high-frequency
scaling behavior approaches α ≈ 1, which coincides with
the critical scaling predicted by percolation theory at the gel point
for nondraining percolating clusters[37] as
well as the expected scaling behavior for nondraining Zimm relaxation
of self-similar branched chains with a fractal dimension Df = 3.[38] This relaxation can
be interpreted in terms of a network that consists of effective elastic
chains that possess an internal fractal branched structure that is
space-filling at all length scales below the gel correlation length
and retains high-frequency signatures of the fractal structure and
dynamics present at the percolation point (see Supporting Information for derivation). This is consistent
with time–temperature superposition experiments in which fully
formed gels often exhibit scaling of G″ that
mirrors the fractal dynamics at the gel point.[39]The transition in the high-frequency relaxation from
Rouse to critically
overlapped Zimm dynamics suggests that the greater cross-linking efficiency
in the higher concentration gels produces more tightly cross-linked
networks consisting of branched effective elastic chains that do not
overlap with surrounding chains, and therefore do not experience screening
of hydrodynamic interactions. This is consistent with time-cure superposition
experiments just above the gel point, which show larger critical relaxation
scaling exponents with greater cross-linking efficiency (compare ref (40) and ref (41)) or lower molecular weight
polymer precursors.[42] Similarly, atomic
force microscopy microrheology experiments on polyacrylamide gels
at frequencies up to ω ≈ 103 rad/s have demonstrated
a high-frequency scaling exponent that increases with polyacrylamide
content, approaching α ≈ 1 for 10 kPa gels.[43] Our technique thus offers a substantial advantage
over oscillatory shear rheology in terms of elucidating the hierarchy
of physical processes that govern the behavior of polymer gels.Unlike VPT and quadrant detection microrheology, which involve
explicit tracking of particle trajectories, DLSμR yields measurements
of tracer particle fluctuations that are directly averaged over the
1.4 nL scattering volume. Hence, VPT and quadrant detection extract
spatially heterogeneous viscoelasticity that is concealed by averaging
inherent to DLSμR. However, our technique offers a more streamlined
and accessible work flow for diverse users than VPT and quadrant detection
microrheology. In contrast to VPT, in which each time point requires
a full microscopy image of tracer particle positions to be acquired,
stored, and processed, DLSμR measurements directly provide the
statistically averaged particle fluctuations in the form of the scattering
intensity autocorrelation function, thereby reducing the data footprint
associated with each measurement by several orders of magnitude. Unlike
VPT, quadrant detection can access the range of viscoelasticity and
time scales that are encompassed by DLSμR, but quadrant detection
requires tracking individual trajectories at a time by optically trapping
single probe particles. This comes at the expense of vastly decreased
statistical power, even compared to VPT, in which approximately 100
particles are typically present in the field of view. Moreover, quadrant
detection microrheology requires expertise with optical traps that
is not commonly found in many soft materials laboratories. Together,
these limitations render quadrant detection a far less accessible
and more technically challenging approach. By comparison, DLSμR
is readily implemented on a benchtop commercial instrument that is
already available to many materials chemistry and biomaterials researchers
and can rapidly capture viscoelasticity with high statistical power
while requiring minimal user intervention.Historically, DLSμR
in the single-scattering limit has found
limited use in comparison to VPT, quadrant detection, and DWS, and
it is conventionally considered to be inadequate for viscoelastic
properties in the stiffness and time-scale ranges probed in our measurements.[18,28−31] By comparison to quadrant detection and DWS, previous studies in
single-scattering detection have typically explored a much more limited
range of stiffnesses (G* < 100 Pa) and frequencies
