Marco A Versiani1, Kleber K T Carvalho2, Jardel F Mazzi-Chaves2, Manoel D Sousa-Neto2. 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: marcoversiani@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the shaping ability of the XP-endo Shaper (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland), iRaCe (FKG Dentaire SA), and EdgeFile (EdgeEndo, Albuquerque, NM) systems using micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) technology. METHODS: Thirty long oval-shaped canals from mandibular incisors were matched anatomically using micro-CT scanning (SkyScan1174v2; Bruker-microCT, Kontich, Belgium) and distributed into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the canal preparation protocol (ie, XP-endo Shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile systems). Coregistered images, before and after preparation, were evaluated for morphometric measurements of the volume, surface area, structure model index (SMI), untouched walls, area, perimeter, roundness, and diameter. Data were statistically compared between groups using the 1-way analysis of variance post hoc Tukey test and within groups with the paired sample t test (α = 5%). RESULTS: Within groups, preparation significantly increased all tested parameters (P < .05). No statistical difference was observed in the mean percentage increase of the volume (〜52%) and surface area (10.8%-14.2%) or the mean percentage of the remaining unprepared canal walls between groups (8.17%-9.83%) (P > .05). The XP-endo Shaper significantly altered the overall geometry of the root canal to a more conical shape (SMI = 2.59) when compared with the other groups (P < .05). After preparation protocols, changes in area, perimeter, roundness, and minor and major diameters of the root canals in the 5 mm of the root apex showed no difference between groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The XP-endo Shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile systems showed a similar shaping ability. Despite the XP-endo Shaper had significantly altered the overall geometry of the root canal to a more conical shape, neither technique was capable of completely preparing the long oval-shaped canals of mandibular incisors.
INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the shaping ability of the XP-endo Shaper (FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland), iRaCe (FKG Dentaire SA), and EdgeFile (EdgeEndo, Albuquerque, NM) systems using micro-computed tomographic (micro-CT) technology. METHODS: Thirty long oval-shaped canals from mandibular incisors were matched anatomically using micro-CT scanning (SkyScan1174v2; Bruker-microCT, Kontich, Belgium) and distributed into 3 groups (n = 10) according to the canal preparation protocol (ie, XP-endo Shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile systems). Coregistered images, before and after preparation, were evaluated for morphometric measurements of the volume, surface area, structure model index (SMI), untouched walls, area, perimeter, roundness, and diameter. Data were statistically compared between groups using the 1-way analysis of variance post hoc Tukey test and within groups with the paired sample t test (α = 5%). RESULTS: Within groups, preparation significantly increased all tested parameters (P < .05). No statistical difference was observed in the mean percentage increase of the volume (〜52%) and surface area (10.8%-14.2%) or the mean percentage of the remaining unprepared canal walls between groups (8.17%-9.83%) (P > .05). The XP-endo Shaper significantly altered the overall geometry of the root canal to a more conical shape (SMI = 2.59) when compared with the other groups (P < .05). After preparation protocols, changes in area, perimeter, roundness, and minor and major diameters of the root canals in the 5 mm of the root apex showed no difference between groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The XP-endo Shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile systems showed a similar shaping ability. Despite the XP-endo Shaper had significantly altered the overall geometry of the root canal to a more conical shape, neither technique was capable of completely preparing the long oval-shaped canals of mandibular incisors.