Literature DB >> 26480048

Does skin cancer screening save lives? A detailed analysis of mortality time trends in Schleswig-Holstein and Germany.

Andreas Stang1,2,3,4, Karl-Heinz Jöckel3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After a pilot study on skin cancer screening was performed between 2003 and 2004 in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, the country implemented what to the authors' knowledge is the first nationwide skin cancer screening program in the world in 2008. The objective of the current study was to provide details regarding mortality trends in Schleswig-Holstein and Germany in relation to the screening.
METHODS: Annual age-standardized mortality rates for skin melanoma (using the 10th Revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [ICD-10] code C43) and malignant neoplasms of ill-defined, secondary, and unspecified sites (ICD-10 code C76-C80) were analyzed. The European Standard population was used for age standardization. A bias analysis was performed to estimate the number of skin melanoma deaths that may have been incorrectly counted as ICD-10 code C76-C80 when the skin melanoma mortality declined in Schleswig-Holstein.
RESULTS: The observed mortality decline in Schleswig-Holstein 5 years after the pilot study was accompanied by a considerable increase in the number of deaths due to malignant neoplasms of ill-defined, secondary, and unspecified sites (ICD-10 code C76-C80) that is not explainable by an increase in the incidence of these neoplasms. Incorrect assignment of 8 to 35 and 12 to 23 skin melanoma deaths per year among men and women, respectively, as ICD-10 code C76-C80 during 2007 through 2010 could explain the transient skin melanoma mortality decline observed in Schleswig-Holstein. Five years after implementation of the program, the nationwide skin melanoma mortality increased (age-standardized rate change of +0.4 per 100,000 person-years [95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.6] in men and +0.1 per 100,000 person-years [95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 0.2] in women).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the current analyses raise doubts that the skin cancer screening program in Germany can reduce the skin cancer mortality rate, the authors do not believe the program should be immediately stopped. Further in-depth evaluations are required. Cancer 2016;122:432-437.
© 2015 American Cancer Society. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  incidence; mortality; neoplasms; screening; skin cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26480048     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

1.  Screening mammography: Authors' response to Nyström and Tabar and colleagues.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Michel Smans; Richard Sullivan; Peter Boyle
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Skin biopsy utilization and melanoma incidence among Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  M A Weinstock; J P Lott; Q Wang; L J Titus; T Onega; H D Nelson; L Pearson; M Piepkorn; R L Barnhill; J G Elmore; A N A Tosteson
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  Melanoma risk stratification of individuals with a high-risk naevus phenotype - A pilot study.

Authors:  Ayelet Rishpon; Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Stephen W Dusza; Gila Isman; Kivanc Kose; Allan C Halpern; Michael A Marchetti
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.875

4.  In Reply.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Bernd Kowall; Martin Schuler; Kaid Darwiche; Hilmar Kühl; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  State of the science on prevention and screening to reduce melanoma incidence and mortality: The time is now.

Authors:  Mary K Tripp; Meg Watson; Sophie J Balk; Susan M Swetter; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Environmental effects of ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2017.

Authors:  A F Bais; R M Lucas; J F Bornman; C E Williamson; B Sulzberger; A T Austin; S R Wilson; A L Andrady; G Bernhard; R L McKenzie; P J Aucamp; S Madronich; R E Neale; S Yazar; A R Young; F R de Gruijl; M Norval; Y Takizawa; P W Barnes; T M Robson; S A Robinson; C L Ballaré; S D Flint; P J Neale; S Hylander; K C Rose; S-Å Wängberg; D-P Häder; R C Worrest; R G Zepp; N D Paul; R M Cory; K R Solomon; J Longstreth; K K Pandey; H H Redhwi; A Torikai; A M Heikkilä
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Skin cancer rates in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany before and after the introduction of the nationwide skin cancer screening program (2000-2015).

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Oliver Heidinger
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 8.  Melanoma Early Detection: Big Data, Bigger Picture.

Authors:  Tracy Petrie; Ravikant Samatham; Alexander M Witkowski; Andre Esteva; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 9.  [Strategies for the noninvasive diagnosis of melanoma].

Authors:  C Fink; H A Haenssle
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.751

10.  Skin Cancer-The Importance of Prevention.

Authors:  Eleni Linos; Kenneth A Katz; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.