Literature DB >> 29289642

Disparities in cigarette tax exposure by race, ethnicity, poverty status and sexual orientation, 2006-2014, USA.

Shelley D Golden1, Amanda Y Kong2, Joseph G L Lee3, Kurt M Ribisl4.   

Abstract

Cigarette excise taxes are an effective tobacco control strategy but they vary geographically due to differences in state and local taxation. There are also pronounced sociodemographic differences in community composition, suggesting that different population groups might face vastly different cigarette excise tax rates. In this study, we examine how cigarette excise tax rates differ for population groups defined by race, ethnicity, poverty status, and sexual orientation, and how these differences have evolved over time. We constructed annual cigarette tax rates in 109 mutually exclusive jurisdictions within the United States (U.S.) between 2006 and 2014. After merging with Census sociodemographic data, we calculated annual cigarette excise tax exposures for each population group as the average of each place-based tax, weighted by the proportion of the group living there. In 2014, the average U.S. resident was required to pay $2.68 in cigarette taxes, more than 60% of which was due to state and local taxation. On average, Asian/Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander populations faced the highest average tax ($2.95), which was $0.44 more than American Indian populations. Local taxes disproportionately augmented state and federal taxes for non-White populations, same-sex couples, and people living in poverty. Geographic variation in cigarette excise taxes produces sociodemographic variation in cigarette tax exposure. Raising cigarette taxes specifically in those places where groups at risk for tobacco-related disease are more likely to live, or otherwise creating geographically uniform tax levels, could reduce important disparities in cigarette smoking.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29289642      PMCID: PMC6030689          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  17 in total

1.  Cigarette demand: a meta-analysis of elasticities.

Authors:  Craig A Gallet; John A List
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Cigarette price minimization strategies in the United States: price reductions and responsiveness to excise taxes.

Authors:  Michael F Pesko; Andrea S Licht; Judy M Kruger
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Cigarette price minimization strategies used by adults.

Authors:  Michael F Pesko; Judy Kruger; Andrew Hyland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Making it harder to smoke and easier to quit: the effect of 10 years of tobacco control in New York City.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kilgore; Jenna Mandel-Ricci; Michael Johns; Micaela H Coady; Sarah B Perl; Andrew Goodman; Susan M Kansagra
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Patterns and causes of uncertainty in the American Community Survey.

Authors:  Seth E Spielman; David Folch; Nicholas Nagle
Journal:  Appl Geogr       Date:  2014-01

6.  Excise tax differences at Oklahoma smoke shops: an opportunity for inter-tribal coordination.

Authors:  Fritz L Laux; Frank J Chaloupka; Laura A Beebe
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2005-2015.

Authors:  Ahmed Jamal; Brian A King; Linda J Neff; Jennifer Whitmill; Stephen D Babb; Corinne M Graffunder
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 8.  Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: review of the evidence.

Authors:  Sarah Hill; Amanda Amos; David Clifford; Stephen Platt
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 9.  Beyond excise taxes: a systematic review of literature on non-tax policy approaches to raising tobacco product prices.

Authors:  Shelley D Golden; Margaret Holt Smith; Ellen C Feighery; April Roeseler; Todd Rogers; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 10.  What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews.

Authors:  Theo Lorenc; Mark Petticrew; Vivian Welch; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  7 in total

1.  Trend differences in men and women in rural and urban U.S. settings.

Authors:  A Cepeda-Benito; N J Doogan; R Redner; M E Roberts; A N Kurti; A C Villanti; A A Lopez; A J Quisenberry; C A Stanton; D E Gaalema; D R Keith; M A Parker; S T Higgins
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Are sexual minority adults differentially exposed to smoke-free laws and televised anti-tobacco media campaigns compared to the general US population? A descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Andrea R Titus; Kristi E Gamarel; James F Thrasher; Sherry L Emery; Michael R Elliott; Nancy L Fleischer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Sexual Orientation, Tobacco Use, and Tobacco Cessation Treatment-Seeking: Results From a National U.S. Survey.

Authors:  Sean Esteban McCabe; Brady T West; Alicia K Matthews; Rebecca Evans-Polce; Joseph G L Lee; Tonda L Hughes; Phil Veliz; Vita McCabe; Carol J Boyd
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 3.104

4.  Estimating the impact of state cigarette tax rates on smoking behavior: Addressing endogeneity using a natural experiment.

Authors:  Michael S Dunbar; Nancy Nicosia; Beau Kilmer
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 4.852

5.  Health-related regional and neighborhood correlates of sexual minority concentration: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph G L Lee; Thomas Wimark; Kasim S Ortiz; Kerry B Sewell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Substance Use among Economically Disadvantaged African American Older Adults; Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status.

Authors:  Shervin Assari; James Smith; Ritesh Mistry; Mehdi Farokhnia; Mohsen Bazargan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Exploring how tobacco advertisements are associated with tobacco use susceptibility in tobacco naive adolescents from the PATH study.

Authors:  Xiao Li; Jacob T Borodovsky; Erin Kasson; Nina Kaiser; Raven Riordan; Andrea Fentem; Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.018

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.