Literature DB >> 29286400

Experimental Column Setup for Studying Anaerobic Biogeochemical Interactions Between Iron (Oxy)Hydroxides, Trace Elements, and Bacteria.

Jennifer Hellal1, André Burnol2, Aude Locatelli3, Fabienne Battaglia-Brunet4.   

Abstract

Fate and speciation of trace elements (TEs), such as arsenic (As) and mercury (Hg), in aquifers are closely related to physio-chemical conditions, such as redox potential (Eh) and pH, but also to microbial activities that can play a direct or indirect role on speciation and/or mobility. Indeed, some bacteria can directly oxidize As(III) to As(V) or reduce As(V) to As(III). Likewise, bacteria are strongly involved in Hg cycling, either through its methylation, forming the neurotoxin monomethyl mercury, or through its reduction to elemental Hg°. The fates of both As and Hg are also strongly linked to soil or aquifer composition; indeed, As and Hg can bind to organic compounds or (oxy)hydroxides, which will influence their mobility. In turn, bacterial activities such as iron (oxy)hydroxide reduction or organic matter mineralization can indirectly influence As and Hg sequestration. The presence of sulfate/sulfide can also strongly impact these particular elements through the formation of complexes such as thio-arsenates with As or metacinnabar with Hg. Consequently, many important questions have been raised on the fate and speciation of As and Hg in the environment and how to limit their toxicity. However, due to their reactivity towards aquifer components, it is difficult to clearly dissociate the biogeochemical processes that occur and their different impacts on the fate of these TE. To do so, we developed an original, experimental, column setup that mimics an aquifer with As- or Hg-iron-oxide rich areas versus iron depleted areas, enabling a better understanding of TE biogeochemistry in anoxic conditions. The following protocol gives step by step instructions for the column set-up either for As or Hg, as well as an example with As under iron and sulfate reducing conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29286400      PMCID: PMC5755597          DOI: 10.3791/56240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  15 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems.

Authors:  Tamar Barkay; Susan M Miller; Anne O Summers
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 16.408

2.  Mercury mobilization and speciation linked to bacterial iron oxide and sulfate reduction: A column study to mimic reactive transfer in an anoxic aquifer.

Authors:  Jennifer Hellal; Stéphane Guédron; Lucie Huguet; Jörg Schäfer; Valérie Laperche; Catherine Joulian; Laurent Lanceleur; André Burnol; Jean-Philippe Ghestem; Francis Garrido; Fabienne Battaglia-Brunet
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.188

3.  Mercury methylation from unexpected sources: molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and an iron-reducing bacterium.

Authors:  Emily J Fleming; E Erin Mack; Peter G Green; Douglas C Nelson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Genes and enzymes involved in bacterial oxidation and reduction of inorganic arsenic.

Authors:  Simon Silver; L T Phung
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment.

Authors:  G C Compeau; R Bartha
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Binding constants of divalent mercury (Hg2+) in soil humic acids and soil organic matter.

Authors:  Abdul R Khwaja; Paul R Bloom; Patrick L Brezonik
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Mercury speciation in highly contaminated soils from chlor-alkali plants using chemical extractions.

Authors:  Carmen-Mihaela Neculita; Gérald J Zagury; Louise Deschênes
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.751

8.  An arsenic(III)-oxidizing bacterial population: selection, characterization, and performance in reactors.

Authors:  F Battaglia-Brunet; M-C Dictor; F Garrido; C Crouzet; D Morin; K Dekeyser; M Clarens; P Baranger
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 9.  The ecology of arsenic.

Authors:  Ronald S Oremland; John F Stolz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Thioarsenates in geothermal waters of Yellowstone National Park: determination, preservation, and geochemical importance.

Authors:  Britta Planer-Friedrich; Jacqueline London; R Blaine McCleskey; D Kirk Nordstrom; Dirk Wallschläger
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.