ω < 104 s–1.[18,31,32,44−46] The range of stiffnesses and time scales accessible is fundamentally
limited by the length scale of tracer particle fluctuations to which
the light-scattering configuration is sensitive (visualized in Figure ). This can be understood
on the basis of the generalized Stokes–Einstein relation, wherein
the mean-squared displacements of tracer particles in an elastic gel
are inversely proportional to the shear modulus.[11] Thus, the sensitivity is dictated by the smallest length
scale of probe fluctuations that produce detectable decreases in the
scattering intensity autocorrelation g(2)(τ).We find that the backscattering optics utilized
here are capable
of resolving decreases in the scattering intensity autocorrelation
that correspond to mean-squared displacements of about 1 nm2, which are 2 orders of magnitude smaller than the mean-squared displacements
detectable by VPT,[19] as well as those previously
accessed using single-scattering DLS for microrheology of soft polyacrylamide
gels.[31] In accordance with the generalized
Stokes–Einstein relation, the minimum detectable displacement,
together with the probe particle size, dictates the maximum measurable
stiffness. The 1 nm resolution achieved here renders measurements
on gels as stiff as 104 Pa possible using 100 nm beads,
and the maximum accessible stiffness scales inversely with the size
of the probe that is required to satisfy the continuum assumption
of the Stokes–Einstein relation. In our experiments, the 100
nm beads are much larger than the mesh size of the polyacrylamide
network, which will be about 10 nm or less in the range of concentrations
we probe,[47] and are therefore sufficiently
large to ensure that the continuum limit is reached.It is noteworthy
that the length scale of fluctuations to which
we are sensitive is much smaller than the length scale that would
be estimated based on the scattering wave vector q. For the backscattering angle θ (173°), the wavelength
λ of the laser (633 nm), and a refractive index n equal to that of water, the scattering wave vector in our experiments q = 4πn sin(θ/2)/λ corresponds
to a length scale q–1 = 38 nm.[48] For this reason, DLSμR in single-scattering
detection has often been viewed as unsuitable for measurements in
the stiffness and frequency ranges that require the spatial resolution
captured in our experiments.[18,28] In addition to improved
spatial resolution through the use of backscattering optics compared
to some previous studies using forward or orthogonal scattering,[18,31] higher spatial resolution is also achieved by accurate estimation
of the correlation function zero-time intercept using the methods
described in the Supporting Information. Accurate estimation of the zero-time correlation intercept has
been previously reported to represent a limitation for DLS microrheology.[18] Our results emphasize the importance of considering
the sensitivity of photon correlation detection and the reliability
of correlation intercept estimation in evaluating the limits of the
DLSμR technique.Polymer gels exhibit broken ergodicity
due to frozen-in density
fluctuations formed during the gelation process, which must be accounted
for in interpretation of DLS autocorrelation data.[49] In principle, broken ergodicity can be corrected for by
obtaining ensemble-averaged scattering intensity autocorrelation functions
by collecting the time-averaged autocorrelation across an ensemble
of spatial positions in the sample, which is time-consuming and tedious.
The broken-ergodicity correction we implement here (described in the Supporting Information) enables extraction of
the contribution to the scattering intensity due to dynamic fluctuations
within the scattering volume of interest, while obviating the need
for full ensemble averaging of the correlation function. However,
we note that the acquisition times we use here to collect high-quality
photon statistics are not amenable to rapidly evolving materials,
such as during the gelation process.
DLSμR Elucidates
Hierarchical Molecular Relaxations in
DNA
The broad spectrum of time scales probed by DLS offers
the opportunity to gain insights into the physics of macromolecules
that exhibit distinct relaxation behaviors at different time scales.
