Literature DB >> 29294216

A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of PA21 versus sevelamer in dialysis patients.

Dengpiao Xie1, Naijing Ye2, Mingquan Li2.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PA21 versus sevelamer in dialysis patients.
METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trial Registries for randomized controlled trials comparing PA21 and sevelamer in dialysis patients.
RESULTS: Four studies were included. Compared with sevelamer group, PA21 needed fewer mean daily number of tablets (WMD, - 7.97 pill; 95% CI, - 11.28 to - 4.65, p < 0.00001), developed fewer all adverse events (RR = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.11, p = 0.05), and developed fewer gastrointestinal adverse events (RR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.53, p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in serum phosphorus between two groups (WMD, - 0.07 mmol/L; 95% CI, - 0.15 to 0.02, p = 0.12). As for serum calcium, there was also no significant difference between two groups (WMD, 0.27 mmol/L; 95% CI, - 0.63 to 1.17, p = 0.55).
CONCLUSION: PA21 can effectively control serum phosphorus with lower pill burden and less side effects than sevelamer. PA21 might be another valuable choice for dialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia when patients are unable to tolerate sevelamer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; PA21; Sevelamer; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29294216     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1774-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  25 in total

1.  Phosphate binder pill burden, patient-reported non-adherence, and mineral bone disorder markers: Findings from the DOPPS.

Authors:  Rachel B Fissell; Angelo Karaboyas; Brian A Bieber; Ananda Sen; Yun Li; Antonio A Lopes; Takashi Akiba; Jürgen Bommer; Jean Ethier; Michel Jadoul; Ronald L Pisoni; Bruce M Robinson; Francesca Tentori
Journal:  Hemodial Int       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 1.812

Review 2.  Control of serum phosphorus: implications for coronary artery calcification and calcific uremic arteriolopathy (calciphylaxis).

Authors:  G A Block
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Phosphorus binders and survival on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Tamara Isakova; Orlando M Gutiérrez; Yuchiao Chang; Anand Shah; Hector Tamez; Kelsey Smith; Ravi Thadhani; Myles Wolf
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  A 1-year randomized trial of calcium acetate versus sevelamer on progression of coronary artery calcification in hemodialysis patients with comparable lipid control: the Calcium Acetate Renagel Evaluation-2 (CARE-2) study.

Authors:  Wajeh Qunibi; Moustafa Moustafa; Larry R Muenz; David Y He; Paul D Kessler; Jose A Diaz-Buxo; Mathew Budoff
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Pill burden, adherence, hyperphosphatemia, and quality of life in maintenance dialysis patients.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Chiu; Isaac Teitelbaum; Madhukar Misra; Essel Marie de Leon; Tochi Adzize; Rajnish Mehrotra
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Serum phosphate and calcium should be primarily and consistently controlled in prevalent hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Masatomo Taniguchi; Masafumi Fukagawa; Naohiko Fujii; Takayuki Hamano; Tetsuo Shoji; Keitaro Yokoyama; Shigeru Nakai; Takashi Shigematsu; Kunitoshi Iseki; Yoshiharu Tsubakihara
Journal:  Ther Apher Dial       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.762

7.  Sevelamer crystals in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT): a new entity associated with mucosal injury.

Authors:  Benjamin J Swanson; Berkeley N Limketkai; Ta-Chiang Liu; Elizabeth Montgomery; Kamran Nazari; Jason Y Park; William C Santangelo; Michael S Torbenson; Lysandra Voltaggio; Martha M Yearsley; Christina A Arnold
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Long-term effects of the iron-based phosphate binder, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Jürgen Floege; Adrian C Covic; Markus Ketteler; Johannes F E Mann; Anjay Rastogi; Bruce Spinowitz; Edward M F Chong; Sylvain Gaillard; Laura J Lisk; Stuart M Sprague
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 9.  Phosphate binders for the treatment of chronic kidney disease: role of iron oxyhydroxide.

Authors:  Valeria Cernaro; Domenico Santoro; Antonio Lacquaniti; Giuseppe Costantino; Luca Visconti; Antoine Buemi; Michele Buemi
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2016-02-02

10.  A phase III study of the efficacy and safety of a novel iron-based phosphate binder in dialysis patients.

Authors:  Jürgen Floege; Adrian C Covic; Markus Ketteler; Anjay Rastogi; Edward M F Chong; Sylvain Gaillard; Laura J Lisk; Stuart M Sprague
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  2 in total

1.  The impact of phosphate lowering agents on clinical and laboratory outcomes in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jeerath Phannajit; Natthaphon Wonghakaeo; Kullaya Takkavatakarn; Thanin Asawavichienjinda; Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa; Somchai Eiam-Ong; Paweena Susantitaphong
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.902

2.  Changes in serum albumin and other nutritional markers when using sucroferric oxyhydroxide as phosphate binder among hemodialysis patients: a historical cohort study.

Authors:  Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Linda H Ficociello; Vidhya Parameswaran; Nicolaos V Athienites; Claudy Mullon; Robert J Kossmann; Daniel W Coyne
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.388

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.