Literature DB >> 29280222

The eyes have it: Using eye tracking to inform information processing strategies in multi-attributes choices.

Mandy Ryan1, Nicolas Krucien1, Frouke Hermens2.   

Abstract

Although choice experiments (CEs) are widely applied in economics to study choice behaviour, understanding of how individuals process attribute information remains limited. We show how eye-tracking methods can provide insight into how decisions are made. Participants completed a CE, while their eye movements were recorded. Results show that although the information presented guided participants' decisions, there were also several processing biases at work. Evidence was found of (a) top-to-bottom, (b) left-to-right, and (c) first-to-last order biases. Experimental factors-whether attributes are defined as "best" or "worst," choice task complexity, and attribute ordering-also influence information processing. How individuals visually process attribute information was shown to be related to their choices. Implications for the design and analysis of CEs and future research are discussed.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  choice experiments; choices; eye tracking; information processing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29280222     DOI: 10.1002/hec.3626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  6 in total

1.  Individual market health plan affordability after cost-sharing reduction subsidy cuts.

Authors:  Coleman Drake; Jean M Abraham
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Opening the 'Black Box': An Overview of Methods to Investigate the Decision-Making Process in Choice-Based Surveys.

Authors:  Dan Rigby; Caroline Vass; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Using Eye-Tracking Technology with Older People in Memory Clinics to Investigate the Impact of Mild Cognitive Impairment on Choices for EQ-5D-5L Health States Preferences.

Authors:  Kaiying Wang; Chris Barr; Richard Norman; Stacey George; Craig Whitehead; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.561

4.  Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the UK: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Luis Enrique Loría-Rebolledo; Mandy Ryan; Verity Watson; Mesfin G Genie; Ruben Andreas Sakowsky; Daniel Powell; Shantini Paranjothy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Preferences for COVID-19 epidemic control measures among French adults: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Jonathan Sicsic; Serge Blondel; Sandra Chyderiotis; François Langot; Judith E Mueller
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-03-19

6.  An Exploratory Application of Eye-Tracking Methods in a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Dan Rigby; Kelly Tate; Andrew Stewart; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.583

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.