Literature DB >> 15647556

Mercury speciation in highly contaminated soils from chlor-alkali plants using chemical extractions.

Carmen-Mihaela Neculita1, Gérald J Zagury, Louise Deschênes.   

Abstract

A four-step novel sequential extraction procedure (SEP) was developed to assess Hg fractionation and mobility in three highly contaminated soils from chlor-alkali plants (CAPs). The SEP was validated using a certified reference material (CRM) and pure Hg compounds. Total, volatile, and methyl Hg concentrations were also determined using single extractions. Mercury was separated into four fractions defined as water-soluble (F1), exchangeable (F2) (0.5 M NH4Ac-EDTA and 1 M CaCl2 were tested), organic (F3) (successive extractions with 0.2 M NaOH and CH3COOH 4% [v/v]), and residual (F4) (HNO3 + H2SO4 + HClO4). The soil characterization revealed extremely contaminated (295 +/- 18 to 11 500 +/- 500 mg Hg kg(-1)) coarse-grained sandy soils having an alkaline pH (7.9-9.1), high chloride concentrations (5-35 mg kg(-1)), and very low organic carbon content (0.00-18.2 g kg(-1)). Methyl Hg concentrations were low (0.2-19.3 microg kg(-1)) in all soils. Sequential extractions indicated that the majority of the Hg was associated with the residual fraction (F4). In Soils 1 and 3, however, high percentages (88-98%) of the total Hg were present as volatile Hg. Therefore, in these two soils, a high proportion of volatile Hg was present in the residual fraction. The nonresidual fraction (F1 + F2 + F3) was most abundant in Soil 1 (14-42%), suggesting a higher availability of Hg in this soil. The developed and validated SEP was reproducible and efficient for highly contaminated samples. Recovery ranged between 93 and 98% for the CRM and 70 and 130% for the CAP-contaminated soils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15647556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  8 in total

1.  Speciative distribution and bioavailability of metals in agricultural soils receiving industrial wastewater.

Authors:  Saadia Rashid Tariq; Amna Bashir
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Experimental Column Setup for Studying Anaerobic Biogeochemical Interactions Between Iron (Oxy)Hydroxides, Trace Elements, and Bacteria.

Authors:  Jennifer Hellal; André Burnol; Aude Locatelli; Fabienne Battaglia-Brunet
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Mercury toxicity to Eisenia fetida in three different soils.

Authors:  Khandaker Rayhan Mahbub; Kannan Krishnan; Ravi Naidu; Mallavarapu Megharaj
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Mechanism of Hg(II) Immobilization in Sediments by Sulfate-Cement Amendment.

Authors:  Susana Serrano; Dimitri Vlassopoulos; Peggy A O'Day
Journal:  Appl Geochem       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.524

5.  Determination, speciation and distribution of mercury in soil in the surroundings of a former chlor-alkali plant: assessment of sequential extraction procedure and analytical technique.

Authors:  Tiberiu Frentiu; Bogdan Petru Pintican; Sanziana Butaciu; Alin Ironim Mihaltan; Michaela Ponta; Maria Frentiu
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.215

6.  Proof of concept for a passive sampler for monitoring of gaseous elemental mercury in artisanal gold mining.

Authors:  Elias de Barros Santos; Paleah Moher; Stacy Ferlin; Anne Hélène Fostier; Italo Odone Mazali; Kevin Telmer; Alexandre Guimarães Brolo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Mercury (Hg) Contaminated Sites in Kazakhstan: Review of Current Cases and Site Remediation Responses.

Authors:  Mert Guney; Zhanel Akimzhanova; Aiganym Kumisbek; Kamila Beisova; Symbat Kismelyeva; Aliya Satayeva; Vassilis Inglezakis; Ferhat Karaca
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Mercury exposure, nutritional deficiencies and metabolic disruptions may affect learning in children.

Authors:  Renee Dufault; Roseanne Schnoll; Walter J Lukiw; Blaise Leblanc; Charles Cornett; Lyn Patrick; David Wallinga; Steven G Gilbert; Raquel Crider
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 3.759

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.