Literature DB >> 20178942

Is the future the right time?

Marc Ouellet1, Julio Santiago, Ziv Israeli, Shai Gabay.   

Abstract

Spanish and English speakers tend to conceptualize time as running from left to right along a mental line. Previous research suggests that this representational strategy arises from the participants' exposure to a left-to-right writing system. However, direct evidence supporting this assertion suffers from several limitations and relies only on the visual modality. This study subjected to a direct test the reading hypothesis using an auditory task. Participants from two groups (Spanish and Hebrew) differing in the directionality of their orthographic system had to discriminate temporal reference (past or future) of verbs and adverbs (referring to either past or future) auditorily presented to either the left or right ear by pressing a left or a right key. Spanish participants were faster responding to past words with the left hand and to future words with the right hand, whereas Hebrew participants showed the opposite pattern. Our results demonstrate that the left-right mapping of time is not restricted to the visual modality and that the direction of reading accounts for the preferred directionality of the mental time line. These results are discussed in the context of a possible mechanism underlying the effects of reading direction on highly abstract conceptual representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20178942     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  38 in total

1.  With the past behind and the future ahead: back-to-front representation of past and future sentences.

Authors:  Rolf Ulrich; Verena Eikmeier; Irmgard de la Vega; Susana Ruiz Fernández; Simone Alex-Ruf; Claudia Maienborn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

2.  Metaphorically feeling: comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Randall Stilla; K Sathian
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Asymmetric bias in user guided segmentations of brain structures.

Authors:  Eric Maltbie; Kshamta Bhatt; Beatriz Paniagua; Rachel G Smith; Michael M Graves; Matthew W Mosconi; Sarah Peterson; Scott White; Joseph Blocher; Mohammed El-Sayed; Heather C Hazlett; Martin A Styner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  How do Mandarin speakers conceptualize time? Beyond the horizontal and vertical dimensions.

Authors:  Juan Sun; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2020-07-24

5.  Linguistic asymmetry, egocentric anchoring, and sensory modality as factors for the observed association between time and space perception.

Authors:  Eunice E Hang Choy; Him Cheung
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-05-17

Review 6.  Language as a disruptive technology: abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind.

Authors:  Guy Dove
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time.

Authors:  Robert Ariel; Ibrahim S Al-Harthy; Christopher A Was; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

8.  Spatial biases in understanding descriptions of static scenes: the role of reading and writing direction.

Authors:  Antonio Román; Abderrahman El Fathi; Julio Santiago
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-05

9.  Observation of directional storybook reading influences young children's counting direction.

Authors:  Silke M Göbel; Koleen McCrink; Martin H Fischer; Samuel Shaki
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-08-31

10.  Time does not flow without language: spatial distance affects temporal duration regardless of movement or direction.

Authors:  Zhenguang G Cai; Louise Connell; Judith Holler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.