Literature DB >> 29276572

Genome sequence of the model plant pathogen Pectobacterium carotovorum SCC1.

Outi Niemi1,2, Pia Laine3, Patrik Koskinen1,3, Miia Pasanen4, Ville Pennanen1,2, Heidi Harjunpää1,2, Johanna Nykyri4, Liisa Holm1,3, Lars Paulin3, Petri Auvinen3, E Tapio Palva1,2, Minna Pirhonen4.   

Abstract

Bacteria of the genus Pectobacterium are economically important plant pathogens that cause soft rot disease on a wide variety of plant species. Here, we report the genome sequence of Pectobacterium carotovorum strain SCC1, a Finnish soft rot model strain isolated from a diseased potato tuber in the early 1980's. The genome of strain SCC1 consists of one circular chromosome of 4,974,798 bp and one circular plasmid of 5524 bp. In total 4451 genes were predicted, of which 4349 are protein coding and 102 are RNA genes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finland; Necrotroph; Pectobacterium; Plant pathogen; Potato; Soft rot

Year:  2017        PMID: 29276572      PMCID: PMC5738896          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-017-0301-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

10.1601/nm.3241 species are economically important plant pathogens that cause soft rot and blackleg disease on a range of plant species across the world [1, 2]. The main virulence mechanism employed by 10.1601/nm.3241 is the secretion of vast amounts of plant cell wall-degrading enzymes [1, 3]. Due to their ability to effectively macerate plant tissue for acquisition of nutrients, 10.1601/nm.3241 species are considered classical examples of necrotrophic plant pathogens. Among the 10.1601/nm.3241 species, 10.1601/nm.10935 has the widest host range while potato is the most important crop affected in temperate regions [1, 4]. 10.1601/nm.10935 strain SCC1 was isolated from a diseased potato tuber in Finland in the early 1980’s [5]. It is highly virulent on model plant hosts such as tobacco () and thale cress () as well as on the original host, potato (). For three decades, the strain has been used as a model strain in the study of virulence mechanisms of 10.1601/nm.3241 as well as in the study of plant defense mechanisms against necrotrophic plant pathogens ([e.g. [6-13]). Here we describe the annotated genome sequence of 10.1601/nm.10935 strain SCC1.

Organism information

Classification and features

10.1601/nm.10935 strain SCC1 is a Gram-negative, motile, non-sporulating, and facultatively anaerobic bacterium that belongs to the order of 10.1601/nm.29303 within the class of 10.1601/nm.2068. Cells of strain SCC1 are rod shaped with length of approximately 2 μm in the exponential growth phase (Fig. 1). Strain SCC1 is pathogenic causing soft rot disease in plants. It was originally isolated from a diseased potato tuber in Finland in 1982 [5]. It also provokes maceration symptoms on model plants Arabidopsis, tobacco, and tomato (), and is used as a soft rot model in research.
Fig. 1

Photomicrograph of Gram stained exponentially growing Pectobacterium carotovorum SCC1 cells. A light microscope with 100× magnification was used

Photomicrograph of Gram stained exponentially growing Pectobacterium carotovorum SCC1 cells. A light microscope with 100× magnification was used Strain SCC1 has previously been described belonging to 10.1601/nm.3242 based on biochemical properties such as its ability to grow at +37 °C and in 5% NaCl, its sensitivity to erythromycin, its ability to assimilate lactose, melibiose and raffinose but not sorbitol, and its inability to produce reducing sugars from sucrose and acid from α-methyl glucoside [14]. A phylogenetic tree generated based on seven housekeeping genes (dnaN, fusA, gyrB, recA, rplB, rpoS and gyrA) clusters strain SCC1 together with other 10.1601/nm.10935 strains (Fig. 2). However, sequence based phylogenetic analysis was inconclusive regarding the subspecies status. Overall, the phylogeny of 10.1601/nm.3241 species and subspecies is currently in turmoil and assigning strains to subspecies is challenging [15].
Fig. 2

Maximum likelihood tree of Pectobacterium carotovorum SCC1 and other closely related Pectobacterium strains. The phylogenetic tree was constructed from the seven housekeeping genes (dnaN, fusA, gyrB, recA, rplB, rpoS and gyrA). The concatenated sequences were aligned using MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program (version 7) with default parameters [42]. The phylogenetic tree was built in RAxML (Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood) program with Maximum likelihood (ML) inference [43]. 88 different nucleotide substitution models were tested with jModelTest 2.0 and the best model was selected using Akaike information criterion (AIC) [44]. Bootstrap values from 1000 replicates are shown in each branch. Dickeya solani IPO2222 was used as the outgroup. Type strains are marked with T after the strain name. GenBank accession numbers are presented in the parentheses. The scale bar indicates 0.04 substitutions per nucleotide position

