| Literature DB >> 29294206 |
Anne M Vangen-Lønne1,2,3, Peter Ueda4,5, Pablo Gulayin4,6, Tom Wilsgaard7, Ellisiv B Mathiesen8,9, Goodarz Danaei4,10.
Abstract
The effects of interventions on multiple lifestyle and metabolic risk factors, initiated in midlife or later in a healthy population, on the long-term risk of first-ever stroke is not known. A particular methodological challenge in observational studies is to estimate the unbiased effect of a time-varying exposure in presence of time-varying confounders, if those confounders are affected by prior exposure. In such cases, the parametric g-formula can be applied to estimate an unbiased effect. We applied the parametric g-formula to estimate the 18-years (1994-2012) cumulative stroke risk under different scenarios of hypothetical interventions on levels of blood pressure, cholesterol, weight, physical activity, smoking and alcohol intake; and compared these to the observed scenario, to calculate the population risk ratios and risk differences. Among 14,796 eligible participants in the prospective, population-based Tromsø study (baseline mean age 46.1 years, 51% women), the observed 18-years stroke risk was 5.9%. A feasible joint hypothetical intervention on six lifestyle and metabolic risk factors would reduce the 18-year stroke risk by 32% (95% confidence interval 16, 44). A combination of more intensive interventions reduced the estimated 18-years stroke risk by 64% (95% confidence interval 40, 80). Blood pressure reduction and quitting smoking significantly reduced the risk when applied separately.Entities:
Keywords: G-formula; Hypothetical interventions; Primary prevention; Risk factors; Stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29294206 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-017-0344-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Epidemiol ISSN: 0393-2990 Impact factor: 8.082