| Literature DB >> 29285268 |
Mathieu Meunier1,2, Sarah Ancelet2, Christine Lefebvre3, Josiane Arnaud4, Catherine Garrel4, Mylène Pezet5, Yan Wang2, Patrice Faure4, Gautier Szymanski3, Nicolas Duployez6, Claude Preudhomme6, Denis Biard7, Benoit Polack2,3, Jean-Yves Cahn1,2, Jean Marc Moulis8,9,10, Sophie Park1,2.
Abstract
Anemia is a frequent cytopenia in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and most patients require red blood cell transfusion resulting in iron overload (IO). Deferasirox (DFX) has become the standard treatment of IO in MDS and it displays positive effects on erythropoiesis. In low risk MDS samples, mechanisms improving erythropoiesis after DFX treatment remain unclear. Herein, we addressed this question by using liquid cultures with iron overload of erythroid precursors treated with low dose of DFX (3μM), which corresponds to DFX 5 mg/kg/day, an unusual dose used for iron chelation. We highlight a decreased apoptosis rate and an increased proportion of cycling cells, both leading to higher proliferation rates. The iron chelation properties of low dose DFX failed to activate the Iron Regulatory Proteins and to support iron depletion, but low dose DFX dampers intracellular reactive oxygen species. Furthermore low concentrations of DFX activate the NF-κB pathway in erythroid precursors triggering anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory signals. Establishing stable gene silencing of the Thioredoxin (TRX) 1 genes, a NF-κB modulator, showed that fine-tuning of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels regulates NF-κB. These results justify a clinical trial proposing low dose DFX in MDS patients refractory to erythropoiesis stimulating agents.Entities:
Keywords: deferasirox; erythropoiesis; iron chelation; myelodysplastic syndromes; oxidative stress
Year: 2017 PMID: 29285268 PMCID: PMC5739655 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.22299
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Samples characteristics
| Patient | Date of birth | Diagnosis | Karyotype | IPSS-R |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | 27/04/1926 | RCMD | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 2 | 18/08/1934 | RCMD | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 3 | 01/04/1941 | CMML | 45, X,-Y, del(13)(q12q21)[ | |
| Patient 4 | 19/08/1938 | RCMD | 46, XX (20) | |
| Patient 5 | 24/06/1957 | RCMD | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 6 | 02/05/1951 | RCMD | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 7 | 16/02/1947 | ICUS | 46, XX (20) | |
| Patient 8 | 10/10/1955 | RCMD | 46, XX (20) | |
| Patient 9 | 09/09/1932 | RCMD | 46, XX (20) | |
| Patient 10 | 14/04/1959 | RCMD | 46, XX (20) | |
| Patient 11 | 10/04/1953 | RCMD | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 12 | 25/01/1928 | RCMD | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 13 | 28/02/1941 | CMML | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 14 | 03/11/1947 | RCMD | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 15 | 09/07/1936 | RCMD | 46, XX (20) | |
| Patient 16 | 23/12/1968 | RN | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 17 | 22/10/1939 | RCMD | 46, XX (20) | |
| Patient 18 | 26/04/1933 | RCMD | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 19 | 07/06/1940 | RCMD | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 20 | 16/08/1924 | ICUS | 46, XX (20) | |
| Patient 21 | 15/09/1935 | RCMD | 46, XX (20) | |
| Patient 22 | 28/06/1925 | CMML | 46, XX (20) | |
| Patient 23 | 15/11/1951 | CMML | 46, XX (20) | |
| Patient 24 | 28/02/1941 | CMML | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 25 | 31/07/1945 | CMML | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 26 | 10/06/1973 | RN | 46, XY (20) | |
| Patient 27 | 13/02/1935 | CMML | 46, XY, del(16)(q12q23)[ |
Diagnosis: CMML: chronic myelo-monocytic leukemia; ICUS: idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance; RCMD: refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia; RN: refractory neutropenia.
Figure 1(A) Cell proliferation rates with or without 3 μM DFX (n=18). Proliferation rates were given as a proliferation ratio (PR) consisting in the number of cells counted at each day of analysis divided by the initial number of CD34+. CD34+ from myelodysplastic patients cells treated with DFX 3μM had a better proliferation rates (p=0.039) at the end of the cell culture period (day 14). (B) Proliferation rates after DFX (3μM) treatment in comparison with deferoxamine (DFO; 500μM) or deferiprone (DFP; 800μM) for 3 samples of CD34+ from myelodysplastic patients. (C) Results of apoptosis assay (% of annexin V positive cells) assessed by flow cytometry using annexin V staining. (D) Cell cycle was analyzed by flow cytometry with DAPI staining (n=7) and the two histograms correspond to cells in mitosis and S-phase (left) or in other phases of the cycle (right). (E) Clonogenic assays were started at D5 (n=9) of the erythroid differentiation model. BFU-E: Burst Forming Unit-Erythroid; CFU-E: Colony Forming-Unit-Erythroid.
