Literature DB >> 29288983

Automatic spinal cord localization, robust to MRI contrasts using global curve optimization.

Charley Gros1, Benjamin De Leener1, Sara M Dupont1, Allan R Martin2, Michael G Fehlings2, Rohit Bakshi3, Subhash Tummala3, Vincent Auclair4, Donald G McLaren4, Virginie Callot5, Julien Cohen-Adad6, Michaël Sdika7.   

Abstract

During the last two decades, MRI has been increasingly used for providing valuable quantitative information about spinal cord morphometry, such as quantification of the spinal cord atrophy in various diseases. However, despite the significant improvement of MR sequences adapted to the spinal cord, automatic image processing tools for spinal cord MRI data are not yet as developed as for the brain. There is nonetheless great interest in fully automatic and fast processing methods to be able to propose quantitative analysis pipelines on large datasets without user bias. The first step of most of these analysis pipelines is to detect the spinal cord, which is challenging to achieve automatically across the broad range of MRI contrasts, field of view, resolutions and pathologies. In this paper, a fully automated, robust and fast method for detecting the spinal cord centerline on MRI volumes is introduced. The algorithm uses a global optimization scheme that attempts to strike a balance between a probabilistic localization map of the spinal cord center point and the overall spatial consistency of the spinal cord centerline (i.e. the rostro-caudal continuity of the spinal cord). Additionally, a new post-processing feature, which aims to automatically split brain and spine regions is introduced, to be able to detect a consistent spinal cord centerline, independently from the field of view. We present data on the validation of the proposed algorithm, known as "OptiC", from a large dataset involving 20 centers, 4 contrasts (T2-weighted n = 287, T1-weighted n = 120, T2∗-weighted n = 307, diffusion-weighted n = 90), 501 subjects including 173 patients with a variety of neurologic diseases. Validation involved the gold-standard centerline coverage, the mean square error between the true and predicted centerlines and the ability to accurately separate brain and spine regions. Overall, OptiC was able to cover 98.77% of the gold-standard centerline, with a mean square error of 1.02 mm. OptiC achieved superior results compared to a state-of-the-art spinal cord localization technique based on the Hough transform, especially on pathological cases with an averaged mean square error of 1.08 mm vs. 13.16 mm (Wilcoxon signed-rank test p-value < .01). Images containing brain regions were identified with a 99% precision, on which brain and spine regions were separated with a distance error of 9.37 mm compared to ground-truth. Validation results on a challenging dataset suggest that OptiC could reliably be used for subsequent quantitative analyses tasks, opening the door to more robust analysis on pathological cases.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Detection; Global optimization; MRI; Machine learning; Segmentation; Spinal cord

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29288983     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2017.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  8 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Convolutional Neural Network-Based Automated Segmentation of the Spinal Cord and Contusion Injury: Deep Learning Biomarker Correlates of Motor Impairment in Acute Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  D B McCoy; S M Dupont; C Gros; J Cohen-Adad; R J Huie; A Ferguson; X Duong-Fernandez; L H Thomas; V Singh; J Narvid; L Pascual; N Kyritsis; M S Beattie; J C Bresnahan; S Dhall; W Whetstone; J F Talbott
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Spatial distribution of multiple sclerosis lesions in the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Dominique Eden; Charley Gros; Atef Badji; Sara M Dupont; Benjamin De Leener; Josefina Maranzano; Ren Zhuoquiong; Yaou Liu; Tobias Granberg; Russell Ouellette; Leszek Stawiarz; Jan Hillert; Jason Talbott; Elise Bannier; Anne Kerbrat; Gilles Edan; Pierre Labauge; Virginie Callot; Jean Pelletier; Bertrand Audoin; Henitsoa Rasoanandrianina; Jean-Christophe Brisset; Paola Valsasina; Maria A Rocca; Massimo Filippi; Rohit Bakshi; Shahamat Tauhid; Ferran Prados; Marios Yiannakas; Hugh Kearney; Olga Ciccarelli; Seth A Smith; Constantina Andrada Treaba; Caterina Mainero; Jennifer Lefeuvre; Daniel S Reich; Govind Nair; Timothy M Shepherd; Erik Charlson; Yasuhiko Tachibana; Masaaki Hori; Kouhei Kamiya; Lydia Chougar; Sridar Narayanan; Julien Cohen-Adad
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 4.  Utility of machine learning algorithms in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mark E Stephens; Christen M O'Neal; Alison M Westrup; Fauziyya Y Muhammad; Daniel M McKenzie; Andrew H Fagg; Zachary A Smith
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Automated Cervical Spinal Cord Segmentation in Real-World MRI of Multiple Sclerosis Patients by Optimized Hybrid Residual Attention-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  América Bueno; Ignacio Bosch; Alejandro Rodríguez; Ana Jiménez; Joan Carreres; Matías Fernández; Luis Marti-Bonmati; Angel Alberich-Bayarri
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.903

