| Literature DB >> 29279604 |
Xiao-Long Jiang1,2, Miao An1,2, Si-Si Zheng1,2, Min Deng3,4, Zhi-Hao Su5.
Abstract
Southwest China is one of the major global biodiversity hotspots. The Tanaka line, extending within southwestern China from its northwest to its southeast, is an important biogeographical boundary between the Sino-Japanese and Sino-Himalayan floristic regions. Understanding the evolutionary history of the regional keystone species would assist with both reconstructing historical vegetation dynamics and ongoing biodiversity management. In this research, we combined phylogeographic methodologies and species distribution models (SDMs) to investigate the spatial genetic patterns and distribution dynamics of Quercus kerrii, a dominant evergreen oak inhabiting southwest China lowland evergreen-broadleaved forests (EBLFs). A total of 403 individuals were sampled from 44 populations throughout southwest China. SDMs and mismatch distribution analysis indicated that Q. kerrii has undergone northward expansion since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Quantitative analysis revealed that the range expansion of Q. kerrii since the LGM exceeded that of the sympatric mid-elevation species Quercus schottkyana, likely owing to their contrasting distribution elevations and habitat availabilities. The historical climate change since the LGM and the latitude gradient of the region played an important role in shaping the genetic diversity of Q. kerrii. The genetic differentiation index and genetic distance surface of Q. kerrii populations east of the Tanaka line exceeded those to its west. The long-term geographic isolation and environmental heterogeneity between the two sides of the Tanaka line might increase species divergence patterns and local adaptation. This study provides new insights into the historical dynamics of subtropical EBLFs and the changing biota of southwest China.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29279604 PMCID: PMC5836588 DOI: 10.1038/s41437-017-0012-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heredity (Edinb) ISSN: 0018-067X Impact factor: 3.821
Sampling information and genetic diversity of Quercus kerrii populations
|
| SSR | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | Location | Long/lat |
| Haplotypes |
|
|
|
| He |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
| 1 | Longling, YN | 99.01/24.31 | 10 | H1(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.88 | 0.61 | 0.76 | 0.24 |
| 2 | Zhenkang, YN | 98.89/23.87 | 8 | H2(8) | 0 | 0 | 8 | 2.80 | 0.61 | 0.77 | 0.23 |
| 3 | Cangyuan, YN | 98.94/23.44 | 3 | H2(3) | 0 | 0 | 3 | — | — | 0.87 | 0.13 |
| 4 | Gengma, YN | 99.28/23.66 | 10 | H3(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.69 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.42 |
| 5 | Yongde, YN | 99.48/23.85 | 9 | H3(9) | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2.73 | 0.58 | 0.85 | 0.15 |
| 6 | Lincang, YN | 99.81/24.11 | 10 | H3(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.74 | 0.59 | 0.87 | 0.13 |
| 7 | Lincang, YN | 100.07/24.10 | 10 | H3(10) | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2.58 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.31 |
| 8 | Cangyuan, YN | 99.34/23.36 | 10 | H3(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.89 | 0.62 | 0.81 | 0.19 |
| 9 | Lincang, YN | 100.26/23.82 | 10 | H2(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.76 | 0.58 | 0.71 | 0.29 |
| 10 | Lincang, YN | 100.32/23.66 | 10 | H2(5),H3(5) | 0.56 | 0.53 | 10 | 2.90 | 0.62 | 0.85 | 0.15 |
| 11 | Lincang, YN | 100.16/23.53 | 10 | H2(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.79 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.25 |
| 12 | Shuangjiang, YN | 100.03/23.34 | 10 | H2(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.79 | 0.60 | 0.78 | 0.22 |
| 13 | Ximeng, YN | 99.61/22.81 | 9 | H3(9) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.57 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.48 |
| 14 | Lancang, YN | 100.14/22.94 | 10 | H2(9),H4(1) | 0.20 | 0.57 | 10 | 2.87 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 0.23 |
