| Literature DB >> 33859483 |
Mei-Fang Wang1, Li Lin1, Lin-Feng Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Giant condyloma acuminatum (GCA), also called Buschke-Löwenstein tumor, presents as a verrucous infiltrating lesion and is caused by sexual transmission of human papilloma virus. The optimal treatment is controversial and there are no standard guidelines because of its rarity and frequent recurrence. It has a relatively high local recurrence rate.Entities:
Keywords: GCA; TCM; dermatosis symptoms; giant condyloma acuminatum; paiteling; traditional Chinese medicine; treatment
Year: 2021 PMID: 33859483 PMCID: PMC8043789 DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S302195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Drug Resist ISSN: 1178-6973 Impact factor: 4.003
Characteristics of Patients, Lesions, and Treatment
| Case | Sex | Age | Site | Course | Diameter | Associated Diseases | Previous Treatment | HPV Test | Treatment | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First | Second | Third | |||||||||
| 1 | F | 75 | Vulva | 16M | 15cmX10cm | Eczema of groin, hypertension | None | None | 18w | 4w | 3M |
| 2 | M | 27 | Monsveneris, crissum | 18M | 5cmX4cm | None | None | HPV6,11+ | 18w | 3w | 3M |
| 3 | M | 28 | Penis | 1M | 5cmX5cm | DM 1y | Uncertain laser | None | 4–5W | 3w | 3M |
| 4 | M | 67 | Penis | 18M | 4cmX4cm | Urinate impeded, hypertension | Drugs for external use | Positive,uncertain type | 10W | 4W | 3M |
| 5 | M | 26 | Crissum | 0.5M | 11cmX10cm | None | None | Positive,uncertain type | 4W | 6W | 3M |
| 6 | M | 28 | Penis | 1.5M | 5cmX4cm | DM1y | Uncertain laser | HPV6+ | 4–5W | 4W | 3M |
| 7 | M | 68 | Crissum, anal tube | 3M | 6cmX4cm | None | Uncertain laser | Positive,uncertain type | 2W | 5W | 3M |
| 1W | 6W | 3M | |||||||||
| 8 | F | 19 | Vulva, vagina | 2M | 4cmX3cm | None | None | None | 1W | 6W | 3M |
Figure 1Case 1. (A) Pretreatment photograph showing massive (15 cm × 10 cm) cauliflower-like lesions clustered in the vulva. During the first stage of treatment, the lesion’s size and severity gradually reduced until it had completely disappeared. Photographs taken at (B) 1 week, (C) 4 weeks, (D) 8 weeks, (E) 12 weeks, and (F) 18 weeks. (G) Photograph showing that the lesion is invisible to the naked eye but the VIA is positive 4 weeks into the second stage of treatment. (H) The lesion is invisible and the VIA negative after 3 months of the third stage of treatment.
Figure 2Case 5. (A) Photograph showing massive lesions (11 cm × 10 cm) clustered in the perianal region before treatment. The lesions became smaller after (B) 1 week, (C) 2 weeks, (D) 3 weeks, and (E) 4 weeks of first stage treatment. (F) The lesions disappeared after 10 weeks’ treatment with no scarring.