Literature DB >> 29293941

Impact of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Testing on Recovery of Enteric Bacterial Infections.

Aamer Imdad1, Fiona Retzer2, Linda S Thomas2, Marcy McMillian2, Katie Garman2, Peter F Rebeiro3, Stephen A Deppen4, John R Dunn2, Amy M Woron5.   

Abstract

Background: Culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) are increasingly used to identify enteric pathogens. However, foodborne illness surveillance systems have relied upon culture confirmation to estimate disease burden and identify outbreaks through molecular subtyping. This study examined the impacts of CIDT and estimated costs for culture verification of Shigella, Salmonella, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), and Campylobacter at the Tennessee Department of Health Public Health Laboratory (PHL).
Methods: This observational study included laboratory and epidemiological surveillance data collected between years 2013-2016 from patients with the reported enteric illness. We calculated pathogen recovery at PHL based on initial diagnostic test type reported at the clinical laboratory. Adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with modified Poisson regression. Estimates of cost were calculated for pathogen recovery from CIDT-positive specimens compared to recovery from culture-derived isolates.
Results: During the study period, PHL received 5553 specimens from clinical laboratories from patients with the enteric illness. Pathogen recovery was 57% (984/1713) from referred CIDT-positive stool specimens and 95% (3662/3840) from culture-derived isolates (PR, 0.61 [95% CI, .56-.66]). Pathogen recovery from CIDT-positive specimens varied based on pathogen type: Salmonella (72%), Shigella (64%), STEC (57%), and Campylobacter (26%). Compared to stool culture-derived isolates, the cost to recover pathogens from 100 CIDT-positive specimens was higher for Shigella (US $6192), Salmonella (US $18373), and STEC (US $27783). Conclusions: Pathogen recovery was low from CIDT-positive specimens for enteric bacteria. This has important implications for the current enteric disease surveillance system, outbreak detection, and costs for public health programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29293941      PMCID: PMC6248818          DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix1128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  27 in total

Review 1.  Multiplex Molecular Panels for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infection: Performance, Result Interpretation, and Cost-Effectiveness.

Authors:  Matthew J Binnicker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  New methods for detection of campylobacters in stool samples in comparison to culture.

Authors:  Emilie Bessède; Adline Delcamp; Elodie Sifré; Alice Buissonnière; Francis Mégraud
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  FoodNet: overview of a decade of achievement.

Authors:  Timothy F Jones; Elaine Scallan; Frederick J Angulo
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.171

4.  Real-time multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella, Shigella and Yersinia species in fecal samples.

Authors:  Dorothea Wiemer; Ulrike Loderstaedt; Hinrik von Wulffen; Simone Priesnitz; Marcellus Fischer; Egbert Tannich; Ralf Matthias Hagen
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  A cost benefit analysis of the Luminex xTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel for detection of infectious gastroenteritis in hospitalised patients.

Authors:  Simon D Goldenberg; Mariana Bacelar; Peter Brazier; Karen Bisnauthsing; Jonathan D Edgeworth
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 6.072

6.  University outbreak of calicivirus infection mistakenly attributed to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7--Virginia, 2000.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--major pathogens.

Authors:  Elaine Scallan; Robert M Hoekstra; Frederick J Angulo; Robert V Tauxe; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Sharon L Roy; Jeffery L Jones; Patricia M Griffin
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 8.  Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Jodi Woan-Fei Law; Nurul-Syakima Ab Mutalib; Kok-Gan Chan; Learn-Han Lee
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  A current overview of commercially available nucleic acid diagnostics approaches to detect and identify human gastroenteritis pathogens.

Authors:  Kate Reddington; Nina Tuite; Elizabeth Minogue; Thomas Barry
Journal:  Biomol Detect Quantif       Date:  2014-08-14

10.  Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio.

Authors:  Aluísio J D Barros; Vânia N Hirakata
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Is the Medium Still the Message? Culture-Independent Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infections.

Authors:  Neil Sood; Gary Carbell; Holly S Greenwald; Frank K Friedenberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Changing Diagnostic Testing Practices for Foodborne Pathogens, Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 2012-2019.

Authors:  Logan C Ray; Patricia M Griffin; Katie Wymore; Elisha Wilson; Sharon Hurd; Bethany LaClair; Sophia Wozny; Dana Eikmeier; Cyndy Nicholson; Kari Burzlaff; Julie Hatch; Melissa Fankhauser; Kristy Kubota; Jennifer Y Huang; Aimee Geissler; Daniel C Payne; Danielle M Tack
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.423

Review 3.  The Use of Bacteriophages in Biotechnology and Recent Insights into Proteomics.

Authors:  Ana G Abril; Mónica Carrera; Vicente Notario; Ángeles Sánchez-Pérez; Tomás G Villa
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  An Investigation of an Acute Gastroenteritis Outbreak: Cronobacter sakazakii, a Potential Cause of Food-Borne Illness.

Authors:  Wei Yong; Baofu Guo; Xiaochao Shi; Tingting Cheng; Mingming Chen; Xiao Jiang; Yanhua Ye; Junning Wang; Guoxiang Xie; Jie Ding
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Coverage of the national surveillance system for human Salmonella infections, Belgium, 2016-2020.

Authors:  Nina Van Goethem; An Van Den Bossche; Pieter-Jan Ceyssens; Adrien Lajot; Wim Coucke; Kris Vernelen; Nancy H C Roosens; Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker; Dieter Van Cauteren; Wesley Mattheus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Direct-from-Specimen Pathogen Identification: Evolution of Syndromic Panels.

Authors:  Marc Roger Couturier; Jennifer Dien Bard
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.935

7.  Comparison of Multiplex Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel and Conventional Stool Testing for Evaluation of Patients With HIV Infection.

Authors:  Juliana Sobczyk; Sonia Jain; Xiaoying Sun; Maile Karris; Darcy Wooten; Janet Stagnaro; Sharon Reed
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 8.  A Case of Postoperative Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Enterocolitis in an 81-Year-Old Man and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kapil Gururangan; Marisa K Holubar
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2020-09-29

Review 9.  Reporter Phage-Based Detection of Bacterial Pathogens: Design Guidelines and Recent Developments.

Authors:  Susanne Meile; Samuel Kilcher; Martin J Loessner; Matthew Dunne
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 5.048

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.