Maximum likelihood tree of Pectobacterium carotovorum SCC1 and other closely related Pectobacterium strains. The phylogenetic tree was constructed from the seven housekeeping genes (dnaN, fusA, gyrB, recA, rplB, rpoS and gyrA). The concatenated sequences were aligned using MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program (version 7) with default parameters [42]. The phylogenetic tree was built in RAxML (Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood) program with Maximum likelihood (ML) inference [43]. 88 different nucleotide substitution models were tested with jModelTest 2.0 and the best model was selected using Akaike information criterion (AIC) [44]. Bootstrap values from 1000 replicates are shown in each branch. Dickeya solani IPO2222 was used as the outgroup. Type strains are marked with T after the strain name. GenBank accession numbers are presented in the parentheses. The scale bar indicates 0.04 substitutions per nucleotide position 10.1601/nm.10935 strain SCC1 has been deposited at the International Center for Microbial Resources - French collection of plant-associated bacteria (accession: 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DCFBP+8537). MIGS of strain SCC1 is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Classification and general features of Pectobacterium carotovorum strain SCC1 [46]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [47]
Phylum Proteobacteria TAS [48]
Class Gammaproteobacteria TAS [49, 50]
Order Enterobacterales TAS [51]
Family Pectobacteriaceae TAS [51]
Genus Pectobacterium TAS [52, 53]
Species Pectobacterium carotovorum TAS [52, 54]
Strain: SCC1 (10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DCFBP+8537)TAS [5]
Gram stainNegativeIDA
Cell shapeRodIDA
MotilityMotileIDA
SporulationNon-sporulatingNAS [51]
Temperature rangeMesophile, able to grow at 37 °CTAS [14]
Optimum temperature~28 °CIDA
pH range; OptimumUnknown
Carbon sourceSucrose, lactose, melibiose, raffinoseIDA,TAS [14]
MIGS-6HabitatPotatoTAS [5]
MIGS-6.3SalinityAble to grow in 5% NaClTAS [14]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementFacultatively anaerobicNAS [51]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipFree-livingNAS
MIGS-14PathogenicityPathogenicNAS [53]
MIGS-4Geographic locationFinlandTAS [5]
MIGS-5Sample collection1982NAS
MIGS-4.1Latitude60° 13′ 36.15” NNAS
MIGS-4.2Longitude25° 00′ 54.77″ ENAS
MIGS-4.4AltitudeUnknown

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [55]

Classification and general features of Pectobacterium carotovorum strain SCC1 [46] aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [55]

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

10.1601/nm.10935 strain SCC1 has been used as a model soft rot pathogen in the field of plant-pathogen interactions ever since its isolation in the 1980’s. The sequencing of the genome of strain SCC1 was initiated in 2008 in order to further facilitate its use as a model pathogen. The project was carried out jointly by the Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Biosciences and Department of Agricultural Sciences at the University of Helsinki, Finland. The genome was sequenced, assembled and annotated. The final sequence contains two scaffolds representing one chromosome and one plasmid. The sequence of the chromosome contains one gap of estimated length of 3788 bp. The genome sequence is deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP021894 (chromosome) and CP021895 (plasmid). Summary information of the project is presented in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS 31Finishing qualityOne gap remaining, otherwise finished
MIGS-28Libraries usedStandard 454 and Solid libraries
MIGS 29Sequencing platforms454, SOLiD, Sanger
MIGS 31.2Fold coverageChromosome 40×, plasmid 67×
MIGS 30AssemblersgsAssembler v 1.1.03.24
MIGS 32Gene calling methodProdigal
Locus TagSCC1
Genbank ID CP021894, CP021895
GenBank Date of ReleaseJuly 27, 2017
GOLD ID
BIOPROJECT PRJNA379819
MIGS 13Source Material Identifier 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DCFBP+8537
Project relevancePlant pathogen
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

After isolation from potato in 1982, 10.1601/nm.10935 strain SCC1 has been stored in 22% glycerol at −80 °C. For preparation of genomic DNA, the strain was first grown overnight on solid LB medium (10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, 10 g NaCl, and 15 g agar per one liter of medium) at 28 °C. A single colony was then picked and grown overnight in 10 ml of liquid LB medium at 28 °C with shaking. Cells were harvested by centrifugation for 20 min at 3200 g at 4 °C and resuspended into TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA). SDS (5% w/v) and Proteinase K (1 mg/ml) were used to break the cells for one hour at 50 °C. Genomic DNA was extracted using phenol-chloroform purification followed by ethanol precipitation. The quantity and quality of the DNA was assessed by spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis.