| 15 | Pu'er, YN | 100.53/23.00 | 10 | H2(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.69 | 0.56 | 0.86 | 0.14 |
| 16 | Ximeng, YN | 99.59/22.35 | 10 | H1(9),H5(1) | 0.20 | 0.19 | 10 | 2.88 | 0.62 | 0.72 | 0.28 |
| 17 | Lancang, YN | 100.18/22.66 | 10 | H1(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.80 | 0.61 | 0.87 | 0.13 |
| 18 | Lancang, YN | 100.23/22.60 | 10 | H1(8),H2(1),H4(1) | 0.38 | 0.90 | 10 | 2.76 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 0.25 |
| 19 | Simao, YN | 100.79/22.68 | 10 | H2(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.77 | 0.58 | 0.86 | 0.14 |
| 20 | Lincang, YN | 100.32/23.62 | 9 | H2(1),H3(8) | 0.22 | 0.21 | 20 | 2.73 | 0.57 | 0.77 | 0.23 |
|
| |||||||||||
| 21 | Jingdong, YN | 100.83/24.54 | 10 | H2(10) | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2.89 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.37 |
| 22 | Pu'er, YN | 100.90/24.45 | 5 | H2(5) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2.82 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.31 |
| 23 | Pu'er, YN | 101.25/24.71 | 10 | H6(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.76 | 0.56 | 0.68 | 0.32 |
| 24 | Jingdong, YN | 101.16/24.23 | 9 | H1(9) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.76 | 0.59 | 0.84 | 0.16 |
| 25 | Zhenhuan, YN | 101.21/24.06 | 10 | H1(6),H4(4) | 0.53 | 2.02 | 10 | 2.81 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.28 |
| 26 | Xinping, YN | 101.85/24.03 | 10 | H2(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.79 | 0.59 | 0.28 | 0.72 |
| 27 | Eshan, YN | 102.15/24.18 | 9 | H2(9) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.96 | 0.63 | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| 28 | Jiangcheng, YN | 102.02/23.02 | 10 | H2(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.65 | 0.54 | 0.86 | 0.14 |
| 29 | Jiangcheng, YN | 101.87/22.65 | 10 | H4(1),H7(9) | 0.20 | 1.32 | 10 | 2.73 | 0.59 | 0.78 | 0.22 |
| 30 | Yuanjiang, YN | 102.85/23.03 | 2 | H4(2) | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | — | 0.95 | 0.05 |
|
| |||||||||||
| 31 | Xilin, GX | 104.79/24.48 | 9 | H8(9) | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2.92 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.39 |
| 32 | Longlin, GX | 104.88/24.67 | 7 | H9(7) | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2.85 | 0.62 | 0.33 | 0.67 |
| 33 | Xilin, GX | 105.04/24.49 | 7 | H10(7) | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2.69 | 0.56 | 0.45 | 0.55 |
| 34 | Longlin, GX | 105.65/24.73 | 8 | H8(8) | 0 | 0 | 13 | 3.2 | 0.68 | 0.39 | 0.61 |
| 35 | Heng, GZ | 105.92/25.02 | 5 | H2(5) | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3.03 | 0.64 | 0.32 | 0.68 |
| 36 | Tianlin, GX | 105.81/24.65 | 2 | H11(2) | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | — | 0.12 | 0.88 |
| 37 | Luotuo, GZ | 106.64/25.28 | 6 | H2(6) | 0 | 0 | 12 | 3.17 | 0.67 | 0.38 | 0.62 |
| 38 | Tianlin, GX | 106.22/24.31 | 7 | H2(7) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3.14 | 0.69 | 0.22 | 0.78 |
| 39 | Tianlin, GX | 106.37/24.16 | 6 | H12(6) | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3.06 | 0.64 | 0.27 | 0.73 |
| 40 | Funing, YN | 105.84/23.72 | 10 | H2(9),H6(1) | 0.20 | 0.19 | 9 | 2.99 | 0.64 | 0.57 | 0.43 |
| 41 | Chihe, GX | 107.34/24.83 | 8 | H2(8) | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2.94 | 0.63 | 0.03 | 0.97 |
|
| |||||||||||
| 42 | Nanchahe, HN | 109.20/19.14 | 2 | H2(2) | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | Sanya, HN | 109.09/18.47 | 10 | H2(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.52 | 0.50 | 0.06 | 0.94 |
| 44 | Jianfengling, HN | 108.88/18.72 | 10 | H2(10) | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2.27 | 0.46 | 0.03 | 0.97 |
YN Yunnan Province, GX Guangxi Province, GZ Guizhou Province, HN Hainan Province, N number of sampled individuals, h haplotype diversity, π nucleotide diversity, A r standardized allelic richness, He expected heterozygosity, C A probability of population belong to group A, C B, probability of population belong to group B
