Karin Amrein1, Christian Schnedl1, Alexander Holl2, Regina Riedl3, Kenneth B Christopher4, Christoph Pachler5, Tadeja Urbanic Purkart6, Andreas Waltensdorfer5, Andreas Münch5, Helga Warnkross1, Tatjana Stojakovic7, Egbert Bisping8, Wolfgang Toller5, Karl-Heinz Smolle9, Andrea Berghold3, Thomas R Pieber1, Harald Dobnig10. 1. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria. 2. Division of Neurogeriatrics, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Austria. 3. Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics, and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Austria. 4. Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria. 6. Division of General Neurology, Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Austria. 7. Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Austria. 8. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria. 9. Medical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria. 10. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria10Schilddrüsen-Endokrinologie-Osteoporose Institut Dobnig GmbH, Graz, Austria.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Low vitamin D status is linked to increased mortality and morbidity in patients who are critically ill. It is unknown if this association is causal. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a vitamin D3 treatment regimen intended to restore and maintain normal vitamin D status over 6 months is of health benefit for patients in ICUs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center trial, conducted from May 2010 through September 2012 at 5 ICUs that included a medical and surgical population of 492 critically ill adult white patients with vitamin D deficiency (≤20 ng/mL) assigned to receive eithervitamin D3 (n = 249) or a placebo (n = 243). INTERVENTIONS:Vitamin D3 or placebo was given orally or via nasogastric tube once at a dose of 540,000 IU followed by monthly maintenance doses of 90,000 IU for 5 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was hospital length of stay. Secondary outcomes included, among others, length of ICU stay, the percentage of patients with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels higher than 30 ng/mL at day 7, hospital mortality, and 6-month mortality. A predefined severe vitamin D deficiency (≤12 ng/mL) subgroup analysis was specified before data unblinding and analysis. RESULTS:A total of 475 patients were included in the final analysis (237 in the vitamin D3 group and 238 in the placebo group). The median (IQR) length of hospital stay was not significantly different between groups (20.1 days [IQR, 11.1-33.3] for vitamin D3 vs 19.3 days [IQR, 11.1-34.9] for placebo; P = .98). Hospital mortality and 6-month mortality were also not significantly different (hospital mortality: 28.3% [95% CI, 22.6%-34.5%] for vitamin D3 vs 35.3% [95% CI, 29.2%-41.7%] for placebo; hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.58-1.11]; P = .18; 6-month mortality: 35.0% [95% CI, 29.0%-41.5%] for vitamin D3 vs 42.9% [95% CI, 36.5%-49.4%] for placebo; HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.58-1.04]; P = .09). For the severe vitamin D deficiency subgroup analysis (n = 200), length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the 2 study groups: 20.1 days (IQR, 12.9-39.1) for vitamin D3 vs 19.0 days (IQR, 11.6-33.8) for placebo. Hospital mortality was significantly lower with 28 deaths among 98 patients (28.6% [95% CI, 19.9%-38.6%]) for vitamin D3 compared with 47 deaths among 102 patients (46.1% [95% CI, 36.2%-56.2%]) for placebo (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.35-0.90], P for interaction = .04), but not 6-month mortality (34.7% [95% CI, 25.4%-45.0%] for vitamin D3 vs 50.0% [95% CI, 39.9%-60.1%] for placebo; HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.93], P for interaction = .12). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among critically ill patients with vitamin D deficiency, administration of high-dose vitamin D3 compared with placebo did not reduce hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, or 6-month mortality. Lower hospital mortality was observed in the severe vitamin D deficiency subgroup, but this finding should be considered hypothesis generating and requires further study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01130181.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Low vitamin D status is linked to increased mortality and morbidity in patients who are critically ill. It is unknown if this association is causal. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a vitamin D3 treatment regimen intended to restore and maintain normal vitamin D status over 6 months is of health benefit for patients in ICUs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center trial, conducted from May 2010 through September 2012 at 5 ICUs that included a medical and surgical population of 492 critically ill adult white patients with vitamin D deficiency (≤20 ng/mL) assigned to receive either vitamin D3 (n = 249) or a placebo (n = 243). INTERVENTIONS:Vitamin D3 or placebo was given orally or via nasogastric tube once at a dose of 540,000 IU followed by monthly maintenance doses of 90,000 IU for 5 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was hospital length of stay. Secondary outcomes included, among others, length of ICU stay, the percentage of patients with 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels higher than 30 ng/mL at day 7, hospital mortality, and 6-month mortality. A predefined severe vitamin D deficiency (≤12 ng/mL) subgroup analysis was specified before data unblinding and analysis. RESULTS: A total of 475 patients were included in the final analysis (237 in the vitamin D3 group and 238 in the placebo group). The median (IQR) length of hospital stay was not significantly different between groups (20.1 days [IQR, 11.1-33.3] for vitamin D3 vs 19.3 days [IQR, 11.1-34.9] for placebo; P = .98). Hospital mortality and 6-month mortality were also not significantly different (hospital mortality: 28.3% [95% CI, 22.6%-34.5%] for vitamin D3 vs 35.3% [95% CI, 29.2%-41.7%] for placebo; hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.58-1.11]; P = .18; 6-month mortality: 35.0% [95% CI, 29.0%-41.5%] for vitamin D3 vs 42.9% [95% CI, 36.5%-49.4%] for placebo; HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.58-1.04]; P = .09). For the severe vitamin D deficiency subgroup analysis (n = 200), length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the 2 study groups: 20.1 days (IQR, 12.9-39.1) for vitamin D3 vs 19.0 days (IQR, 11.6-33.8) for placebo. Hospital mortality was significantly lower with 28 deaths among 98 patients (28.6% [95% CI, 19.9%-38.6%]) for vitamin D3 compared with 47 deaths among 102 patients (46.1% [95% CI, 36.2%-56.2%]) for placebo (HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.35-0.90], P for interaction = .04), but not 6-month mortality (34.7% [95% CI, 25.4%-45.0%] for vitamin D3 vs 50.0% [95% CI, 39.9%-60.1%] for placebo; HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.93], P for interaction = .12). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among critically illpatients with vitamin D deficiency, administration of high-dose vitamin D3 compared with placebo did not reduce hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, or 6-month mortality. Lower hospital mortality was observed in the severe vitamin D deficiency subgroup, but this finding should be considered hypothesis generating and requires further study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01130181.
Authors: David E Leaf; Edward D Siew; Michele F Eisenga; Karandeep Singh; Finnian R Mc Causland; Anand Srivastava; T Alp Ikizler; Lorraine B Ware; Adit A Ginde; John A Kellum; Paul M Palevsky; Myles Wolf; Sushrut S Waikar Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Gennaro Martucci; Fabio Tuzzolino; Antonio Arcadipane; Thomas R Pieber; Christian Schnedl; Tadeja Urbanic Purkart; Gerlies Treiber; Karin Amrein Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jenny E Han; Jessica A Alvarez; Jennifer L Jones; Vin Tangpricha; Mona A Brown; Li Hao; Lou Ann S Brown; Greg S Martin; Thomas R Ziegler Journal: Nutrition Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Hallie C Prescott; Carolyn S Calfee; B Taylor Thompson; Derek C Angus; Vincent X Liu Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Julia Niederstrasser; Christian Herr; Lisa Wolf; Claus M Lehr; Christoph Beisswenger; Robert Bals Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 3.441