Genome sequencing and assembly

Genome sequencing was performed at DNA and Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Finland. Genomic DNA was sequenced using 454 (454 Life Sciences/Roche), SOLiD3 (Life Technologies) and ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies) instruments. DNA was fragmented into approximate size of 800 bp using Nebulizer (Roche) followed by standard fragment 454 library with the GS FLX series reagents. For the SOLiD library genomic DNA was fragmented with a Covaris S2 Sonicator (Covaris Inc.) to approximate size of 250 bp. The library was prepared using the SOLiD library kit (Life technologies).Newbler (version 1.1) was used to assemble 366,453 pyrosequencing reads (77,6 Mbp) in approximate length of 240 bp with default settings into 100 large (>1000 bp) contigs. GAP4 program (Staden package) was used for contig editing, primer design for PCRs and primer walking, and finishing the genome. Gaps were closed using PCR and traditional primer walking Sanger sequencing method. Finally, SOLiD reads were mapped to the genome and fifteen single genomic positions were fixed. Final sequencing coverages were 40× in genome and 67× in plasmid sequences.

Genome annotation

Coding sequences were predicted using the Prodigal gene prediction tool [16]. GenePRIMP [17] was run to correct systematic errors made by Prodigal and to reanalyze the remaining intergenic regions for missed CDSs. Functional annotation for the predicted genes was performed using the PANNZER annotation tool [18]. The annotation was manually curated with information from publications and the following databases: COG [19], KEGG [20], CDD [21], UniProt and NCBI non-redundant protein sequences. To identify RNA genes, RNAmmer v1.2 [22] (rRNAs) and tRNAscan-SE [23] (tRNAs) were used. Clusters of Orthologous Groups assignments and Pfam domain predictions were done using the WebMGA server [24]. Transmembrane helices were predicted with TMHMM [25] and Phobius [26]. For signal peptide prediction, SignalP 4.1 [27] was used. CRISPRFinder [28] was used to detect Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPRs).

Genome properties

The genome of 10.1601/nm.10935 SCC1 consists of one circular 4,974,798 bp chromosome and one circular 5524 bp plasmid (Table 3, Fig. 3). The total genome size is 4,980,322 bp with an overall G + C content of 51.85% (Table 4). A total of 4451 genes were predicted, out of which 4440 are chromosomal and 11 reside on the plasmid. 4349 (97.71%) genes are protein coding and 102 (2.29%) are RNA genes (77 tRNA, 22 rRNA, and 3 other RNA genes). Of the 4349 protein coding genes, 3812 (87.65%) could be assigned to COG functional categories (Table 5).
Table 3

Summary of P. carotovorum SCC1 genome: one chromosome and one plasmid

LabelSize (Mb)TopologyINSDC identifierRefSeq ID
Chromosome4.974798Circular CP021894
Plasmid pSCC10.005524Circular CP021895
Fig. 3

Circular maps of the chromosome and plasmid of Pectobacterium carotovorum SCC1. Rings from the outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), GC content, GC skew. Maps were generated using the CGView Server [45]

Table 4

Genome statistics

AttributeValue% of Total
Genome size (bp)4,980,322100.00
DNA coding (bp)4,314,06386.62
DNA G + C (bp)2,580,56451.85
DNA scaffolds2
Total genes4451100.00
Protein coding genes434997.71
RNA genes1022.29
Pseudo genesNANA
Genes in internal clustersNANA
Genes with function prediction395588.86
Genes assigned to COGs381285.64
Genes with Pfam domains378284.97
Genes with signal peptides4289.62
Genes with transmembrane helices93921.10
CRISPR repeats5
Table 5

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

CodeValue%ageDescription
J1834.21Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A20.05RNA processing and modification
K3327.63Transcription
L1613.70Replication, recombination and repair
B00.00Chromatin structure and dynamics
D400.92Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V611.40Defense mechanisms
T2425.56Signal transduction mechanisms
M2415.54Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N1142.62Cell motility
U1222.81Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O1523.50Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C2485.70Energy production and conversion
G3768.65Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E43510.00Amino acid transport and metabolism
F942.16Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1774.07Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1032.37Lipid transport and metabolism
P3187.31Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q671.54Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R44510.23General function prediction only
S3588.23Function unknown
53712.35Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Summary of P. carotovorum SCC1 genome: one chromosome and one plasmid Circular maps of the chromosome and plasmid of Pectobacterium carotovorum SCC1. Rings from the outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), GC content, GC skew. Maps were generated using the CGView Server [45] Genome statistics Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Insights from the genome sequence

