| Literature DB >> 29285356 |
Pingping Tao1, Weiping Zheng2, Xiaohua Meng2, Junxia Chen2, Aijing Sun3, Qinghe Shou2, Yungen Wang2, Binlie Yang1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of the traditional Chinese medicine paiteling on the outcome of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection of the cervix. A total of 321 patients were enrolled in this study and HPV subtypes were determined by the Hybribio HPV genotyping system. The patients were divided into the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP; n=82) and non-LEEP (n=239) groups, according to the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia classification. These two groups were further subdivided into the drug (paiteling) and control subgroups. Thin-prep cytology and HR-HPV tests were performed every 3 months for 1 year. In the non-LEEP group, the negative conversion rate of HR-HPV and the regression rate of the cervical lesions in drug subgroup were significantly higher compared with those in the control subgroup. In the LEEP group, the seroconversion rate of the drug subgroup, but not the regression rate of the lesions, was significantly higher compared with that in the control subgroup. The seroconversion rate of HPV16-infected patients at 12 months was 85.7%, whereas it reached 100% in all other HPV subtypes. Therefore, paiteling may accelerate the clearance of HPV infection and the regression of cervical lesions.Entities:
Keywords: clearance rate; human papillomavirus subtypes; outcome; paiteling; papillomavirus infections
Year: 2017 PMID: 29285356 PMCID: PMC5740912 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2017.1454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Clin Oncol ISSN: 2049-9450
Cytological and pathological results in the drug and control subgroups of the non-LEEP group.
| Subgroups | Subgroups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cytological results | Control | Drug | Pathological results | Control | Drug |
| ASC (n=92) | 51 | 41 | Chronic cervicitis (n=52) | 26 | 26 |
| HSIL (n=3) | 2 | 1 | Condyloma-like changes with chronic cervicitis (n=60) | 30 | 30 |
| LSIL (n=76) | 40 | 36 | Condyloma-like changes (n=52) | 26 | 26 |
| NILM (n=68) | 37 | 31 | CIN 1 with condylomalike changes (n=26) | 13 | 13 |
| Total (n=266) | 148 | 118 | CIN 1 and CIN 1–2 (n=14) | 7 | 7 |
| CIN 2 (n=14) | 7 | 7 | |||
| Total (n=218) | 109 | 109 | |||
LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; ASC, atypical squamous cells; HSIL, highgrade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL, lowgrade squamous intraepithelial lesion; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Figure 1.Cytological diagnosis in the drug and control subgroups of the non-LEEP group. The numbers represent the cases per category. LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; ASC, atypical squamous cells; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; NILM, negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy.
Comparison of seroconversion rates in the non-LEEP group.
| Paiteling group | Control group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up time, months | Total cases | Negative cases | Negative conversion (%) | Total cases | Negative cases | Negative conversion (%) | χ2 | P-value |
| 6 | 105 | 88 | 83.9 | 126 | 35 | 27.8 | 66.99 | <0.01 |
| 9 | 105 | 94 | 89.5 | 120 | 46 | 38.3 | 60.27 | <0.01 |
| 12 | 103 | 98 | 95.2 | 115 | 82 | 71.3 | 19.83 | <0.01 |
LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Comparison of regression rates in the non-LEEP group.
| Paiteling group | Control group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up time, months | Total cases | Regression number | Regression rate (%) | Total cases | Regression number | Regression rate (%) | χ2 | P-value |
| 6 | 105 | 89 | 84.8 | 126 | 38 | 30.2 | 66.80 | <0.01 |
| 9 | 105 | 90 | 85.7 | 120 | 56 | 46.7 | 35.78 | <0.01 |
| 12 | 103 | 94 | 91.3 | 115 | 64 | 55.7 | 31.05 | <0.01 |
LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Cytological results in the drug and control subgroups of the LEEP group.
| Subgroups | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cytological results | Control | Drug | Total |
| CIN 1 | 3 | 4 | 92 |
| CIN 2 | 17 | 16 | 3 |
| CIN 3 | 20 | 22 | 76 |
| Total | 148 | 118 | 266 |
LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Figure 2.Histopathological diagnosis in the drug and control subgroups of the non-LEEP group. The numbers represent the cases per category. LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Figure 3.Seroconversion rates of HPV subtypes at different time points following paiteling treatment. HPV, human papillomavirus.
Seroconversion rates of HPV subtypes at different time points following application of paiteling.
| Seroconversion cases, n (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPV subtype | Total cases | 6 months | 9 months | 12 months | Note |
| 16 | 38 | 25 (67.7) | 29 (78.4) | 30 (85.7) | One lost; two lost at 12 months |
| 52 | 20 | 17 (89.5) | 18 (94.7) | 19 (100.0) | One lost |
| 58 | 16 | 15 (93.8) | 15 (93.8) | 16 (100.0) | |
| 53 | 10 | 8 (80.0) | 10 (100.0) | 10 (100.0) | |
| 39 | 9 | 9 (100.0) | 9 (100.0) | 9 (100.0) | |
| 33 | 6 | 3 (75.0) | 3 (75.0) | 4 (100.0) | One lost; one with positive HPV merged with HPV59 |
| 56 | 5 | 5 (100.0) | 5 (100.0) | 5 (100.0) | |
| 66 | 5 | 5 (100.0) | 5 (100.0) | 5 (100.0) | |
| 68 | 5 | 5 (100.0) | 5 (100.0) | 5 (100.0) | Two merged with HPV16 and remained positive; one lost, while all others were negative |
| 31 | 2 | 2 (100.0) | 2 (100.0) | 2 (100.0) | |
| 51 | 2 | 1 (50.0) | 2 (100.0) | 2 (100.0) | One with positive HPV at 6 months merged with HPV52 |
| 59 | 2 | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | 2 (100.0) | |
| CP8304 | 2 | 2 (100.0) | 2 (100.0) | 2 (100.0) | |
| 45 | 1 | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | 1 (100.0) | |
The HPV subtypes were sorted according to the number of infected patients in this study, from large to small, and multiple infections were counted repeatedly. The seroconversion rate of HR-HPV was determined according to the results of HPV genotyping, regardless of the outcomes of cytological examination. HPV, human papillomavirus.
Comparison of seroconversion rates in the LEEP group.
| Paiteling group | Control group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up time, months | Total cases | Negative cases | Negative conversion (%) | Total cases | Negative cases | Negative conversion (%) | χ2 | P-value |
| 6 | 42 | 35 | 83.3 | 40 | 24 | 60.0 | 0.035 | <0.05 |
| 9 | 40 | 36 | 90.0 | 35 | 25 | 71.4 | 0.039 | <0.05 |
| 12 | 40 | 38 | 95.0 | 35 | 28 | 80.0 | 0.046 | <0.05 |
LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure.
Comparison of regression rates in the LEEP group.
| Paiteling group | Control group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow-up time, months | Total cases | Regression number | Regression rate (%) | Total cases | Regression number | Regression rate (%) | χ2 | P-value |
| 6 | 42 | 39 | 92.9 | 40 | 31 | 77.5 | 3.87 | <0.05 |
| 9 | 40 | 37 | 92.5 | 35 | 30 | 85.7 | 0.90 | >0.05 |
| 12 | 40 | 37 | 92.5 | 35 | 31 | 88.6 | 0.34 | >0.05 |
LEEP, loop electrosurgical excision procedure.