Literature DB >> 29294333

Variability in non-invasive brain stimulation studies: Reasons and results.

Andrea Guerra1, Virginia López-Alonso2, Binith Cheeran3, Antonio Suppa4.   

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques (NIBS), such as Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS), Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), are widely used to probe plasticity in the human motor cortex (M1). Although TBS, PAS and tDCS differ in terms of physiological mechanisms responsible for experimentally-induced cortical plasticity, they all share the ability to elicit long-term potentiation (LTP) and depression (LTD) in M1. However, NIBS techniques are all affected by relevant variability in intra- and inter-subject responses. A growing number of factors contributing to NIBS variability have been recently identified and reported. In this review, we have readdressed the issue of variability in human NIBS studies. We have first briefly discussed the physiological mechanisms responsible for TBS, PAS and tDCS-induced cortical plasticity. Then, we have provided statistical measures of intra- and inter-subject variability, as calculated in previous studies. Finally, we have reported in detail known sources of variability by categorizing them into physiological, technical and statistical factors. Improving knowledge about sources of variability could lead to relevant advances in designing new tailored NIBS protocols in physiological and pathological conditions.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-invasive brain stimulation; Paired associative stimulation; Theta burst stimulation; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29294333     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  32 in total

1.  Individual differences in TMS sensitivity influence the efficacy of tDCS in facilitating sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  L Labruna; A Stark-Inbar; A Breska; M Dabit; B Vanderschelden; M A Nitsche; R B Ivry
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 2.  Age-related changes in motor cortex plasticity assessed with non-invasive brain stimulation: an update and new perspectives.

Authors:  John G Semmler; Brodie J Hand; Ryoki Sasaki; Ashley Merkin; George M Opie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation on corticomotor excitability of the biceps brachii in nonimpaired individuals.

Authors:  Neil Mittal; Blaize C Majdic; Adam P Sima; Carrie L Peterson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Facilitation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Response to a Modified 30 Hz Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Protocol in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Katarina Hosel; François Tremblay
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-12

5.  Shaping the Effects of Associative Brain Stimulation by Contractions of the Opposite Limb.

Authors:  Richard G Carson; Michelle L Rankin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-19

6.  Test-Retest Reliability of the Effects of Continuous Theta-Burst Stimulation.

Authors:  Ali Jannati; Peter J Fried; Gabrielle Block; Lindsay M Oberman; Alexander Rotenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Comparison of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Electrode Montages for the Lower Limb Motor Cortex.

Authors:  Radhika Patel; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-08-06

8.  Brain glucose uptake during transcranial direct current stimulation measured with functional [18F]FDG-PET.

Authors:  Christoph Kraus; Andreas Hahn; Helen Sigurdardottir; Benjamin Spurny; Wolfgang Wadsak; Markus Mitterhauser; Marcus Hacker; Siegfried Kasper; Rupert Lanzenberger
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.978

9.  Boosting the LTP-like plasticity effect of intermittent theta-burst stimulation using gamma transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Andrea Guerra; Antonio Suppa; Matteo Bologna; Valentina D'Onofrio; Edoardo Bianchini; Peter Brown; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 10.  Multiple Motor Learning Processes in Humans: Defining Their Neurophysiological Bases.

Authors:  Danny Spampinato; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 7.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.