Literature DB >> 29294207

Skin cancer rates in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany before and after the introduction of the nationwide skin cancer screening program (2000-2015).

Andreas Stang1,2,3,4, Karl-Heinz Jöckel5,6, Oliver Heidinger7.   

Abstract

Germany is the first nation that implemented a nationwide skin cancer screening program in 2008. The aim is to study the effect of the program on skin cancer rates and to estimate the number needed to screen for an unselected and a hypothetical high-risk population in Germany. We used population-based data on skin cancer incidence (2000-2014), mortality, hospitalization and sick leave (2000-2015) from North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (18 million population). We calculated annual age-standardized rates per 100,000 person years and calculated the relative change of the rates (%) including 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Between 2007 and 2014, the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) of the age-standardized incidence rate of skin melanoma was 3.8% among men and women. These increases were accompanied by increases of the age-standardized mortality rates (EAPC men 3.2%, women 2.0%) and age-standardized sick leave rates (EAPC men 11.0%, women 6.1%). Hospitalization rates showed barely any change. All types of rates for nonmelanoma skin cancer showed marked increases. The number needed to screen for skin melanoma death would be 34,000 if the risk reduction due to screening would be 50%. In a hypothetical high-risk approach with 10% of the population at high risk, that is, a relative risk of melanoma death of 4.0, a skin melanoma mortality risk reduction of 50% among these people due to screening would result in a reduction of the skin melanoma mortality by 15% in the total population. However, this reduction would require a number needed to screen of 11,141. Seven years after the introduction of the skin cancer screening program, there is no discernible beneficial effect at population level. The estimated number needed to screen for skin melanoma in an unselected approach is high and a realistic high-risk approach is currently not feasible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Germany; Hospitalization; Incidence; Melanoma; Mortality; Screening; Skin neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29294207     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-017-0348-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  22 in total

1.  Systematic skin cancer screening in Northern Germany.

Authors:  Eckhard W Breitbart; Annika Waldmann; Sandra Nolte; Marcus Capellaro; Ruediger Greinert; Beate Volkmer; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Routine health data in skin cancer screening evaluation.

Authors:  N Eisemann
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  Does skin cancer screening save lives? A detailed analysis of mortality time trends in Schleswig-Holstein and Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Benefits and risks of skin cancer screening.

Authors:  Eckhard W Breitbart; Kohelia Choudhury; Markus P Anders; Beate Volkmer; Rüdiger Greinert; Alexander Katalinic; Jürgen Tacke; Ulrich Keilholz
Journal:  Oncol Res Treat       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 2.825

5.  Risk factors and individual probabilities of melanoma for whites.

Authors:  Eunyoung Cho; Bernard A Rosner; Diane Feskanich; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Identifying Persons at Highest Risk of Melanoma Using Self-Assessed Risk Factors.

Authors:  Lisa H Williams; Andrew R Shors; William E Barlow; Cam Solomon; Emily White
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dermatol Res       Date:  2011

7.  Does skin cancer screening save lives?: an observational study comparing trends in melanoma mortality in regions with and without screening.

Authors:  Alexander Katalinic; Annika Waldmann; Martin A Weinstock; Alan C Geller; Nora Eisemann; Ruediger Greinert; Beate Volkmer; Eckhard Breitbart
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Detection of primary melanoma in individuals at extreme high risk: a prospective 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Fergal J Moloney; Pascale Guitera; Elliot Coates; Nikolas K Haass; Kenneth Ho; Ritta Khoury; Rachel L O'Connell; Leo Raudonikis; Helen Schmid; Graham J Mann; Scott W Menzies
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 10.282

9.  Skin cancer screening participation and impact on melanoma incidence in Germany--an observational study on incidence trends in regions with and without population-based screening.

Authors:  A Waldmann; S Nolte; M A Weinstock; E W Breitbart; N Eisemann; A C Geller; R Greinert; B Volkmer; A Katalinic
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Melanoma mortality following skin cancer screening in Germany.

Authors:  Mathieu Boniol; Philippe Autier; Sara Gandini
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  7 in total

1.  Estimating Overdiagnosis of Melanoma Using Trends Among Black and White Patients in the US.

Authors:  Adewole S Adamson; Elizabeth A Suarez; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 11.816

2.  One-year follow-up healthcare costs of patients diagnosed with skin cancer in Germany: a claims data analysis.

Authors:  Christian Speckemeier; Kathrin Pahmeier; Pietro Trocchi; Katrin Schuldt; Hildegard Lax; Michael Nonnemacher; Patrik Dröge; Andreas Stang; Jürgen Wasem; Silke Neusser
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 3.  Melanoma Early Detection: Big Data, Bigger Picture.

Authors:  Tracy Petrie; Ravikant Samatham; Alexander M Witkowski; Andre Esteva; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 8.551

4.  Physician skin cancer screening among U.S. military veterans: Results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Elliot J Coups; Baichen Xu; Carolyn J Heckman; Sharon L Manne; Jerod L Stapleton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Objectives, design and main findings until 2020 from the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  M Arfan Ikram; Guy Brusselle; Mohsen Ghanbari; André Goedegebure; M Kamran Ikram; Maryam Kavousi; Brenda C T Kieboom; Caroline C W Klaver; Robert J de Knegt; Annemarie I Luik; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Frank J A van Rooij; Bruno H Stricker; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Trudy Voortman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Increasing Participation Rates in Germany's Skin Cancer Screening Program (HELIOS): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Theresa Steeb; Markus V Heppt; Michael Erdmann; Anja Wessely; Stefanie J Klug; Carola Berking
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-12-13

7.  Technology-enabled activation of skin cancer screening for hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors and their primary care providers (TEACH).

Authors:  Saro H Armenian; Lanie Lindenfeld; Aleksi Iukuridze; Meagan Echevarria; Samantha Bebel; Catherine Coleman; Ryotaro Nakamura; Farah Abdullah; Badri Modi; Kevin C Oeffinger; Karen M Emmons; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Alan C Geller
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.