| Literature DB >> 29286462 |
Wusong Zou1, Yanqun Yang1, Ye Gu1, Pengfei Zhu1, Mingjing Zhang1, Zhong Cheng1, Xiaoyan Liu1, Yijun Yu1, Xiaohong Peng2.
Abstract
Blood can be collected from rats in a number of sampling locations. For instance, the tail vein is a superior location for blood sampling. However, the tail vein is thin so that it is sometimes hard to puncture. In addition, the tail vein has low blood flow and requires a long sampling time to get sufficient blood. The present report describes a simple blood sampling method, the vacuum blood collection method, which is usually used to obtain blood samples from patients, here used for non-anesthetized rats. The 22 G butterfly needle tip was inserted into one of the lateral tail veins approximately 2-3 cm from the tip of the tail at an angle of approximately 20°, and blood was collected in the vacuum collection tube by inserting the rubber end of the butterfly needle into the vacuum blood collection tube. The present experimental results show that the success rate was 95% in the experimental group and 90% in the beginner group. The success rate and puncture times were similar between two groups. The sampling duration was significantly shorter in the experimental group compared to beginner group. In conclusion, this vacuum blood collection method for sequential blood sampling from the tail vein of non- anesthetized rats is feasible and easy-to-learn, which might serve as a reliable alternative to other conventionally used blood sampling techniques for rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29286462 PMCID: PMC5755556 DOI: 10.3791/55852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vis Exp ISSN: 1940-087X Impact factor: 1.355



| Experimental group | Beginner group | |||||||||
| Gender | Body weight (g) | Collected blood volume (mL) | sampling duration (min) | Gender | Body weight (g) | Collected blood volume (mL) | sampling duration (min) | |||
| E1-1 | male | 291 | 1.2 | 3.12 | B1-1 | male | 282 | 1.2 | 3.18 | |
| E1-2 | male | 291 | 1.2 | 2.73 | B1-2 | male | 282 | 1.2 | 2.18 | |
| E2-1 | male | 276 | 1.2 | 2.3 | B2-1 | male | 264 | 1.2 | 3.73 | |
| E2-2 | male | 276 | 1.2 | 2.37 | B2-2 | male | 264 | 1.2 | 2.47 | |
| E3-1 | male | 267 | 1.2 | 2.73 | B3-1 | male | 265 | 1.2 | 3.52 | |
| E3-2 | male | 267 | 1.0 | 3.88 | B3-2 | male | 265 | 1.2 | 2.53 | |
| E4-1 | male | 263 | 1.2 | 2.41 | B4-1 | male | 289 | 1.2 | 2.32 | |
| E4-2 | male | 263 | 1.2 | 2.52 | B4-2 | male | 289 | 1.2 | 3.62 | |
| E5-1 | male | 265 | 1.2 | 3.61 | B5-1 | male | 277 | 1.2 | 3.48 | |
| E5-2 | male | 265 | 1.2 | 2.42 | B5-2 | male | 277 | 1.2 | 3.12 | |
| E6-1 | female | 285 | 1.2 | 3.33 | B6-1 | female | 274 | 0.9 | 4.87 | |
| E6-2 | female | 285 | 1.2 | 3.03 | B6-2 | female | 274 | 1.2 | 3.37 | |
| E7-1 | female | 271 | 1.2 | 2.82 | B7-1 | female | 268 | 1.0 | 3.93 | |
| E7-2 | female | 271 | 1.2 | 2.42 | B7-2 | female | 268 | 1.2 | 3.82 | |
| E8-1 | female | 268 | 1.2 | 1.93 | B8-1 | female | 262 | 1.2 | 2.07 | |
| E8-2 | female | 268 | 1.2 | 3.05 | B8-2 | female | 262 | 1.2 | 3.67 | |
| E9-1 | female | 273 | 1.2 | 2.52 | B9-1 | female | 281 | 1.2 | 4.38 | |
| E9-2 | female | 273 | 1.2 | 3.17 | B9-2 | female | 281 | 1.2 | 4.57 | |
| E10-1 | female | 261 | 1.2 | 1.82 | B10-1 | female | 275 | 1.2 | 2.53 | |
| E10-2 | female | 261 | 1.2 | 3.25 | B10-2 | female | 275 | 1.2 | 2.28 | |
| Average | 2.77 | 3.28 | ||||||||
| En-1: serial number of rats in the experimental group for the first blood collection. | ||||||||||
| En-2: serial number of rats in the experimental group for the second blood collection. | ||||||||||
| Bn-1: serial number of rats in the beginner group for the first blood collection. | ||||||||||
| Bn-2: serial number of rats in the beginner group for the second blood collection. |
| Blood collection times | Average puncture times | One time puncture | Two times puncture | Three times puncture | Failed | Success rate | |
| Experimental group | 20 | 1.50 ±0.61 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 95% |
| Beginner group | 20 | 1.85 ±0.75 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 90% |
| One time puncture: Number of rats with successful blood collection after the first puncture | |||||||
| Two times puncture:Number of rats with successful blood collection after the second puncture | |||||||
| Three times puncture:Number of rats with successful blood collection after the third puncture | |||||||
| Failed:Number of rats with failed blood collection after the third puncture |