Li-Na Cui1,1, Na Li2,1, Shuang Fu2, Xin Zhang2, Xin Wang2, Rui-Tao Wang2,3. 1. Department of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang, China. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang, China. 3. The Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Chinese Ministry of Education, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with severe morbidity and mortality in cancer. Mean platelet volume (MPV) is an indicator of activated platelets. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether the combination of D-dimer and MPV could have a better performance in predicting deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients with breast cancer. MEHTODS: In 342 consecutive breast cancer patients without preoperative DVT, we measured the preoperative D-dimer and MPV levels. Compression ultrasonography was performed in all breast cancer patients before surgery, as well as one month, three months, six months, and twelve months. RESULTS: During a median period of twelve months, 15 of the 234 patients (6.4%) developed DVT. MPV was reduced and D-dimer was increased in patients with DVT events compared to those without DVT. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that both MPV and D-dimer were independent predictors for DVT events. The area under the ROC curve was 0.619 (95% CI: 0.553 to 0.681) when D-dimer was used alone, whereas it increased to 0.790 (95% CI 0.732 to 0.840, p< 0.001) with the addition of MPV. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of preoperative D-Dimer and MPV improves the predictive power of postoperative DVT risk in breast cancer patients.
BACKGROUND: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with severe morbidity and mortality in cancer. Mean platelet volume (MPV) is an indicator of activated platelets. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether the combination of D-dimer and MPV could have a better performance in predicting deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients with breast cancer. MEHTODS: In 342 consecutive breast cancer patients without preoperative DVT, we measured the preoperative D-dimer and MPV levels. Compression ultrasonography was performed in all breast cancer patients before surgery, as well as one month, three months, six months, and twelve months. RESULTS: During a median period of twelve months, 15 of the 234 patients (6.4%) developed DVT. MPV was reduced and D-dimer was increased in patients with DVT events compared to those without DVT. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that both MPV and D-dimer were independent predictors for DVT events. The area under the ROC curve was 0.619 (95% CI: 0.553 to 0.681) when D-dimer was used alone, whereas it increased to 0.790 (95% CI 0.732 to 0.840, p< 0.001) with the addition of MPV. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of preoperative D-Dimer and MPV improves the predictive power of postoperative DVT risk in breast cancer patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; D-dimer; mean platelet volume; risk prediction