Semiflexible polymers constitute an important class of macromolecules
that exhibit distinct physics at different length scales and time
scales. The physical behavior of such polymers is governed by bending
elasticity on the scale of their persistence length lp, but they can exhibit flexible Gaussian chain behavior
at lengths much longer than their persistence length. DNA represents
an excellent model system for exploring this relaxation hierarchy,
since its persistence length (lp ≈
50 nm)[50] is sufficiently short to produce
flexible Gaussian chain statistics at experimentally accessible molecular
weights, but provides sufficient bending stiffness to yield semiflexible
polymer behavior at experimentally accessible length scales and time
scales.DLSμR measurements were performed on semidilute,
unentangled solutions of linear DNA (1.0 mg/mL of 5.8 kilobase chains,
i.e., contour length L ≈ 1.9 μm). Our
results elucidate a hierarchy of regimes of physical behavior (Figure , designated as A,
B, and C). We relate the transition between these regimes to two theoretically
predicted time scales (τ ∼ ω–1): the bending relaxation time of semiflexible subsections of the
DNA chain τbend and the Rouse time associated with
total relaxation of all internal polymer elastic modes τR. These time scales approximately define three regimes that
correspond at the shortest times (τ < τbend < τR) to bending fluctuations in the semiflexible
DNA double helix, at intermediate times (τbend <
τ < τR) to relaxations of internal segments
of the chain that behave like flexible segments, and at the longest
times (τbend < τR < τ)
to total chain diffusion. Our DLSμR measurements agree quantitatively
with theoretical predictions (dotted and solid curves in Figure ) for a wormlike
chain (WLC), which we obtain by combining the high-frequency scaling
limit of a WLC with the full analytical solution of a Rouse polymer,
as described in the Supporting Information and Supporting Figure 5.
Figure 4
DLSμR of DNA solutions
reveals a hierarchy of molecular relaxations.
Top: Shear modulus G* as a function of angular frequency
ω of semidilute DNA solutions. Regions A, B, and C represent
approximate regimes in which the viscoelastic response is expected
to probe the total chain relaxation, internal flexible chain relaxation,
and bend relaxation, respectively. Dashed lines indicate the expected
scaling laws for a Rouse polymer (G* ∼ ω1/2) and a freely draining semiflexible chain (G* ∼ ω3/4) . The dotted and solid lines indicate
the theoretical predictions for G′ and G″, respectively, of a semiflexible polymer modeled
as a WLC. Middle: Illustrations of the physical behavior probed at
the time-scale regimes annotated A, B, and C in the top plot. Bottom:
Representative snapshot of a 5.8 kilobase DNA molecule modeled as
a WLC obtained by Monte Carlo simulation. Magnifications represent
the approximate contour length of the DNA molecule whose relaxations
dominate the viscoelastic response that is probed at time scales τ
(which reside within regimes A, B, and C) by tracer particles undergoing
approximate displacements Δr.
DLSμR of DNA solutions
reveals a hierarchy of molecular relaxations.
Top: Shear modulus G* as a function of angular frequency
ω of semidilute DNA solutions. Regions A, B, and C represent
approximate regimes in which the viscoelastic response is expected
to probe the total chain relaxation, internal flexible chain relaxation,
and bend relaxation, respectively. Dashed lines indicate the expected
scaling laws for a Rouse polymer (G* ∼ ω1/2) and a freely draining semiflexible chain (G* ∼ ω3/4) . The dotted and solid lines indicate
the theoretical predictions for G′ and G″, respectively, of a semiflexible polymer modeled
as a WLC. Middle: Illustrations of the physical behavior probed at
the time-scale regimes annotated A, B, and C in the top plot. Bottom:
Representative snapshot of a 5.8 kilobase DNA molecule modeled as
a WLC obtained by Monte Carlo simulation. Magnifications represent
the approximate contour length of the DNA molecule whose relaxations
dominate the viscoelastic response that is probed at time scales τ
(which reside within regimes A, B, and C) by tracer particles undergoing
approximate displacements Δr.At the shortest times (largest ω, region
C), we identify
a rheological response which reflects thermal bending fluctuations
in the DNA double helix due to its finite bending stiffness. In this
regime, the scaling behavior in our DLSμR measurements approaches
the theoretical predictions for the high-frequency response of a WLC,
in which the polymer contribution to the shear
modulus is ,[51,52] where ρ is the
polymer contour length per unit volume, kBT is thermal energy, lp is the persistence length, and ξ⊥ is the
transverse friction coefficient per unit length (which we estimate
to be 4 × 10–2 Pa × s by fitting
theoretical predictions for a WLC to our data using ξ⊥ as a fitting parameter). We theoretically estimate the time scale
where these bending fluctuations will manifest to be τbend = ξ⊥(2lp)4/[(3π/2)4lpkBT] ≈ 40 μs.[53] This theoretically predicted time scale (indicated
by the boundary between regions B and C in Figure ) corresponds approximately to the frequency
ω = τbend–1 near which the rheological behavior from DLSμR
transitions to the high-frequency scaling limit.At intermediate
