Claire Pearson1, Deborah S Kim2, Valerie H Mika3, S Imran Ayaz3, Scott R Millis4, Robert Dunne5, Phillip D Levy6. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, 4201 St. Antoine St., Detroit, MI 48201, United States. Electronic address: cpearson@med.wayne.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente South Sacramento Medical Center, 6600 Bruceville Rd., Sacramento, CA 95823, United States. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, 4201 St. Antoine St., Detroit, MI 48201, United States. 4. Division of Biostatistics, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Wayne State University, 261 Mack Blvd., Detroit, MI 48201, United States. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, 4201 St. Antoine St., Detroit, MI 48201, United States; St. John Hospital and Medical Center, 22101 Moross Rd., Detroit, MI 48236, United States. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, 4201 St. Antoine St., Detroit, MI 48201, United States; Department of Emergency Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Institute, Integrated Biosciences Center, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 6135 Woodward Ave., Detroit, MI 48202, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify health beliefs of emergency department (ED) patients with low acuity conditions and how these affect ambulance (AMB) utilization. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study on a convenience sample of patients 18years or older, who presented to the ED of an urban, academic hospital with an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage level of 4 or 5. Demographics, treatment, and disposition data were obtained along with self-administered surveys. Characteristics of patients with low acuity conditions who presented to the ED by AMB were compared to the patients who came to the ED by private transportation (PT). Data were analyzed with the chi-square test, t-test, and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients (97 AMB and 100 PT) were enrolled. Compared to PT, AMB patients were more likely to: be insured (82% vs. 56%; p=0.000), have a primary care provider (62% vs. 44%; p=0.048), and lack a regular means of transportation (53% vs. 33%; p=0.005). Three surveys were used the SF-8, Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults [STOFHLA], and Health Belief Model [HBM]. Answers to HBM showed patients perceive that their illness required care within one hour of arrival (38% vs. 21%; p=0.04), have used an ambulance in the past year (76% vs. 33%; p=0.001) and to utilize an ambulance in the future for similar concerns (53% vs. 15%; p=0.000). AMB patients were more likely to call an ambulance for any health concern (p=0.035) and felt that there were enough ambulances for all patients in the city (p=0.01). There were no differences in age, employment, level of income and education, nor hospital admission rate between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulance use in low-acuity ED patients is associated with misperceptions regarding severity of illness and resource allocation as well as limited access to private transportation. Understanding patient perceptions of illness and other barriers to receiving care is imperative for the development of interventions aimed at enabling change in health behaviors such as the elective use of limited resources.
OBJECTIVES: To identify health beliefs of emergency department (ED) patients with low acuity conditions and how these affect ambulance (AMB) utilization. METHODS: We performed a prospective, observational study on a convenience sample of patients 18years or older, who presented to the ED of an urban, academic hospital with an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage level of 4 or 5. Demographics, treatment, and disposition data were obtained along with self-administered surveys. Characteristics of patients with low acuity conditions who presented to the ED by AMB were compared to the patients who came to the ED by private transportation (PT). Data were analyzed with the chi-square test, t-test, and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients (97 AMB and 100 PT) were enrolled. Compared to PT, AMB patients were more likely to: be insured (82% vs. 56%; p=0.000), have a primary care provider (62% vs. 44%; p=0.048), and lack a regular means of transportation (53% vs. 33%; p=0.005). Three surveys were used the SF-8, Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults [STOFHLA], and Health Belief Model [HBM]. Answers to HBM showed patients perceive that their illness required care within one hour of arrival (38% vs. 21%; p=0.04), have used an ambulance in the past year (76% vs. 33%; p=0.001) and to utilize an ambulance in the future for similar concerns (53% vs. 15%; p=0.000). AMB patients were more likely to call an ambulance for any health concern (p=0.035) and felt that there were enough ambulances for all patients in the city (p=0.01). There were no differences in age, employment, level of income and education, nor hospital admission rate between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ambulance use in low-acuity ED patients is associated with misperceptions regarding severity of illness and resource allocation as well as limited access to private transportation. Understanding patient perceptions of illness and other barriers to receiving care is imperative for the development of interventions aimed at enabling change in health behaviors such as the elective use of limited resources.
Authors: Anita A Vashi; Tracy Urech; Siqi Wu; Derek Boothroyd; Paril Mehta; Aaron L Dalton; Elizabeth Brill; Chad Kessler; Steven M Asch Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Niamh M Cummins; Louise A Barry; Carrie Garavan; Collette Devlin; Gillian Corey; Fergal Cummins; Damien Ryan; Sinead Cronin; Emma Wallace; Gerard McCarthy; Rose Galvin Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-04-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Stefanie Völk; Uwe Koedel; Sophia Horster; Andreas Bayer; Jan G D'Haese; Hans-Walter Pfister; Matthias Klein Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Jelena Oulasvirta; Jussi Pirneskoski; Heini Harve-Rytsälä; Mitja Lääperi; Mikael Kuitunen; Markku Kuisma; Heli Salmi Journal: BMJ Paediatr Open Date: 2020-11-02
Authors: Tyler G James; Julia R Varnes; Meagan K Sullivan; JeeWon Cheong; Thomas A Pearson; Ali M Yurasek; M David Miller; Michael M McKee Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 3.390