| Literature DB >> 29296563 |
Hwayong Park1, Youn-Hwan Hwang1, Jin Yeul Ma1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traditional medicine and herbal prescriptions are becoming more popular, and they account for a large share of the world's healthcare research studies, developments, and market demands. Increasing scientific evidence of the substantive efficacies such as preventive health keeping pharmaceutical materials and dietary supplements can be found elsewhere. Above all, safety should be the critical premise for considering developmental materials such as pharmaceuticals without side effects and toxicity.Entities:
Keywords: genotoxicity; herb; toxicity; traditional medicine
Year: 2017 PMID: 29296563 PMCID: PMC5741389 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2017.07.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Med Res ISSN: 2213-4220
Medicinal Herbs Used to Prepare K2H
| Scientific name | Family name | Latin name | Origin | Amount (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compositae | Arctii semen | China | 90.0 | |
| Leguminosae | Glycyrrhizae radix | China | 75.0 | |
| Magnoliaceae | Magnoliae cortex | China | 60.0 | |
| Zingiberaceae | Zingiberis rhizoma | Korea | 75.0 | |
| Total | 300.0 | |||
K2H, KIOM2012H.
Treatment Group Organizations and Summary of Chromosomal Aberrations in Cultured Cells
| Treatment series | Dose (μg/mL) | S9 mix | Aberrations | PP + ER | No. aberrant metaphase | RICC (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cs type | Ct type | Others | No. Gaps | No. | Decision | No. Gap+ | No. Gap– | Decision | |||||||
| csd | cse | ctd | cte | ||||||||||||
| 1 | Vehicle | 0 | + | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | N | 1.0 | 0.0 | N | 100 |
| K2H | 875 | + | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | N | 0.0 | 0.0 | N | 98 | |
| 1750 | + | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 0.0 | N | 1.5 | 0.0 | N | 99 | ||
| 3500 | + | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | N | 3.5 | 3.0 | P | 46 | ||
| B[a]P | 20 | + | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 34.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | N | 24.5 | 24.0 | P | 54 | |
| 2 | Vehicle | 0 | − | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | N | 0.5 | 0.0 | N | 100 |
| K2H | 625 | − | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | N | 0.0 | 0.0 | N | 101 | |
| 1250 | − | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | N | 0.0 | 0.0 | N | 84 | ||
| 2500 | − | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 9.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | N | 4.5 | 4.5 | P | 48 | ||
| EMS | 800 | − | 0.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 22.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | N | 20.0 | 19.5 | P | 53 | |
| 3 | Vehicle | 0 | − | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | N | 0.0 | 0.0 | N | 100 |
| K2H | 200 | − | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | N | 0.5 | 0.0 | N | 83 | |
| 400 | − | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | N | 1.0 | 0.0 | N | 78 | ||
| 800 | − | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | N | 1.0 | 0.0 | N | 49 | ||
| EMS | 600 | − | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 17.5 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | N | 27.5 | 25.5** | P | 62 | |
Numbers of cells examined, aberrations, PP + ER, and metaphases are mean values.
Treatment series 1: Treatment time − Recovery time = 6–18 hours.
Treatment series 2: Treatment time − Recovery time = 6–18 hours.
Treatment series 3: Treatment time − Recovery time = 24–0 hours.
B[a]P, benzo[a]pyrene; Cs, chromosome; csd, chromosome type deletions; cse, chromosome type exchanges; Ct, chromatid; ctd, Chromatid type deletions; cte, chromatid type exchanges; EMS, ethyl methanesulfonate; ER, endoreduplication; Gaps: chromosome type + chromatid type gaps; K2H, KIOM2012H; N, negative; Others, metaphases with more than 10 aberrations (including gaps) or with chromosome fragmentation; P, positive; PP, polyploidy; RICC, relative increase in cell count.
Significantly different at p < 0.05 (Fisher’s exact test) as compared with negative control.
Significantly different at p < 0.01 (Fisher’s exact test) as compared with negative control.
Fig. 1Body weight changes and gains in K2H administered male and female rats for 13 weeks of experimental period.
K2H, KIOM2012H.
Fig. 2Effects of K2H on bacterial reverse mutation. (A) With S9 metabolic activation. (B) Without S9 metabolic activation.
*Significantly different at p < 0.05 (Fisher’s exact test) as compared with negative control.
−, vehicle control; +, positive control; K2H, KIOM2012H.
Fig. 3Effect of K2H on micronucleated polychromatic erythrocyte (MNPCE, left Y axis) and PCE/(PCE + NCE) (polychromatic/normochromatic erythrocyte) ratio (right Y axis).
*Significantly different at p < 0.05 (Fisher’s exact test) as compared with negative control.
−, vehicle control; +, positive control; K2H, KIOM2012H; NCE, normochromatic erythrocyte; PCE, polychromatic erythrocyte.