time scales (region B), which are long in comparison
to the relaxation time of bending modes but shorter than the time
required for relaxation of all internal polymer elastic modes, the
shear modulus reflects the viscoelastic relaxation of flexible subchains
that behave like entropic springs. For a Rouse-like polymer, in which
hydrodynamic interactions can be neglected, this is theoretically
predicted to produce a shear modulus in which the storage and loss
moduli scale as G′ = G″
∼ ω1/2.[5] Our measurements
show that the relaxation behavior of the DNA chains approaches this
scaling behavior over a limited range of frequencies (102 < ω < 103) before transitioning to total
chain diffusion at longer time scales and bend fluctuation dynamics
at shorter time scales.At the longest time scales (smallest
ω, region A), all internal
modes of the polymer chain have fully relaxed, and the shear modulus
captures the viscoelastic response due to translational diffusion
of the polymer chains. For semidilute unentangled solutions, this
response is anticipated at times longer than the Rouse relaxation
time of the entire polymer contour length L: τR = 2lpξRL2/(3π2kBT) ≈ 3 × 10–2 s.[5] At frequencies ω < τR–1, our measurements exhibit a transition
to viscous dynamics, with G″ > G′, which is consistent with relaxation of the internal
entropic
elastic modes of the polymers and a transition toward total chain
diffusion. This transition is in excellent agreement with theoretical
predictions for a WLC that exhibits flexible chain behavior at these
time scales, which we obtain using a Rouse monomer friction coefficient
per unit length of ξR = 1.0 × 10–2 Pa × s based on the fitting procedure described in Supporting Information. The value of ξR we obtain is about 4 times smaller than the transverse friction
coefficient ξ⊥.In order to evaluate
the consistency of our fitted friction coefficients,
we compare the value of ξR obtained from our DLSμR
data to existing diffusivity measurements and relate our observation
that ξ⊥ ≈ 4ξR to polymer
physics theory. In the semidilute regime, the effective Rouse friction
coefficient ξR is dependent on the polymer concentration,
which defines the length scale for hydrodynamic screening by overlapping
polymers. At length scales larger than the hydrodynamic screening
length, each polymer in the semidilute network can be viewed as consisting
of coarse-grained polymer “blobs” that diffuse like
effective Rouse monomers[36] and exhibit
internal hydrodynamic interactions at smaller length and time scales.
Measurements of the diffusivity D of fluorescently
labeled 5.9 kb DNA have confirmed this concentration dependence and
at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL provide a Rouse friction coefficient
ξR = kBT/(DL) = 0.6 × 10–2 Pa ×
s.[54,55] This is somewhat lower than our value ξR = 1.0 × 10–2 Pa × s, and further
investigation is required to elucidate the origin of this discrepancy.Below the hydrodynamic screening length, and within each effective
Rouse monomer, DNA may be expected to behave according to slender
body hydrodynamics.[56] In this regime, the
hydrodynamics are described by two friction coefficients, ξ⊥ and ξ∥, which represent the
transverse and longitudinal friction, respectively, and ξ⊥ = 2ξ∥. If the friction coefficient
of each Rouse monomer corresponds to the total friction of each subsection
that obeys slender body dynamics, then slender body theory implies
that ξR = 3(2/ξ⊥ + 1/ξ∥)−1 = 3ξ⊥/4. However, our fit to the DLSμR data instead yields ξR ≈ ξ⊥/4. The origin of this
disagreement is unclear, and may reflect additional many-body effects
due to the semidilute solution not considered by slender body theory.Importantly, our results are only slightly dependent on probe particle
size for probe diameters of at least 500 nm (the probe size used in Figure ), indicating that
the probes sense the continuum viscoelasticity of the fluid (Supporting Figure 2). This is consistent with
previous microrheology studies of linear DNA solutions, which show
that, at the concentration used in our work, and with DNA molecular
weights where entanglements are weak or nonexistent, noncontinuum
effects such as polymer depletion are not substantial, provided the
probes are larger than the radius of gyration of the polymers.[57,58] Unlike the polyacrylamide gels, 100 nm probes do not satisfy the
continuum assumption of the Stokes–Einstein relation, since
the radius of gyration of a 5.8 kilobase Gaussian DNA chain is about
180 nm, and the system resides close to the critical overlap concentration.The transition to an ω3/4 scaling behavior at
high frequencies has been previously demonstrated using quadrant detection
and DWS microrheology of other semiflexible polymers, such as F-actin,
wormlike micelles, and polysaccharides.[8,59−62] However, despite the extensive history of DNA as a model polymer
in the polymer physics community, previous microrheology studies on
DNA solutions were conducted at much lower frequencies than the maximum
frequency accessed here.[6,63,64] Our measurements not only capture the expected high-frequency scaling
behavior that has been confirmed in experiments on other semiflexible
polymers but also exhibit quantitative agreement with polymer physics
theory across the full range of molecular relaxations.