10.1601/nm.10935 strain SCC1 harbors a small cryptic plasmid of 5524 bp, pSCC1. The plasmid contains sequences for RNAI and RNAII, two non-coding RNAs involved in replication initiation and control in enterobacterial RNA priming plasmids such as ColE1 [29]. A similar replication region has previously been described in the small cryptic plasmid pEC3 of 10.1601/nm.3242 strain 10.1601/strainfinder?urlappend=%3Fid%3DIFO+3380 [30]. In addition to the two RNA genes, pSCC1 was predicted to contain nine protein-coding genes. Four of these (mobABCD) encode mobilization proteins. The mob locus is required for mobilization of non-self-transmissible plasmids and is found on many enterobacterial plasmids including pEC3 [31]. No function could be assigned to the remaining five genes on pSCC1. One of them, SCC1_4463, is very similar to genes found in many 10.1601/nm.3091 genomes, especially those of genera 10.1601/nm.3148, 10.1601/nm.3092 and 10.1601/nm.3291, whereas similar genes to the other four on pSCC1 are not widely present in other sequenced genomes. 10.1601/nm.3241 infection is characterized by maceration symptoms caused by the secretion of a large arsenal of plant cell wall-degrading enzymes. Accordingly, the genome of 10.1601/nm.10935 strain SCC1 was found to contain genes for eleven pectate lyases (pelABCILWXZ, hrpW, SCC1_1311, and SCC1_2381), one pectin lyase (pnl), four polygalacturonases (pehAKNX), one oligogalacturonate lyase (ogl), three cellulases (celSV, bcsZ), one rhamnogalacturonate lyase (rhiE), two pectin methylesterases (pemAB), and two pectin acetylesterases (paeXY). In addition, the genome harbors two genes encoding proteases previously characterized as plant cell wall-degrading enzymes (prt1, prtW) as well as a number of putative proteases, some of which may function in plant cell wall degradation. Different 10.1601/nm.3241 species and strains have been found to harbor very similar collections of plant cell wall-degrading enzymes [32], and the number and types of enzymes in the genome of strain SCC1 fit this picture well. Protein secretion plays an essential role in soft rot pathogenesis [33]. The most important secretion system in 10.1601/nm.3241 is the type II secretion system, also known as the Out system (outCDEFGHIJKLMN), which transports proteins from the periplasmic space into the extracellular environment [34]. It is responsible for the secretion of most plant cell wall-degrading enzymes such as pectinases and cellulases as well as some other virulence factors such as the necrosis-inducing protein Nip [33, 35]. Furthermore, 10.1601/nm.3241 genomes typically harbor multiple type I secretion systems, which secrete proteases and adhesins [33]. At least four type I secretion systems are encoded in the genome of 10.1601/nm.10935 SCC1 (prtDEF, SCC1_1144–1146, SCC1_1589–1591, and SCC1_3286–3288). Strain SCC1 also harbors a type III secretion system cluster (SCC1_2406–2432), which has previously been characterized in this strain and shown to affect the speed of symptom development during infection [6, 36]. Overall, the role of the type III secretion system in 10.1601/nm.3241 is not well understood and 10.1601/nm.3254 and 10.1601/nm.29447 seem to lack it completely [32, 37]. The type IV secretion system has been shown to have a minor contribution to virulence of 10.1601/nm.3247 [38]. However, it is sporadically distributed among 10.1601/nm.3241 strains [33], and no type IV secretion genes could be found from the genome of 10.1601/nm.10935 SCC1. Finally, the type VI secretion system has also been shown to have a small effect on virulence at least in some 10.1601/nm.3241 species [32, 39]. In 10.1601/nm.10935 SCC1, one type VI secretion system cluster is present in the genome (SCC1_0988–1002). Soft rot pathogens have been suggested to be able to use insect vectors in transmission, and indeed, certain 10.1601/nm.10935 strains can infect Drosophila flies and persist in their guts [40]. This ability has been linked to the Evf (10.1601/nm.3165 virulence factor) protein [41]. The evf gene is present in the genome of 10.1601/nm.10935 SCC1 suggesting that the strain may have the ability to interact with insects.

Conclusions

In this study, we presented the annotated genome sequence of the pectinolytic plant pathogen 10.1601/nm.10935 SCC1 consisting of a chromosome of 4,974,798 bp and a small cryptic plasmid of 5524 bp. Strain SCC1 was originally isolated from a diseased potato tuber and it has been used as a model strain to study interactions between soft rot pathogens and their host plants for decades. In accordance with the pathogenic lifestyle, the genome of strain SCC1 was found to harbor a large arsenal of plant cell wall-degrading enzymes similar to other sequenced 10.1601/nm.3241 genomes. In addition, an insect interaction gene, evf, is present in the genome of strain SCC1 suggesting the possibility of insects as vectors or alternative hosts for this strain. The genome sequence will drive further the use of 10.1601/nm.10935 SCC1 as a model plant pathogen.
  46 in total

1.  KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.

Authors:  M Kanehisa; S Goto
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  PANNZER: high-throughput functional annotation of uncharacterized proteins in an error-prone environment.

