Literature DB >> 29295930

Identification of a ubiquitin-binding interface using Rosetta and DEER.

Maxx H Tessmer1, David M Anderson2, Adam M Pickrum1, Molly O Riegert1, Rocco Moretti3, Jens Meiler2,3, Jimmy B Feix4, Dara W Frank5.   

Abstract

ExoU is a type III-secreted cytotoxin expressing A2 phospholipase activity when injected into eukaryotic target cells by the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa The enzymatic activity of ExoU is undetectable in vitro unless ubiquitin, a required cofactor, is added to the reaction. The role of ubiquitin in facilitating ExoU enzymatic activity is poorly understood but of significance for designing inhibitors to prevent tissue injury during infections with strains of P. aeruginosa producing this toxin. Most ubiquitin-binding proteins, including ExoU, demonstrate a low (micromolar) affinity for monoubiquitin (monoUb). Additionally, ExoU is a large and dynamic protein, limiting the applicability of traditional structural techniques such as NMR and X-ray crystallography to define this protein-protein interaction. Recent advancements in computational methods, however, have allowed high-resolution protein modeling using sparse data. In this study, we combine double electron-electron resonance (DEER) spectroscopy and Rosetta modeling to identify potential binding interfaces of ExoU and monoUb. The lowest-energy scoring model was tested using biochemical, biophysical, and biological techniques. To verify the binding interface, Rosetta was used to design a panel of mutations to modulate binding, including one variant with enhanced binding affinity. Our analyses show the utility of computational modeling when combined with sensitive biological assays and biophysical approaches that are exquisitely suited for large dynamic proteins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DEER; Rosetta; computational modeling; continuous-wave spectroscopy; ubiquitin-binding domain

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29295930      PMCID: PMC5776994          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716861115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  51 in total

1.  Dead-time free measurement of dipole-dipole interactions between electron spins.

Authors:  M Pannier; S Veit; A Godt; G Jeschke; H W Spiess
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions.

Authors:  Joël Janin; Kim Henrick; John Moult; Lynn Ten Eyck; Michael J E Sternberg; Sandor Vajda; Ilya Vakser; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-07-01

3.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gray; Stewart Moughon; Chu Wang; Ora Schueler-Furman; Brian Kuhlman; Carol A Rohl; David Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Small-molecule inhibitors of protein-protein interactions: progressing towards the dream.

Authors:  Michelle R Arkin; James A Wells
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  De novo high-resolution protein structure determination from sparse spin-labeling EPR data.

Authors:  Nathan Alexander; Marco Bortolus; Ahmad Al-Mestarihi; Hassane Mchaourab; Jens Meiler
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 6.  Computational modeling of protein assemblies.

Authors:  Neelesh Soni; M S Madhusudhan
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  ExoU expression by Pseudomonas aeruginosa correlates with acute cytotoxicity and epithelial injury.

Authors:  V Finck-Barbançon; J Goranson; L Zhu; T Sawa; J P Wiener-Kronish; S M Fleiszig; C Wu; L Mende-Mueller; D W Frank
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  A novel phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate binding domain mediates plasma membrane localization of ExoU and other patatin-like phospholipases.

Authors:  Gregory H Tyson; Andrei S Halavaty; Hyunjin Kim; Brett Geissler; Mallory Agard; Karla J Satchell; Wonhwa Cho; Wayne F Anderson; Alan R Hauser
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 5.486

9.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance to the max.

Authors:  Keith Poole
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Actin activates Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoY nucleotidyl cyclase toxin and ExoY-like effector domains from MARTX toxins.

Authors:  Alexander Belyy; Dorothée Raoux-Barbot; Cosmin Saveanu; Abdelkader Namane; Vasily Ogryzko; Lina Worpenberg; Violaine David; Veronique Henriot; Souad Fellous; Christien Merrifield; Elodie Assayag; Daniel Ladant; Louis Renault; Undine Mechold
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  10 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of spin-label modeling methods for protein structural studies.

Authors:  Maxx H Tessmer; Elizabeth R Canarie; Stefan Stoll
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.699

2.  Identification and Verification of Ubiquitin-Activated Bacterial Phospholipases.

Authors:  Maxx H Tessmer; David M Anderson; Adam M Pickrum; Molly O Riegert; Dara W Frank
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Conformational Changes and Membrane Interaction of the Bacterial Phospholipase, ExoU: Characterization by Site-Directed Spin Labeling.

Authors:  Jimmy B Feix; Samantha Kohn; Maxx H Tessmer; David M Anderson; Dara W Frank
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.194

4.  Interactions of the effector ExoU from Pseudomonas aeruginosa with short-chain phosphatidylinositides provide insights into ExoU targeting to host membranes.

Authors:  Tzvia I Springer; Terry-Elinor Reid; Samantha L Gies; Jimmy B Feix
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Characterization of the ExoU activation mechanism using EPR and integrative modeling.

Authors:  Maxx H Tessmer; Samuel A DeCero; Diego Del Alamo; Molly O Riegert; Jens Meiler; Dara W Frank; Jimmy B Feix
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A pipeline to evaluate inhibitors of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin U.

Authors:  Daniel M Foulkes; Keri McLean; Yalin Zheng; Joscelyn Sarsby; Atikah S Haneef; David G Fernig; Craig Winstanley; Neil Berry; Stephen B Kaye
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Utilizing in silico and in vitro methods to identify possible binding sites of a novel ligand against Pseudomonas aeruginosa phospholipase toxin ExoU.

Authors:  Krista Chamberlain; Mya Johnson; Terry-Elinor Reid; Tzvia I Springer
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2021-12-16

8.  The bacterial toxin ExoU requires a host trafficking chaperone for transportation and to induce necrosis.

Authors:  Vincent Deruelle; Stéphanie Bouillot; Viviana Job; Emmanuel Taillebourg; Marie-Odile Fauvarque; Ina Attrée; Philippe Huber
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Toxin ExoU as a Therapeutic Target in the Treatment of Bacterial Infections.

Authors:  Daniel M Foulkes; Keri McLean; Atikah S Haneef; David G Fernig; Craig Winstanley; Neil Berry; Stephen B Kaye
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2019-12-16

Review 10.  Perspectives on the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III Secretion System Effector ExoU and Its Subversion of the Host Innate Immune Response to Infection.

Authors:  Kierra S Hardy; Maxx H Tessmer; Dara W Frank; Jonathon P Audia
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.546

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.