DLSμR
Accesses Multiscale Relaxation in Extracellular
Matrices Where Time–Temperature Superposition Fails
Time–temperature superposition is a widely implemented technique
for broadening the frequency range that is accessed in a conventional
macrorheology experiment. In brief, this technique involves collecting
the frequency-dependent shear modulus at a range of temperatures and
horizontally shifting the isotherms to construct a single “master
curve” that encompasses a substantially broader range of frequencies
than those accessed at any particular temperature.[65] However, this construction is valid only for materials
in which the relaxation rates and physical processes that govern the
viscoelastic behavior can be described by a single temperature dependence.Biological systems provide a variety of instances in which the
assumptions underlying time–temperature superposition fail.
In fact, in general, time–temperature superposition does not
substantially broaden the frequency range for aqueous polymer systems,
since the available temperature variations do not lead to substantial
frequency shift factors. In particular, extracellular matrices represent
an important class of biological materials that exhibit nontrivial
thermal responsiveness that violates time–temperature superposition.
Furthermore, the rheological behavior of extracellular matrices exhibits
a profound impact on directing cellular behavior.[66,67]To illustrate the utility of the DLSμR for these materials,
we conducted measurements on Matrigel across temperatures spanning
its sol–gel transition. Matrigel consists of a complex mixture
of extracellular matrix proteins and is widely used in mammalian tissue
culture.[68] We find that DLSμR provides
excellent agreement with macrorheology at fixed temperature (Supporting Figure 3), but reveals a temperature-dependent
viscoelastic spectrum that clearly violates time–temperature
superposition (Figure ). Below the sol–gel transition, Matrigel exhibits viscoelastic
power-law behavior with G″ > G′ over the full range of accessible frequencies. Above the
sol–gel transition, the shear modulus displays two distinct
regimes consistent with a polymer hydrogel. At low to intermediate
frequencies, a plateau modulus with a weak frequency dependence emerges
with G′ > G″, reflecting
behavior reminiscent of an elastic solid. At high frequencies (ω
> 104 s–1), the shear modulus increases
with frequency and approaches a power-law behavior that reflects coupling
to the underlying internal relaxation modes. These results demonstrate
that DLSμR enables measurements of the broad frequency viscoelasticity
of biological materials where conventional oscillatory rheology with
time–temperature superposition is not an option.
Figure 5
DLSμR
captures the viscoelastic response of Matrigel across
a broad range of time scales where time–temperature superposition
fails. Closed and open symbols represent frequency dependence ω
of the storage and loss shear moduli (G′ and G″, respectively) at temperatures below (12°,
blue) and above (37°, red) the sol–gel transition of Matrigel.
DLSμR
captures the viscoelastic response of Matrigel across
a broad range of time scales where time–temperature superposition
fails. Closed and open symbols represent frequency dependence ω
of the storage and loss shear moduli (G′ and G″, respectively) at temperatures below (12°,
blue) and above (37°, red) the sol–gel transition of Matrigel.
