Literature DB >> 29288495

PanCancer insights from The Cancer Genome Atlas: the pathologist's perspective.

Lee Ad Cooper1,2,3, Elizabeth G Demicco4, Joel H Saltz5, Reid T Powell6, Arvind Rao7,8, Alexander J Lazar9.   

Abstract

The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) represents one of several international consortia dedicated to performing comprehensive genomic and epigenomic analyses of selected tumour types to advance our understanding of disease and provide an open-access resource for worldwide cancer research. Thirty-three tumour types (selected by histology or tissue of origin, to include both common and rare diseases), comprising >11 000 specimens, were subjected to DNA sequencing, copy number and methylation analysis, and transcriptomic, proteomic and histological evaluation. Each cancer type was analysed individually to identify tissue-specific alterations, and make correlations across different molecular platforms. The final dataset was then normalized and combined for the PanCancer Initiative, which seeks to identify commonalities across different cancer types or cells of origin/lineage, or within anatomically or morphologically related groups. An important resource generated along with the rich molecular studies is an extensive digital pathology slide archive, composed of frozen section tissue directly related to the tissues analysed as part of TCGA, and representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded, haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained diagnostic slides. These H&E image resources have primarily been used to verify diagnoses and histological subtypes with some limited extraction of standard pathological variables such as mitotic activity, grade, and lymphocytic infiltrates. Largely overlooked is the richness of these scanned images for more sophisticated feature extraction approaches coupled with machine learning, and ultimately correlation with molecular features and clinical endpoints. Here, we document initial attempts to exploit TCGA imaging archives, and describe some of the tools, and the rapidly evolving image analysis/feature extraction landscape. Our hope is to inform, and ultimately inspire and challenge, the pathology and cancer research communities to exploit these imaging resources so that the full potential of this integral platform of TCGA can be used to complement and enhance the insightful integrated analyses from the genomic and epigenomic platforms.
Copyright © 2017 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2017 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PanCancer; TCGA; The Cancer Genome Atlas; computational histology; digital pathology; genomics; image analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29288495      PMCID: PMC6240356          DOI: 10.1002/path.5028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  50 in total

1.  Computerized pathological image analysis for neuroblastoma prognosis.

Authors:  Metin N Gurcan; Jun Kong; Olcay Sertel; B Barla Cambazoglu; Joel Saltz; Umit Catalyurek
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2007-10-11

Review 2.  Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes in cancer: emerging therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Roodolph St Pierre; Cigall Kadoch
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  EGFR-mediated re-activation of MAPK signaling contributes to insensitivity of BRAF mutant colorectal cancers to RAF inhibition with vemurafenib.

Authors:  Ryan B Corcoran; Hiromichi Ebi; Alexa B Turke; Erin M Coffee; Michiya Nishino; Alexandria P Cogdill; Ronald D Brown; Patricia Della Pelle; Dora Dias-Santagata; Kenneth E Hung; Keith T Flaherty; Adriano Piris; Jennifer A Wargo; Jeffrey Settleman; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Jeffrey A Engelman
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 39.397

4.  A Containerized Software System for Generation, Management, and Exploration of Features from Whole Slide Tissue Images.

Authors:  Joel Saltz; Ashish Sharma; Ganesh Iyer; Erich Bremer; Feiqiao Wang; Alina Jasniewski; Tammy DiPrima; Jonas S Almeida; Yi Gao; Tianhao Zhao; Mary Saltz; Tahsin Kurc
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Primary sarcomas of the kidney. A clinicopathologic and DNA flow cytometric study of 17 cases.

Authors:  D J Grignon; A G Ayala; J Y Ro; A el-Naggar; N J Papadopoulos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Vemurafenib in patients with BRAF(V600E)-positive metastatic or unresectable papillary thyroid cancer refractory to radioactive iodine: a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Marcia S Brose; Maria E Cabanillas; Ezra E W Cohen; Lori J Wirth; Todd Riehl; Huibin Yue; Steven I Sherman; Eric J Sherman
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Cancer Digital Slide Archive: an informatics resource to support integrated in silico analysis of TCGA pathology data.

Authors:  David A Gutman; Jake Cobb; Dhananjaya Somanna; Yuna Park; Fusheng Wang; Tahsin Kurc; Joel H Saltz; Daniel J Brat; Lee A D Cooper
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Graham R Bignell; Charles Cox; Philip Stephens; Sarah Edkins; Sheila Clegg; Jon Teague; Hayley Woffendin; Mathew J Garnett; William Bottomley; Neil Davis; Ed Dicks; Rebecca Ewing; Yvonne Floyd; Kristian Gray; Sarah Hall; Rachel Hawes; Jaime Hughes; Vivian Kosmidou; Andrew Menzies; Catherine Mould; Adrian Parker; Claire Stevens; Stephen Watt; Steven Hooper; Rebecca Wilson; Hiran Jayatilake; Barry A Gusterson; Colin Cooper; Janet Shipley; Darren Hargrave; Katherine Pritchard-Jones; Norman Maitland; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Giuseppe Palmieri; Antonio Cossu; Adrienne Flanagan; Andrew Nicholson; Judy W C Ho; Suet Y Leung; Siu T Yuen; Barbara L Weber; Hilliard F Seigler; Timothy L Darrow; Hugh Paterson; Richard Marais; Christopher J Marshall; Richard Wooster; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Identifying survival associated morphological features of triple negative breast cancer using multiple datasets.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Thierry Pécot; Debra L Zynger; Raghu Machiraju; Charles L Shapiro; Kun Huang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma: final overall survival results of the randomized BRIM-3 study.

