Literature DB >> 29288654

Race and ethnicity may not be associated with risk of unintended pregnancy.

Shakkaura Kemet1, Lisbet S Lundsberg2, Aileen M Gariepy3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to use improved measures and methodology to investigate whether race and ethnicity are associated with unintended pregnancy. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of English- or Spanish-speaking women, aged 16-44, with pregnancies <24weeks' gestation recruited from pregnancy testing and abortion care sites in New Haven, CT, between June 2014 and June 2015. Participants completed self-assessments of race, ethnicity and multidimensional measures of pregnancy "context," including timing, intention, wantedness, desirability, happiness and planning (measured with the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy). Multivariable analysis was performed, adjusting for maternal demographics, language, recruitment site, substance use and medical conditions including history of depression.
RESULTS: Among 161 participants (mean age=27.2±6.6years), mean gestational age was 9±4.6weeks. Overall, 14% self-identified as White non-Hispanic, 37% Black non-Hispanic, 42% Hispanic and 7% multiracial. Most (85%) were unmarried, and 75% had at least one child. After adjustment, happiness about new pregnancies was more likely among Black non-Hispanic than White non-Hispanic women OR=5.66 (95%CI: 1.51-21.20). Neither race nor ethnicity was significantly associated with pregnancy intention, wantedness, planning, timing or desirability.
CONCLUSION: In a diverse cohort with multiple, antenatal measures of pregnancy context, neither race nor ethnicity is significantly associated with unintended pregnancy, as previous studies reported. Black non-Hispanic women were more likely to report happiness about new pregnancies than White non-Hispanic women. This study improves upon previous analyses that used retrospective and limited assessments of pregnancy intention, excluded women with miscarriages or abortions, and lacked adjustment for confounding. IMPLICATIONS: Evaluation of multidimensional pregnancy contexts assessed antenatally is important and may capture the experiences of women more accurately, especially Black and Hispanic women.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethnicity; London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy; Pregnancy intention; Race; Unplanned pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29288654      PMCID: PMC5840000          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  31 in total

1.  Pregnancy intention, demographic differences, and psychosocial health.

Authors:  Pamela Maxson; Marie Lynn Miranda
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  "It just happens": a qualitative study exploring low-income women's perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Cara Nikolajski; Julia R Steinberg; Lori Freedman; Aletha Y Akers; Said Ibrahim; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy.

Authors:  G Barrett; S C Smith; K Wellings
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Unintended Pregnancy: Evidence From a National Sample of U.S. Women.

Authors:  Theresa Y Kim; Rada K Dagher; Jie Chen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Unintended pregnancy and associated maternal preconception, prenatal and postpartum behaviors.

Authors:  Diana Cheng; Eleanor B Schwarz; Erika Douglas; Isabelle Horon
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  ACOG Committee opinion no. 554: reproductive and sexual coercion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Unintended pregnancy and prenatal behaviors among urban, black women in Baltimore, Maryland: the Baltimore preterm birth study.

Authors:  Suezanne T Orr; Sherman A James; Jerome P Reiter
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Rethinking the Pregnancy Planning Paradigm: Unintended Conceptions or Unrepresentative Concepts?

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; Sonya Borrero; Lisa S Callegari; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2016-08-11

9.  Happiness about unintended pregnancy and its relationship to contraceptive desires among a predominantly Latina cohort.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-06-11

Review 10.  Reproductive health disparities: a focus on family planning and prevention among minority women and adolescents.

Authors:  Sadia Haider; Cynthia Stoffel; Geri Donenberg; Stacie Geller
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2013-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Rachel Paul; Ragini Maddipati; Christina Buckel; Melody Goodman; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Reproductive Life Goals: A Systematic Review of Pregnancy Planning Intentions, Needs, and Interventions Among Women Involved in U.S. Criminal Justice Systems.

Authors:  Emily Hoff; Zoe M Adams; Alyssa Grimshaw; Dawn A Goddard-Eckrich; Anindita Dasgupta; Sangini S Sheth; Jaimie P Meyer
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Black-White Differences in Pregnancy Desire During the Transition to Adulthood.

Authors:  Jennifer S Barber; Karen Benjamin Guzzo; Jamie Budnick; Yasamin Kusunoki; Sarah R Hayford; Warren Miller
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  Efficacy of the 1-year (13-cycle) segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system: results of two multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials.

Authors:  David F Archer; Ruth B Merkatz; Luis Bahamondes; Carolyn L Westhoff; Philip Darney; Dan Apter; Jeffrey T Jensen; Vivian Brache; Anita L Nelson; Erika Banks; György Bártfai; David J Portman; Marlena Plagianos; Clint Dart; Narender Kumar; George W Creasy; Regine Sitruk-Ware; Diana L Blithe
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 26.763

5.  Association of race and ethnicity with postpartum contraceptive method choice, receipt, and subsequent pregnancy.

Authors:  David Ngendahimana; Jessica Amalraj; Barbara Wilkinson; Emily Verbus; Mary Montague; Jane Morris; Kavita Shah Arora
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.