DLSμR Reveals Broad
Frequency Entanglement Dynamics in
Intestinal Mucus for Which Macrorheology Is Impractical
Intestinal
mucus lines the luminal surface of the intestinal epithelium and serves
as an essential barrier whose functions include acting as a physical
barrier against microbial invasion and providing nutritional support
to the host microbiome.[69−71] Disruptions to the mucosal layer
are implicated in a variety of diseases, which suggests that the ability
to quantify the physical properties of the mucosal layer may provide
biophysical insights into the role of mucus in such pathologies. Intestinal
mucus is available in only small quantities from small animal models
and humanpatients, as only a small amount can be recovered from a
single animal in a mouse model, and in humanpatients, mucus must
be obtained from biopsies. Thus, intestinal mucus represents an excellent
example of a biological material in which acquiring macrorheology
measurements is challenging, costly, and impractical.Our DLSμR
measurements on intestinal mucus isolated from healthy mice (Figure ) reveal a viscoelastic
spectrum that spans 6 decades in time and exhibits signatures of a
hydrogel formed by a network of physical entanglements among macromolecules.
The frequency-dependent shear modulus reflects three distinct regimes
of physical behavior that are predicted by the Doi and Edwards tube
theory for entangled polymers. In this model, polymers within an entangled
network are envisioned to be confined by the surrounding network within
an effective tube that restricts their motion within the tube diameter
(see illustrations in Figure ). At short times (large ω, region C), the viscoelastic
spectrum is dominated by the internal relaxation of flexible subsections
of the polymers that are smaller than the effective tube diameter
and have yet to “discover” that they are confined by
entanglements within the surrounding network. In this regime, G*(ω) possesses a frequency scaling behavior that
reflects single chain dynamics that are intermediate between a Rouse
polymer and a WLC. At intermediate times (region B), polymer relaxations
are governed by entanglement constraints with the surrounding polymer
matrix, which produces an extended elastic plateau modulus in which G′ > G″ and G′ exhibits a weak frequency dependence. At sufficiently long
times (small ω, region A), the polymers are able to escape their
local entanglements by reptation, which enables the material to flow,
yielding a viscous response with G″ > G′.
Figure 6
DLSμR captures the entangled dynamics of intestinal
mucus
of healthy and colitic mice. Top left: Dependence of the shear modulus G* on angular frequency ω of intestinal mucus isolated
from healthy mice. The shear modulus exhibits three regimes, A, B,
and C, which we identify as corresponding to reptation of polymers
within an entangled network, elastic behavior due to entanglement
constraints, and Rouse-like flexible chain dynamics at length scales
below the entanglement confinement length, respectively. Solid curves
represent the mean among 3 independent biological reproductions. Shading
represents 90% confidence intervals of the mean generated by bootstrap
resampling spectra from independent biological reproductions. The
dashed line represents the high-frequency scaling behavior of a Rouse
polymer G* ∼ ω1/2, which
is provided to guide the eye. Bottom left: Illustration of the physical
behavior probed in time-scale regimes annotated A, B, and C, as they
are interpreted in terms of the Doi and Edwards tube model of entangled
polymer dynamics. Top right: Comparison of the frequency-dependent
shear modulus G* of intestinal mucus isolated from
healthy (control) mice and mice treated with dextran sulfate sodium
(DSS) to induce colitis. The high frequency scaling behaviors of a
Rouse polymer and a WLC (G* ∼ ω1/2 and G* ∼ ω3/4,
respectively) are indicated with dashed lines for reference. Bottom
right: Confocal imaging of DSS treated and control mouse colons recapitulates
physical disruption of mucus. The intestinal sections were stained
to highlight the mucus (UEA-1, green) and the DNA (DAPI, blue). In
DSS treated mice the distal colon mucus loses much of the usual striated
organization. Scale bars are 50 μm.
