BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dialysis patients have a high burden of co-existing diseases, poor health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), and are prescribed many medications. There are no data on daily pill burden and its relationship to HR-QOL and adherence to therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Two hundred and thirty-three prevalent, chronic dialysis patients from three units in different geographic areas in the United States underwent a single, cross-sectional assessment of total daily pill burden and that from phosphate binders. HR-QOL, adherence to phosphate binders, and serum phosphorus levels were the three main outcome measures studied. RESULTS: The median daily pill burden was 19; in one-quarter of subjects, it exceeded 25 pills/d. Higher pill burden was independently associated with lower physical component summary scale scores on HR-QOL on both univariate and multivariate analyses. Phosphate binders accounted for about one-half of the daily pill burden; 62% of the participants were nonadherent. There was a modest relationship between pill burden from phosphate binders and adherence and serum phosphorus levels; these associations persisted on multivariate analyses. There was no relationship between adherence and serum phosphorus levels. CONCLUSIONS: The daily pill burden in dialysis patients is one of the highest reported to date in any chronic disease state. Higher pill burden is associated with lower HR-QOL. There are many reasons for uncontrolled serum phosphorus levels; increasing the number of prescribed pills does not seem to improve control and may come at the cost of poorer HR-QOL.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dialysis patients have a high burden of co-existing diseases, poor health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), and are prescribed many medications. There are no data on daily pill burden and its relationship to HR-QOL and adherence to therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Two hundred and thirty-three prevalent, chronic dialysis patients from three units in different geographic areas in the United States underwent a single, cross-sectional assessment of total daily pill burden and that from phosphate binders. HR-QOL, adherence to phosphate binders, and serum phosphorus levels were the three main outcome measures studied. RESULTS: The median daily pill burden was 19; in one-quarter of subjects, it exceeded 25 pills/d. Higher pill burden was independently associated with lower physical component summary scale scores on HR-QOL on both univariate and multivariate analyses. Phosphate binders accounted for about one-half of the daily pill burden; 62% of the participants were nonadherent. There was a modest relationship between pill burden from phosphate binders and adherence and serum phosphorus levels; these associations persisted on multivariate analyses. There was no relationship between adherence and serum phosphorus levels. CONCLUSIONS: The daily pill burden in dialysis patients is one of the highest reported to date in any chronic disease state. Higher pill burden is associated with lower HR-QOL. There are many reasons for uncontrolled serum phosphorus levels; increasing the number of prescribed pills does not seem to improve control and may come at the cost of poorer HR-QOL.
Authors: Bryan Kestenbaum; Joshua N Sampson; Kyle D Rudser; Donald J Patterson; Stephen L Seliger; Bessie Young; Donald J Sherrard; Dennis L Andress Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2004-12-22 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Donna L Mapes; Antonio Alberto Lopes; Sudtida Satayathum; Keith P McCullough; David A Goodkin; Francesco Locatelli; Shunichi Fukuhara; Eric W Young; Kiyoshi Kurokawa; Akira Saito; Jürgen Bommer; Robert A Wolfe; Philip J Held; Friedrich K Port Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Rajnish Mehrotra; Kevin J Martin; Steven Fishbane; Stuart M Sprague; Steven Zeig; Michael Anger Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-06-25 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Geoffrey A Block; Preston S Klassen; J Michael Lazarus; Norma Ofsthun; Edmund G Lowrie; Glenn M Chertow Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Harold J Manley; Cory G Garvin; Debra K Drayer; Gerald M Reid; Walter L Bender; Timothy K Neufeld; Sudarshan Hebbar; Richard S Muther Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2004-05-05 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: R W Evans; D L Manninen; L P Garrison; L G Hart; C R Blagg; R A Gutman; A R Hull; E G Lowrie Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1985-02-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John T Daugirdas; Glenn M Chertow; Brett Larive; Andreas Pierratos; Tom Greene; Juan Carlos Ayus; Cynthia A Kendrick; Sam H James; Brent W Miller; Gerald Schulman; Isidro B Salusky; Alan S Kliger Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Benjamin L Howell; Christopher A Powers; Eric D Weinhandl; Wendy L St Peter; Diane L Frankenfield Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Victor Gura; Matthew B Rivara; Scott Bieber; Raj Munshi; Nancy Colobong Smith; Lori Linke; John Kundzins; Masoud Beizai; Carlos Ezon; Larry Kessler; Jonathan Himmelfarb Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-06-02
Authors: Baigalmaa Evsanaa; Irene Liu; Babak Aliazardeh; Sara Mahdavi; Gursarn Bajwa; Jerry Gula; Michelle Tam; Elena Sze; Janet M Roscoe; Paul Y Tam; Tabo Sikaneta Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 1.756