Authors:  P B Chapman; C Robert; J Larkin; J B Haanen; A Ribas; D Hogg; O Hamid; P A Ascierto; A Testori; P C Lorigan; R Dummer; J A Sosman; K T Flaherty; I Chang; S Coleman; I Caro; A Hauschild; G A McArthur
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  50 in total

1.  An image dataset related to automated macrophage detection in immunostained lymphoma tissue samples.

Authors:  Marcus Wagner; Sarah Reinke; René Hänsel; Wolfram Klapper; Ulf-Dietrich Braumann
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 2.  Report on computational assessment of Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group.

Authors:  Mohamed Amgad; Elisabeth Specht Stovgaard; Eva Balslev; Jeppe Thagaard; Weijie Chen; Sarah Dudgeon; Ashish Sharma; Jennifer K Kerner; Carsten Denkert; Yinyin Yuan; Khalid AbdulJabbar; Stephan Wienert; Peter Savas; Leonie Voorwerk; Andrew H Beck; Anant Madabhushi; Johan Hartman; Manu M Sebastian; Hugo M Horlings; Jan Hudeček; Francesco Ciompi; David A Moore; Rajendra Singh; Elvire Roblin; Marcelo Luiz Balancin; Marie-Christine Mathieu; Jochen K Lennerz; Pawan Kirtani; I-Chun Chen; Jeremy P Braybrooke; Giancarlo Pruneri; Sandra Demaria; Sylvia Adams; Stuart J Schnitt; Sunil R Lakhani; Federico Rojo; Laura Comerma; Sunil S Badve; Mehrnoush Khojasteh; W Fraser Symmans; Christos Sotiriou; Paula Gonzalez-Ericsson; Katherine L Pogue-Geile; Rim S Kim; David L Rimm; Giuseppe Viale; Stephen M Hewitt; John M S Bartlett; Frédérique Penault-Llorca; Shom Goel; Huang-Chun Lien; Sibylle Loibl; Zuzana Kos; Sherene Loi; Matthew G Hanna; Stefan Michiels; Marleen Kok; Torsten O Nielsen; Alexander J Lazar; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Loes F S Kooreman; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Joel Saltz; Brandon D Gallas; Uday Kurkure; Michael Barnes; Roberto Salgado; Lee A D Cooper
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-05-12

3.  Integrative Molecular Analysis of Patients With Advanced and Metastatic Cancer.

Authors:  Verena Sailer; Kenneth Wa Eng; Tuo Zhang; Rohan Bareja; David J Pisapia; Alexandros Sigaras; Bhavneet Bhinder; Alessandro Romanel; David Wilkes; Evan Sticca; Joanna Cyrta; Rema Rao; Sheena Sahota; Chantal Pauli; Shaham Beg; Samaneh Motanagh; Myriam Kossai; Jacqueline Fontunge; Loredana Puca; Hanna Rennert; Jenny Zhaoying Xiang; Noah Greco; Rob Kim; Theresa Y MacDonald; Terra McNary; Mirjam Blattner-Johnson; Marc H Schiffman; Bishoy M Faltas; Jeffrey P Greenfield; David Rickman; Eleni Andreopoulou; Kevin Holcomb; Linda T Vahdat; Douglas S Scherr; Koen van Besien; Christopher E Barbieri; Brian D Robinson; Howard Alan Fine; Allyson J Ocean; Ana Molina; Manish A Shah; David M Nanus; Qiulu Pan; Francesca Demichelis; Scott T Tagawa; Wei Song; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Andrea Sboner; Mark A Rubin; Olivier Elemento; Himisha Beltran
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-09-20

4.  Pan-cancer computational histopathology reveals mutations, tumor composition and prognosis.

Authors:  Yu Fu; Alexander W Jung; Ramon Viñas Torne; Santiago Gonzalez; Harald Vöhringer; Artem Shmatko; Lucy R Yates; Mercedes Jimenez-Linan; Luiza Moore; Moritz Gerstung
Journal:  Nat Cancer       Date:  2020-07-27

5.  Deep Learning for Survival Analysis in Breast Cancer with Whole Slide Image Data.

Authors:  Huidong Liu; Tahsin Kurc
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 6.931

6.  Lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer is associated with gene expression signatures of cell proliferation but not lymphangiogenesis or immune response.

Authors:  Mariko Asaoka; Santosh K Patnaik; Frank Zhang; Takashi Ishikawa; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: recent updates in genetics, biochemistry, immunohistochemistry, metabolomics, imaging and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Karren Antonio; Ma Margarita Noreen Valdez; Leilani Mercado-Asis; David Taïeb; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-02

8.  Feasibility of fully automated classification of whole slide images based on deep learning.

Authors:  Kyung-Ok Cho; Sung Hak Lee; Hyun-Jong Jang
Journal:  Korean J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 2.016

9.  Spatial Organization and Molecular Correlation of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Using Deep Learning on Pathology Images.

Authors:  Joel Saltz; Rajarsi Gupta; Le Hou; Tahsin Kurc; Pankaj Singh; Vu Nguyen; Dimitris Samaras; Kenneth R Shroyer; Tianhao Zhao; Rebecca Batiste; John Van Arnam; Ilya Shmulevich; Arvind U K Rao; Alexander J Lazar; Ashish Sharma; Vésteinn Thorsson
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Long non‑coding RNA NEAT1 regulates glioma cell proliferation and apoptosis by competitively binding to microRNA‑324‑5p and upregulating KCTD20 expression.

Authors:  Jiale Zhang; Yangyang Li; Yuqi Liu; Guangzhi Xu; Yue Hei; Xiaoming Lu; Weiping Liu
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.906

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.