DLSμR captures the entangled dynamics of intestinal
mucus
of healthy and colitic mice. Top left: Dependence of the shear modulus G* on angular frequency ω of intestinal mucus isolated
from healthy mice. The shear modulus exhibits three regimes, A, B,
and C, which we identify as corresponding to reptation of polymers
within an entangled network, elastic behavior due to entanglement
constraints, and Rouse-like flexible chain dynamics at length scales
below the entanglement confinement length, respectively. Solid curves
represent the mean among 3 independent biological reproductions. Shading
represents 90% confidence intervals of the mean generated by bootstrap
resampling spectra from independent biological reproductions. The
dashed line represents the high-frequency scaling behavior of a Rouse
polymer G* ∼ ω1/2, which
is provided to guide the eye. Bottom left: Illustration of the physical
behavior probed in time-scale regimes annotated A, B, and C, as they
are interpreted in terms of the Doi and Edwards tube model of entangled
polymer dynamics. Top right: Comparison of the frequency-dependent
shear modulus G* of intestinal mucus isolated from
healthy (control) mice and mice treated with dextran sulfate sodium
(DSS) to induce colitis. The high frequency scaling behaviors of a
Rouse polymer and a WLC (G* ∼ ω1/2 and G* ∼ ω3/4,
respectively) are indicated with dashed lines for reference. Bottom
right: Confocal imaging of DSS treated and control mouse colons recapitulates
physical disruption of mucus. The intestinal sections were stained
to highlight the mucus (UEA-1, green) and the DNA (DAPI, blue). In
DSS treated mice the distal colon mucus loses much of the usual striated
organization. Scale bars are 50 μm.The rheological properties of intestinal mucus may play a
pivotal
role in gut barrier function as well as the growth of microbes embedded
within the matrix.[71,72] To demonstrate the capability
of DLSμR to capture changes in mucus rheology associated with
loss of barrier function, we investigate intestinal mucus in a mousecolitis model. Incorporation of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) into
the drinking water of mice disrupts barrier function of intestinal
mucus and induces inflammation of the underlying epithelium.[73]Figure illustrates the change in mucus rheology between healthy
and DSS treated (colitic) mice measured by DLSμR. Our results
exhibit a striking change in mucus rheology in the colitis model in
which the mucus is substantially softened by DSS treatment, suggestive
of a substantial reduction in the overall cross-linking density of
the matrix (Figure ). This perturbation to mucus viscoelasticity coincides with physical
disruption of mucus morphology within the colon, as visualized by
confocal microscopy (Figure ). Furthermore, although we cannot obtain mucus from mice
in sufficient quantities for macrorheology, to validate our DLSμR
measurements on mucus samples, we performed DLSμR on reconstituted
porcine gastric mucus and found quantitative agreement with macrorheology
(Supporting Figure 4). These findings suggest
that DLSμR may serve as a valuable tool for investigating biophysical
connections between intestinal mucus viscoelasticity and gut barrier
status.
Conclusions
In this work, we present
a microrheology technique based on DLS
in the single-scattering limit that provides access to the frequency-dependent
viscoelasticity of soft materials across up to 7 decades in time scale.