Authors:  Patrik Koskinen; Petri Törönen; Jussi Nokso-Koivisto; Liisa Holm
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Chlorophyllase 1, a damage control enzyme, affects the balance between defense pathways in plants.

Authors:  Tarja Kariola; Günter Brader; Jing Li; E Tapio Palva
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Genome-based phylogeny and taxonomy of the 'Enterobacteriales': proposal for Enterobacterales ord. nov. divided into the families Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae fam. nov., Pectobacteriaceae fam. nov., Yersiniaceae fam. nov., Hafniaceae fam. nov., Morganellaceae fam. nov., and Budviciaceae fam. nov.

Authors:  Mobolaji Adeolu; Seema Alnajar; Sohail Naushad; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Phylogenetic position of phytopathogens within the Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  L Hauben; E R Moore; L Vauterin; M Steenackers; J Mergaert; L Verdonck; J Swings
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  The WRKY70 transcription factor: a node of convergence for jasmonate-mediated and salicylate-mediated signals in plant defense.

Authors:  Jing Li; Günter Brader; E Tapio Palva
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Priming of the Arabidopsis pattern-triggered immunity response upon infection by necrotrophic Pectobacterium carotovorum bacteria.

Authors:  Chen Po-Wen; Prashant Singh; Laurent Zimmerli
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 5.663

10.  Phylogeny and virulence of naturally occurring type III secretion system-deficient Pectobacterium strains.

Authors:  Hye-Sook Kim; Bing Ma; Nicole T Perna; Amy O Charkowski
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  8 in total

1.  Draft Genome Sequences of New Genomospecies "Candidatus Pectobacterium maceratum" Strains, Which Cause Soft Rot in Plants.

Authors:  Fedor V Shirshikov; Aleksei A Korzhenkov; Kirill K Miroshnikov; Anastasia P Kabanova; Alla P Barannik; Alexander N Ignatov; Konstantin A Miroshnikov
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2018-04-12

2.  Pectobacterium parvum sp. nov., having a Salmonella SPI-1-like Type III secretion system and low virulence.

Authors:  Miia Pasanen; Malgorzata Waleron; Thomas Schott; Ilse Cleenwerck; Agnieszka Misztak; Krzysztof Waleron; Leighton Pritchard; Ramadan Bakr; Yeshitila Degefu; Jan van der Wolf; Peter Vandamme; Minna Pirhonen
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Comparative genomics of 84 Pectobacterium genomes reveals the variations related to a pathogenic lifestyle.

Authors:  Xiaoying Li; Yali Ma; Shuqing Liang; Yu Tian; Sanjun Yin; Sisi Xie; Hua Xie
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  High genomic variability in the plant pathogenic bacterium Pectobacterium parmentieri deciphered from de novo assembled complete genomes.

Authors:  S Zoledowska; A Motyka-Pomagruk; W Sledz; A Mengoni; E Lojkowska
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Single gene enables plant pathogenic Pectobacterium to overcome host-specific chemical defence.

Authors:  Tijs J M van den Bosch; Outi Niemi; Cornelia U Welte
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 5.663

6.  The International Trade of Ware Vegetables and Orna-Mental Plants-An Underestimated Risk of Accelerated Spreading of Phytopathogenic Bacteria in the Era of Globalisation and Ongoing Climatic Changes.

Authors:  Magdalena Smoktunowicz; Joanna Jonca; Aneta Stachowska; Michal May; Michal Mateusz Waleron; Malgorzata Waleron; Krzysztof Waleron
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-06-26

7.  Diversity of Pectobacteriaceae Species in Potato Growing Regions in Northern Morocco.

Authors:  Saïd Oulghazi; Mohieddine Moumni; Slimane Khayi; Kévin Robic; Sohaib Sarfraz; Céline Lopez-Roques; Céline Vandecasteele; Denis Faure
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-06-13

8.  Genome-Wide Analyses Revealed Remarkable Heterogeneity in Pathogenicity Determinants, Antimicrobial Compounds, and CRISPR-Cas Systems of Complex Phytopathogenic Genus Pectobacterium.

Authors:  Dario Arizala; Mohammad Arif
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2019-11-20
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.