| Literature DB >> 29288250 |
Jenny E Han1,2, Jessica A Alvarez3, Bashar Staitieh4,5, Vin Tangpricha3,6, Li Hao3, Thomas R Ziegler3,6, Greg S Martin4,5, Lou Ann S Brown7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29288250 PMCID: PMC5948109 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-017-0047-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr ISSN: 0954-3007 Impact factor: 4.016
Figure 1Glutathione and Cysteine Redox Equipoise
Both amino acids undergo reversible oxidation to form disulfides
Baseline Demographic and Plasma Redox Variables by Treatment Group
| Variable | All | Placebo | Vitamin D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 63.5 ± 17.3 | 64.8 ± 17.5 | 64.0 ± 17.7 | 0.87 |
| Male | 6 (60) | 13 (65) | 0.78 | |
| African American | 12 (40) | 4 (40) | 10 (50) | 0.10 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 30.6 ± 7.59 | 28.2 ± 9.9 | 31.5 ± 6.4 | 0.39 |
| APACHE II | 21 ± 9 | 23.2 ± 8.8 | 20 ± 9 | 0.37 |
| Infection on Admission | 13 (43) | 6 (60) | 7 (35) | 0.17 |
| Plasma 25(OH)D (ng/mL) | 21.4 ± 9.1 | 21.5 ± 12.2 | 21.1 ± 7.9 | 0.75 |
| 25(OH)D <20 ng/mL | 13 (43) | 5 (50) | 8 (40) | 0.59 |
| 25(OH)D <30 ng/mL | 25 (83) | 8 (80) | 17 (85) | 0.73 |
| Cys (μM) | 1.11 (0.60, 2.61) | 1.36 (0.69, 8.34) | 0.98 (0.57, 1.80) | 0.40 |
| CySS (μM) | 7.05 (4.60, 9.07) | 6.62 (4.26, 12.34) | 7.25 (4.24, 8.87) | 0.77 |
| %CySS | 83.42 (73.70, 93.20) | 82.32 (50.42, 94.03) | 85.74 (72.47, 90.16) | 0.88 |
| EhCySS (mV) | −51.16 ± 31.21 | −54.79 ± 46.39 | −49.34 ± 21.59 | 0.68 |
| GSH (μM) | 0.21 (0.07, 0.35) | 0.21 (0.08, 0.72) | 0.21 (0.07, 0.32) | 0.63 |
| GSSG (μM) | 0.04 (0.008, 0.24) | 0.04 (0.007, 0.22) | 0.09 (0.009, 0.30) | 0.46 |
| %GSSG | 34.18 (3.19, 66.05) | 11.53 (2.00, 59.90) | 40.31 (7.84, 67.63) | 0.37 |
| EhGSSG (mV) | −75.71 ± 40.94 | −88.20 ± 42.13 | −69.47 ± 40.05 | 0.27 |
Data reported as N (%), mean ± SD for normal distributions, or median (IQR) for non-normal distributions.
N = 27 for plasma redox outcomes (n = 9 for placebo group, n = 18 for vitamin D group).
Comparison of Baseline Plasma and Alveolar Oxidative Stressa
| Plasma | BALF | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cys (μM) | 0.94 (0.66, 2.95) | 0.06 (0.01, 0.11) | |
| CySS (μM) | 7.05 (3.86, 10.12) | 0.05 (0.01, 0.21) | |
| %CySS | 83.42 (60.68, 93.21) | 56.03 (33.44, 62.21) | |
| EhCySS (mV) | −42.77 (−77.85, −34.00) | −23.96 (−38.38, −8.05) | |
| GSH (μM) | 0.26 (0.08, 0.51) | 0.08 (0.02, 0.19) | 0.22 |
| GSSG (μM) | 0.13 (0.02, 0.64) | 0.03 (0.02, 0.05) | |
| %GSSG | 60.89 (3.76, 77.73) | 37.07 (20.30, 69.58) | 0.85 |
| EhGSSG (mV) | −62.80 (−116.44, −32.99) | −39.07 (−70.05, −13.76) | 0.10 |
N= 17 subjects with paired plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples
Spearman Correlations Between Systemic Oxidation Stress and Alveolar Macrophage Phagocytosis
| Phagocytosis Index | Percent of cells phagocytosis-positive | |
|---|---|---|
| Plasma Cys | − | |
| Plasma CySS | 0.23 (0.39) | 0.16 (0.55) |
| Plasma %CySS | 0.44 (0.09) | |
| Plasma EhCySS | 0.46 (0.07) | |
| Plasma GSH | −0.06 (0.81) | −0.30 (0.25) |
| Plasma GSSG | −0.26 (0.32) | −0.39 (0.13) |
| Plasma %GSSG | −0.06 (0.83) | −0.13 (0.63) |
| Plasma EhGSSG | 0.13 (0.64) | 0.11 (0.70) |
Spearman Correlations. N=17
Figure 2Plasma GSH/GSSG redox outcomes over time in critically ill adults
Data are shown as least squares (LS) mean ± SEM on back-transformed data. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effect models with Tukey’s post-hoc analyses. Points not connected by the same letter indicate statistically significant differences. N=20 on day 0 and 7, n=15 on day 14. a) Plasma GSH concentrations. The time effect was statistically significant (P= 0.001). The treatment and treatment-by-time effects were not statistically significant (P = 0.22 and 0.98, respectively). b) Plasma GSSG concentrations. The treatment-by-time effect was statistically significant (P = 0.009). The treatment and time effects were not statistically significant (P = 0.18 and 0.74, respectively). c) Plasma EhGSSG. The time effect was statistically significant (P= 0.009). The treatment and treatment-by-time effects were not statistically significant (P = 0.18 and 0.74, respectively).