6.  Generic acquisition protocol for quantitative MRI of the spinal cord.

Authors:  Julien Cohen-Adad; Eva Alonso-Ortiz; Mihael Abramovic; Carina Arneitz; Nicole Atcheson; Laura Barlow; Robert L Barry; Markus Barth; Marco Battiston; Christian Büchel; Matthew Budde; Virginie Callot; Anna J E Combes; Benjamin De Leener; Maxime Descoteaux; Paulo Loureiro de Sousa; Marek Dostál; Julien Doyon; Adam Dvorak; Falk Eippert; Karla R Epperson; Kevin S Epperson; Patrick Freund; Jürgen Finsterbusch; Alexandru Foias; Michela Fratini; Issei Fukunaga; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Giancarlo Germani; Guillaume Gilbert; Federico Giove; Charley Gros; Francesco Grussu; Akifumi Hagiwara; Pierre-Gilles Henry; Tomáš Horák; Masaaki Hori; James Joers; Kouhei Kamiya; Haleh Karbasforoushan; Miloš Keřkovský; Ali Khatibi; Joo-Won Kim; Nawal Kinany; Hagen Kitzler; Shannon Kolind; Yazhuo Kong; Petr Kudlička; Paul Kuntke; Nyoman D Kurniawan; Slawomir Kusmia; René Labounek; Maria Marcella Laganà; Cornelia Laule; Christine S Law; Christophe Lenglet; Tobias Leutritz; Yaou Liu; Sara Llufriu; Sean Mackey; Eloy Martinez-Heras; Loan Mattera; Igor Nestrasil; Kristin P O'Grady; Nico Papinutto; Daniel Papp; Deborah Pareto; Todd B Parrish; Anna Pichiecchio; Ferran Prados; Àlex Rovira; Marc J Ruitenberg; Rebecca S Samson; Giovanni Savini; Maryam Seif; Alan C Seifert; Alex K Smith; Seth A Smith; Zachary A Smith; Elisabeth Solana; Yuichi Suzuki; George Tackley; Alexandra Tinnermann; Jan Valošek; Dimitri Van De Ville; Marios C Yiannakas; Kenneth A Weber; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Richard G Wise; Patrik O Wyss; Junqian Xu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 17.021

7.  Activity-dependent spinal cord neuromodulation rapidly restores trunk and leg motor functions after complete paralysis.

Authors:  Andreas Rowald; Salif Komi; Robin Demesmaeker; Edeny Baaklini; Sergio Daniel Hernandez-Charpak; Edoardo Paoles; Hazael Montanaro; Antonino Cassara; Fabio Becce; Bryn Lloyd; Taylor Newton; Jimmy Ravier; Nawal Kinany; Marina D'Ercole; Aurélie Paley; Nicolas Hankov; Camille Varescon; Laura McCracken; Molywan Vat; Miroslav Caban; Anne Watrin; Charlotte Jacquet; Léa Bole-Feysot; Cathal Harte; Henri Lorach; Andrea Galvez; Manon Tschopp; Natacha Herrmann; Moïra Wacker; Lionel Geernaert; Isabelle Fodor; Valentin Radevich; Katrien Van Den Keybus; Grégoire Eberle; Etienne Pralong; Maxime Roulet; Jean-Baptiste Ledoux; Eleonora Fornari; Stefano Mandija; Loan Mattera; Roberto Martuzzi; Bruno Nazarian; Stefan Benkler; Simone Callegari; Nathan Greiner; Benjamin Fuhrer; Martijn Froeling; Nik Buse; Tim Denison; Rik Buschman; Christian Wende; Damien Ganty; Jurriaan Bakker; Vincent Delattre; Hendrik Lambert; Karen Minassian; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Anne Kavounoudias; Silvestro Micera; Dimitri Van De Ville; Quentin Barraud; Erkan Kurt; Niels Kuster; Esra Neufeld; Marco Capogrosso; Leonie Asboth; Fabien B Wagner; Jocelyne Bloch; Grégoire Courtine
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 87.241

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Yangyang Cui; Jia Zhu; Zhili Duan; Zhenhua Liao; Song Wang; Weiqiang Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.614

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.