Literature DB >> 29290215

Predictors for dislodgment of vaginal pessary within one year in women with pelvic organ prolapse.

Rachel Y K Cheung1, Loreta L L Lee2, Tony K H Chung2, Symphorosa S C Chan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify clinical risk factors for dislodgment of vaginal pessary within one year in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study which recruited consecutive women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in a tertiary urogynecology center. Basic demographics, clinical symptoms and staging of pelvic organ prolapse were assessed. A vaginal pessary was offered where appropriate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics and clinical parameters were compared between women who were able to use a vaginal pessary for one year and those whose pessaries were dislodged within one year.
RESULTS: A total of 779 women were recruited and had a vaginal pessary inserted. Of them, 528 women, with a mean age of 64.7 (SD 10.1) years, returned for one-year follow-up; 177 (33.5%) had their pessary dislodged within one year and 351 (66.5%) had been able to retain the pessary. Stage III or IV prolapse (OR 1.76), prolapse predominant at the apical compartment (OR 2.14) and larger genital hiatus (OR 1.63) were factors associated with dislodgment of the vaginal pessary. Age, body mass index, previous hysterectomy and short vagina were not associated with dislodgment. Nevertheless, 47.6% of women with stage III/IV prolapse could still keep the pessary for one year.
CONCLUSION: Higher staging of prolapse, larger genital hiatus and apical compartment prolapse are clinical predictors for dislodgment of a vaginal pessary. Despite this, nearly half of women with stage III/IV prolapse were able to use a vaginal pessary for one year. Therefore, a vaginal pessary should be offered despite their staging of prolapse.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pelvic organ prolapse; Predictors; Vaginal pessary

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29290215     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  5 in total

1.  Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Quantification System.

Authors:  María Luisa Sánchez-Ferrer; María Teresa Prieto-Sánchez; Carlos Moya-Jiménez; Jaime Mendiola; Carmen María García-Hernández; Ana Carmona-Barnosi; Anibal Nieto; Alberto M Torres-Cantero
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Is it safe and effective to maintain the vaginal pessary without removing it for 2 consecutive years?

Authors:  Alessio Miceli; Manuel Fernández-Sánchez; Juan Polo-Padillo; José-Luis Dueñas-Díez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse: parameters associated with specific reasons for failure.

Authors:  Claudia Manzini; Carl Huub van der Vaart; Frieda van den Noort; Anique T M Grob; Mariëlla I J Withagen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Therapeutic Effects of 17β-Estradiol on Pelvic Organ Prolapse by Inhibiting Mfn2 Expression: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Xiao-Qing Wang; Rui-Ju He; Bing-Bing Xiao; Ye Lu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 5.  Parameters associated with unsuccessful pessary fitting for pelvic organ prolapse up to three months follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Manzini; Lisan M Morsinkhof; C Huub van der Vaart; Mariëlla I J Withagen; Anique T M Grob
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 1.932

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.