Fig. 1a The distribution area of this studies. b Geographic distribution and c network of 12 cpDNA haplotypes of Quercus kerrii. b The pie charts reflect the occurrence frequency of each haplotype in each population. Haplotype colours correspond to those shown in the lower-left panel. The two dotted lines represent the Tanaka line and species genetic barriers, respectively. c The circle sizes are in proportion to the number of individuals of each haplotype. Haplotypes are coloured yellow, red, green and violet to represent the populations belonging to groups LCJ, HH, NPJ and HN, respectively
Fig. 4Potential species distributions in the a Last Glacial Maximum and b present periods. The colours of the rectangles in the lower left refers to different ranges of habitat suitability. Dots represent the points of sampled populations in our study, and dot colours represent the different ranges of PCA1 scores estimated from 19 environmental variables
Fig. 5Potential species distribution areas of Q. kerrii on the west side of the Tanaka line (represented in yellow) and east of the Tanaka line (represented in green). The maximum training sensitivity plus specificity threshold was used to determine the species presence threshold. The sizes of red dots represent the extent of climate change since the Last Glacial Maximum
The P-values of t test among groups. Below diagonal were genetic structure (in turn, Gp1 and CA) and above were environment factors (in turn, present and LGM period environment and environmental change since LGM)
| LCJ | HH | NPJ | HN | LCJ–HH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCJ | — | 0.60/0.26/0.35 | 0.00/0.00/0.00 | 0.12/0.07/0.87 | — |
| HH | 0.60/0.23 | — | 0.01/0.02/0.00 | 0.16/0.03/0.62 | — |
| NPJ | 0.00/0.00 | 0.00/0.00 | — | 0.50/0.01/0.00 | 0.00/0.00/0.00 |
| HN | 0.00/0.00 | 0.00/0.00 | 0.00/0.00 | — | — |
| LCJ–HH | — | — | 0.00/0.00 | — | — |
Measures of genetic diversity of the Quercus kerrii at group level based on cpDNA and nSSR data
| Population ID | cpDNA | SSR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| LCJ | 0.67(0.04) | 0.08(0.04) | 0.89(0.05) | 0.86(0.06) | 0.52 | 0.61 | 5.43 | 0.36 |
| HH | 0.69(0.14) | 0.06(0.06) | 0.92(0.08) | 0.83(0.16) | 0.54 | 0.61 | 5.55 | 0.38 |
| NPJ | 0.81(0.10) | 0.02(0.02) | 0.98(0.02) | 0.98(0.02) | 0.59 | 0.67 | 6.55 | 1.05 |
| HN | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0.46 | 0.51 | 4.65 | 0.68 |
| All | 0.71(0.06) | 0.05(0.02) | 0.93(0.03) | 0.92(0.04) | — | — | — | — |
Pairwise F ST-values between the groups of Quercus kerrii. Below diagonal were F ST-values and above were p-values
| LCJ | HH | NPJ | HN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCJ | — | 0.018 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| HH | 0.004 | — | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| NPJ | 0.030 | 0.026 | — | 0.000 |
| HN | 0.185 | 0.176 | 0.116 | — |
Fig. 2Plots of the first three and two coordinates of the principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) at population level a and group level b based on the nSSR pairwise differentiation matrix for Quercus kerrii
Values from best model for regression analysis between the genetic diversity of Quercus kerrii nSSR with environment and geography factors based on the backward eliminating procedure
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | SEa | t |
| Est | SEa | t |
| |
| (Intercept) | 0.50 | 0.47 | 1.06 | 0.29 | −0.26 | 0.17 | −1.48 | 0.15 |
|
| −0.09 | 0.05 | −2.01 |
| — | — | — | — |
|
| 0.33 | 0.19 | 1.76 |
| 0.23 | 0.09 | 2.60 |
|
|
| 0.42 | 0.11 | 3.99 |
| 0.20 | 0.06 | 3.35 |
|
| Longitude | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Latitude | 0.09 | 0.02 | 5.08 |
| 0.03 | 0.01 | 5.17 |
|
Est estimate, — eliminating variables. Significant p-values are in bold (p < 0.01), and marginally significant values (0.01 < p < 0.10) are italicized
aStandard error
Fig. 3Genetic landscape shape analysis for Quercus kerrii populations based on a cpDNA variation and on b nSSR variation at ten microsatellite loci. The x and y axes show the geographical locations within a Delaunay triangulation network constructed among the sampled populations. Surface heights reflect genetic distances among populations