Siew Tzuh Tang1, Chen Hsiu Chen2, Fur-Hsing Wen3, Jen-Shi Chen4, Wen-Cheng Chang4, Chia-Hsun Hsieh4, Wen-Chi Chou4, Ming-Mo Hou4. 1. Chang Gung University, School of Nursing, Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan, ROC; Department of Nursing, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC; Division of Hematology-Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC. Electronic address: sttang@mail.cgu.edu.tw. 2. Department of Nursing, University of Kang Ning, Tainan, Taiwan, ROC. 3. Department of International Business, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. 4. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC; Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Terminally ill cancer patients do not engage in end-of-life (EOL) care discussions or do so only when death is imminent, despite guidelines for EOL care discussions early in their disease trajectory. Most studies on patient-reported EOL care discussions are cross sectional without exploring the evolution of EOL care discussions as death approaches. Cross-sectional studies cannot determine the direction of association between EOL care discussions and patients' prognostic awareness, psychological well-being, and quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVES/ METHODS: We examined the evolution and associations of accurate prognostic awareness, functional dependence, physical and psychological symptom distress, and QOL with patient-physician EOL care discussions among 256 terminally ill cancer patients in their last six months by hierarchical generalized linear modeling with logistic regression and by arranging time-varying modifiable variables and EOL care discussions in a distinct time sequence. RESULTS: The prevalence of physician-patient EOL care discussions increased as death approached (9.2%, 11.8%, and 18.3% for 91-180, 31-90, and 1-30 days before death, respectively) but only reached significance in the last month. Accurate prognostic awareness facilitated subsequent physician-patient EOL care discussions, whereas better patient-reported QOL and more anxiety symptoms hindered such discussions. The likelihood of EOL care discussions was not associated with levels of physical symptom distress, functional dependence, or depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Physician-patient EOL care discussions for terminally ill Taiwanese cancer patients remain uncommon even when death approaches. Physicians should facilitate EOL care discussions by cultivating patients' accurate prognostic awareness early in their cancer trajectory when they are physically and psychologically competent, with better QOL, thus promoting informed and value-based EOL care decision making.
CONTEXT: Terminally ill cancerpatients do not engage in end-of-life (EOL) care discussions or do so only when death is imminent, despite guidelines for EOL care discussions early in their disease trajectory. Most studies on patient-reported EOL care discussions are cross sectional without exploring the evolution of EOL care discussions as death approaches. Cross-sectional studies cannot determine the direction of association between EOL care discussions and patients' prognostic awareness, psychological well-being, and quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVES/ METHODS: We examined the evolution and associations of accurate prognostic awareness, functional dependence, physical and psychological symptom distress, and QOL with patient-physician EOL care discussions among 256 terminally ill cancerpatients in their last six months by hierarchical generalized linear modeling with logistic regression and by arranging time-varying modifiable variables and EOL care discussions in a distinct time sequence. RESULTS: The prevalence of physician-patient EOL care discussions increased as death approached (9.2%, 11.8%, and 18.3% for 91-180, 31-90, and 1-30 days before death, respectively) but only reached significance in the last month. Accurate prognostic awareness facilitated subsequent physician-patient EOL care discussions, whereas better patient-reported QOL and more anxiety symptoms hindered such discussions. The likelihood of EOL care discussions was not associated with levels of physical symptom distress, functional dependence, or depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Physician-patient EOL care discussions for terminally ill Taiwanese cancerpatients remain uncommon even when death approaches. Physicians should facilitate EOL care discussions by cultivating patients' accurate prognostic awareness early in their cancer trajectory when they are physically and psychologically competent, with better QOL, thus promoting informed and value-based EOL care decision making.
Authors: Bo Hu; Xiaomeng Yin; Chunyan Du; Hui Zhu; Zhanjun Gao; Xiuli Zhu; Jizhe Wang Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-08-28 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Heather M Derry; Andrew S Epstein; Wendy G Lichtenthal; Holly G Prigerson Journal: Expert Rev Anticancer Ther Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 4.512
Authors: Kah Poh Loh; Enrique Soto Pérez de Celis; Paul R Duberstein; Eva Culakova; Ronald M Epstein; Huiwen Xu; Sindhuja Kadambi; Marie Flannery; Allison Magnuson; Colin McHugh; Kelly M Trevino; Gina Tuch; Erika Ramsdale; Reza Yousefi-Nooraie; Margaret Sedenquist; Jane Jijun Liu; Nataliya Melnyk; Jodi Geer; Supriya G Mohile Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-10-09 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Diah Martina; Olaf P Geerse; Cheng-Pei Lin; Martina S Kristanti; Wichor M Bramer; Masanori Mori; Ida J Korfage; Agnes van der Heide; Judith Ac Rietjens; Carin Cd van der Rijt Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2021-09-06 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Rachel A Rodenbach; Andrew D Althouse; Yael Schenker; Thomas J Smith; Edward Chu; Douglas B White; Marie Bakitas; Robert M Arnold Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 3.612