Jelena Oulasvirta1,2, Heini Harve-Rytsälä3, Mitja Lääperi3, Markku Kuisma3, Heli Salmi4. 1. Division of Anesthesiology; Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS, P.O. Box 340, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland. jelena.oulasvirta@helsinki.fi. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS, P.O.Box 340, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland. jelena.oulasvirta@helsinki.fi. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS, P.O.Box 340, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland. 4. New Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS, P.O. Box 347, FI-00029, Helsinki, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The challenges encountered in emergency medical services (EMS) contacts with children are likely most pronounced in infants, but little is known about their out-of-hospital care. Our primary aim was to describe the characteristics of EMS contacts with infants. The secondary aims were to examine the symptom-based dispatch system for nonverbal infants, and to observe the association of unfavorable patient outcomes with patient and EMS mission characteristics. METHODS: In a population-based 5-year retrospective cohort of all 1712 EMS responses for infants (age < 1 year) in Helsinki, Finland (population 643,000, < 1-year old population 6548), we studied 1) the characteristics of EMS missions with infants; 2) mortality within 12 months; 3) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions; 4) medical state of the infant upon presentation to the emergency department (ED); 5) any medication or respiratory support given at the ED; 6) hospitalization; and 7) surgical procedures during the same hospital visit. RESULTS: 1712 infants with a median age of 6.7 months were encountered, comprising 0.4% of all EMS missions. The most common complaints were dyspnea, low-energy falls, and choking. Two infants died on-scene. The EMS transported 683 (39.9%) infants. One (0.1%) infant died during the 12-month follow-up period. Ninety-one infants had abnormal clinical examination upon arrival at the ED. PICU admissions (n = 28) were associated with young age (P < 0.01), a history of prematurity or problems in the neonatal period (P = 0.01), and previous EMS contacts within 72 h (P = 0.04). The adult-derived dispatch codes did not associate with the final diagnoses of the infants. CONCLUSIONS: Infants form a small but distinct group in pediatric EMS care, with specific characteristics differing from the overall pediatric population. Many EMS contacts with infants were nonurgent or medically unjustified, possibly reflecting an unmet need for other family services. The use of adult-derived symptom codes for dispatching is not optimal for infants. Unfavorable patient outcomes were rare. Risk factors for such outcomes include quickly renewed contacts, young age and health problems in the neonatal period.
BACKGROUND: The challenges encountered in emergency medical services (EMS) contacts with children are likely most pronounced in infants, but little is known about their out-of-hospital care. Our primary aim was to describe the characteristics of EMS contacts with infants. The secondary aims were to examine the symptom-based dispatch system for nonverbal infants, and to observe the association of unfavorable patient outcomes with patient and EMS mission characteristics. METHODS: In a population-based 5-year retrospective cohort of all 1712 EMS responses for infants (age < 1 year) in Helsinki, Finland (population 643,000, < 1-year old population 6548), we studied 1) the characteristics of EMS missions with infants; 2) mortality within 12 months; 3) pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions; 4) medical state of the infant upon presentation to the emergency department (ED); 5) any medication or respiratory support given at the ED; 6) hospitalization; and 7) surgical procedures during the same hospital visit. RESULTS: 1712 infants with a median age of 6.7 months were encountered, comprising 0.4% of all EMS missions. The most common complaints were dyspnea, low-energy falls, and choking. Two infants died on-scene. The EMS transported 683 (39.9%) infants. One (0.1%) infant died during the 12-month follow-up period. Ninety-one infants had abnormal clinical examination upon arrival at the ED. PICU admissions (n = 28) were associated with young age (P < 0.01), a history of prematurity or problems in the neonatal period (P = 0.01), and previous EMS contacts within 72 h (P = 0.04). The adult-derived dispatch codes did not associate with the final diagnoses of the infants. CONCLUSIONS:Infants form a small but distinct group in pediatric EMS care, with specific characteristics differing from the overall pediatric population. Many EMS contacts with infants were nonurgent or medically unjustified, possibly reflecting an unmet need for other family services. The use of adult-derived symptom codes for dispatching is not optimal for infants. Unfavorable patient outcomes were rare. Risk factors for such outcomes include quickly renewed contacts, young age and health problems in the neonatal period.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ambulance; Emergency department; Emergency medical services; Infant; Pediatric emergency care; Prehospital emergency care
Authors: Michael J Stoner; Prashant Mahajan; Silvia Bressan; Samuel H F Lam; Corrie E Chumpitazi; Aaron E Kornblith; Seth W Linakis; Damian Roland; Stephen B Freedman; Lise E Nigrovic; Kurt Denninghoff; Paul Ishimine; Nathan Kuppermann Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Se Uk Lee; Dongbum Suh; Hahn Bom Kim; Jin Hee Jung; Ki Jeong Hong; Jin Hee Lee; Hye Young Jang; Hyun Noh; Jae Yun Jung; Do Kyun Kim; Young Ho Kwak Journal: Clin Exp Emerg Med Date: 2017-06-30
Authors: Jeanne-Marie Guise; Matthew Hansen; Kerth O'Brien; Caitlin Dickinson; Garth Meckler; Phil Engle; William Lambert; Jonathan Jui Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 2.692