Figure 2(A) Results of confocal immunofluorescence microscopy assays for NF-κB (n=7). Nuclei are stained in blue; the red signal represents the p65 subunit of NF-κB; x 63. Histogram representing the fold of change of NF-κB nuclear translocation. Data were analyzed by a specific software (ICY) to determine the nuclear fluorescence of NF-κB in the nucleus. Data were normalized to the CTRL condition in each case. (B) Results of the RT-qPCR microarray plates used to assess the impact of DFX on the expression of 84 known gene targets of NF-κB activation (n=5). Scatter plots represent the normalized expression of NF-κB targeted genes between DFX and CTRL conditions. The central line indicates unchanged gene expression. The dotted lines indicate the selected 2-fold regulation threshold. Data points beyond the dotted lines in the upper left area (yellow) are over expressed genes and those in the lower right sections (blue) are under expressed genes. Baculoviral IAP Repeat Containing 3 (BIRC3), caspase 8 (CASP8), Colony Stimulating Factor 3 (CSF3), and Interleukin 1 Receptor Associated Kinase 2 (IRAK2). Fas Ligand (FASLG), Interleukin 1 Receptor Type 1 (IL1R1), Toll Like Receptor 9 (TLR9), PC4 and SFRS1 Interacting Protein 1 (PSIP1), C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2 (CCL2), TNF Receptor Associated Factor 2 (TRAF2), Lymphotoxin Beta Receptor (LTBR), Toll Like Receptor Adaptor Molecule 2 (TICAM2), CD27, and Toll Like Receptor 4 (TLR4).
Figure 3(A) Decreased intracellular iron content after DFX treatment as measured by ICP-MS. K562 cells were treated with increased doses of DFX for 48 hours (n=4). (B) Representative (n=2) Iron Regulatory protein (IRP) activity in K562 cells treated with increasing concentrations of DFX. IRP activity was assessed by REMSA using an Iron Responsive Element (IRE) biotin-labeled probe. The apo-IRP form was activated after treatment with 2-mercaptoethanol (2ME). (C) Histogram representing the ratio of the measured IRP activity divided by the total of IRP activity revealed by the 2-mercaptoethanol treatment (n=2).
Figure 4(A) Flow cytometry analysis of intracellular ROS with DHE staining (n=8) and mitochondrial ROS with MitoSOX probe (n=9) at D14 of the cell culture procedure. The data are normalized to the CTRL condition in each case. (B) Levels of MDA, Carbonyls, Glutathione and SOD (SOD 1-3) activity normalized to the CTRL condition. (C) Western blot of GPX4 for MDS patient (three samples were pooled) and healthy donor (n=1). Fibroblasts were used as a positive control.CTRL: control; DMSO: Dimethylsulfoxyde; REMSA: RNA electrophoretic mobility shift assay; HD: healthy donor; IRP: Iron response protein; IRE: Iron Responsive Element; MDA: Malondialdehyde; ROS: reactive oxygen species; SOD: superoxide dismutase.
Figure 5(A) Western blot analysis of Trx1 and Trx2 protein levels in stable TRX1KD and TRX2KD K562 cells. Trx1 and Trx2: 13 kDa; actin: 42 kDa. (B) Flow cytometry analysisof intracellular ROS with DHE staining (n=4) in CTRL and stable TRXKD K562 cells without iron overload. (C) Same experiment as in B for mitochondrial ROS with MitoSOX probe (n=4). (D) Assessment of NF-κB activity with a luciferase reporter assay (n=4) in TRXKD K562 cells without iron overloaded condition. (E) Same experiment as in B with FAS (100μM) and DFX 3μM or NAC 1mM. (F) Same experiment as in C with FAS (100μM) and DFX 3μM or NAC 1mM. (G) Same experiment as in D with FAS (100μM) and DFX 3μM or NAC 1mM. (H) Quantification of NF-κB translocation by confocal microscopy for K562 cells as described in (G). (FAS: ammonium sulfate to the medium, DFX: deferasirox, NAC: N-acetylcysteine; RFI: ratio of fluorescence; KD: knock-down; TRX: thioredoxin; *: <0.05; **: <0.001; ***: <0.0001).
Figure 6(A) Evolution of the hemoglobin level for 6 anemic patients with low risk MDS and refractory to erythropoiesis stimulating agents treated by low dose of deferasirox (DFX) before and after the beginning of DFX; initial hemoglobin level = T0 DFX). (B) Evolution of the proportion of untransfused patients after DFX treatment for the 6 anemic patients with low risk MDS and refractory to erythropoiesis stimulating agents treated by low dose of DFX.D: day; Hb: hemoglobin level, M: month.