This technique requires only 12 μL of sample, which renders
it amenable to precious materials where sample volume requirements
for macrorheology and broad-frequency DWS are impractical. Moreover,
we demonstrate that, contrary to common belief, DLSμR in single-scattering
detection mode is capable of probing the viscoelasticity of polymer
hydrogels with a broad range of material properties, with shear moduli
spanning 10 to 104 Pa, which encompasses stiffnesses across
a variety of biological tissues. Importantly, this technique is implemented
with a commercial benchtop instrument and is therefore accessible
to users with a broad range of expertise.DLSμR represents
a valuable contribution to a suite of rheological
tools that are available to researchers, and extends the domain of
microrheology to a broader base of users. For applications where rapid
characterization of ensemble-averaged viscoelasticity of precious
materials is desired, DLSμR provides a powerful and accessible
alternative to existing techniques. Although VPT and quadrant detection
microrheology extract spatially heterogeneous viscoelasticity that
is lost by ensemble averaging in DLSμR, our technique overcomes
crucial challenges in these established approaches that present barriers
to their widespread implementation in the materials chemistry and
biomaterials communities. By comparison to VPT, DLSμR reveals
viscoelasticity in materials 2 orders of magnitude stiffer and across
a range of time scales that is 4 orders of magnitude greater than
those accessible to VPT, while obviating the need for the large data
footprint and cumbersome data analysis that is required of optical
microscopy. In contrast to quadrant detection and related optical
trap techniques, which present a substantial technical challenge for
many users and provide low statistical power, DLSμR is readily
implemented on a commercial benchtop platform and delivers statistically
averaged quantities with minimal user “hands-on” time.We exploit these capabilities to interrogate the hierarchical molecular
relaxations that occur in polymeric gels and precious biological materials,
including DNA, extracellular matrix, and intestinal mucus. Our measurements
capture physical processes ranging from the rapid bending fluctuations
of individual polymers to the long-time-scale relaxations in entangled
macromolecular networks, and are rationalized in terms of existing
polymer physics theories. Together, these findings demonstrate that
DLSμR is a powerful tool for exploring the rheological behavior
of a variety of precious soft and biological materials that can be
readily adopted by an expansive scope of researchers.
Methods
Detailed experimental methods are provided in the Supporting Information.
Authors: M Atakhorrami; J I Sulkowska; K M Addas; G H Koenderink; J X Tang; A J Levine; F C Mackintosh; C F Schmidt Journal: Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys Date: 2006-06-02
Authors: Hannah H Tuson; George K Auer; Lars D Renner; Mariko Hasebe; Carolina Tropini; Max Salick; Wendy C Crone; Ajay Gopinathan; Kerwyn Casey Huang; Douglas B Weibel Journal: Mol Microbiol Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 3.501
Authors: Matthew G Haugh; Ted J Vaughan; Christopher M Madl; Rosanne M Raftery; Laoise M McNamara; Fergal J O'Brien; Sarah C Heilshorn Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Michael J Kratochvil; Gernot Kaber; Sally Demirdjian; Pamela C Cai; Elizabeth B Burgener; Nadine Nagy; Graham L Barlow; Medeea Popescu; Mark R Nicolls; Michael G Ozawa; Donald P Regula; Ana E Pacheco-Navarro; Samuel Yang; Vinicio A de Jesus Perez; Harry Karmouty-Quintana; Andrew M Peters; Bihong Zhao; Maximilian L Buja; Pamela Y Johnson; Robert B Vernon; Thomas N Wight; Carlos E Milla; Angela J Rogers; Andrew J Spakowitz; Sarah C Heilshorn; Paul L Bollyky Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2022-06-22
Authors: Riley A Suhar; Vanessa M Doulames; Yueming Liu; Meghan E Hefferon; Oscar Figueroa; Hana Buabbas; Sarah C Heilshorn Journal: Biomater Sci Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 7.590
Authors: Paul M George; Byeongtaek Oh; Ruby Dewi; Thuy Hua; Lei Cai; Alexa Levinson; Xibin Liang; Brad A Krajina; Tonya M Bliss; Sarah C Heilshorn; Gary K Steinberg Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Santiago Correa; Abigail K Grosskopf; Hector Lopez Hernandez; Doreen Chan; Anthony C Yu; Lyndsay M Stapleton; Eric A Appel Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Pamela C Cai; Brad A Krajina; Michael J Kratochvil; Lei Zou; Audrey Zhu; Elizabeth B Burgener; Paul L Bollyky; Carlos E Milla; Matthew J Webber; Andrew J Spakowitz; Sarah C Heilshorn Journal: Soft Matter Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 3.679
Authors: Daniel R Hunt; Katarina C Klett; Shamik Mascharak; Huiyuan Wang; Diana Gong; Junzhe Lou; Xingnan Li; Pamela C Cai; Riley A Suhar; Julia Y Co; Bauer L LeSavage; Abbygail A Foster; Yuan Guan; Manuel R Amieva; Gary Peltz; Yan Xia; Calvin J Kuo; Sarah C Heilshorn Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 16.806