Jose Luis Perez-Gracia1, Yohann Loriot2, Jonathan E Rosenberg3, Thomas Powles4, Andrea Necchi5, Syed A Hussain6, Rafael Morales-Barrera7, Margitta M Retz8, Günter Niegisch9, Ignacio Durán10, Christine Théodore11, Enrique Grande12, Xiaodong Shen13, Jingjing Wang13, Betty Nelson13, Christina L Derleth13, Michiel S van der Heijden14. 1. Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. Electronic address: jlgracia@unav.es. 2. Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Département de Médecine, Villejuif, France. 3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. 5. Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 6. Plymouth University, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University Hospitals NHS Trust, Devon, UK. 7. Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 8. Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. 9. Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 10. Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain. 11. Department of Oncology, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France. 12. Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain. 13. Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA. 14. Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who progress after platinum-based chemotherapy have had few treatment options and uniformly poor outcomes. Atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1) was approved in the USA for cisplatin-ineligible and platinum-treated mUC based on IMvigor210, a phase 2, single-arm, two-cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab by the number of prior lines of systemic therapy in patients with pretreated mUC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: IMvigor210 enrolled 315 patients with mUC with progression during or following platinum-based therapy at 70 international sites between May 2014 and November 2014. Key inclusion criteria included age ≥18 yr, creatinine clearance ≥30ml/min, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, with no limit on prior lines of treatment. INTERVENTION: Patients in this cohort received atezolizumab 1200mg intravenously every 3 wk until loss of clinical benefit. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Centrally assessed Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v1.1 objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response, overall survival (OS), and adverse events were evaluated by prior treatment. Potential differences between subgroups were evaluated using log-rank (for OS) and chi-square (for ORR and adverse events frequencies) testing. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Three hundred and ten patients were efficacy and safety evaluable (median follow-up, 21 mo). Objective responses and prolonged OS occurred across all prespecified subgroups; median duration of response was not reached in most subgroups. In patients without prior systemic mUC therapy (first-line subgroup), ORR was 25% (95% confidence interval: 14-38), and median OS was 9.6 mo (95% confidence interval: 5.9-15.8). No significant differences in efficacy or toxicity by therapy line were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety in previously treated patients with mUC across all lines of therapy evaluated. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated effects of previous treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma that progressed after platinum-based therapy. Atezolizumab was active and tolerable no matter how many treatment regimens patients had received. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02108652.
BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who progress after platinum-based chemotherapy have had few treatment options and uniformly poor outcomes. Atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1) was approved in the USA for cisplatin-ineligible and platinum-treated mUC based on IMvigor210, a phase 2, single-arm, two-cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab by the number of prior lines of systemic therapy in patients with pretreated mUC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: IMvigor210 enrolled 315 patients with mUC with progression during or following platinum-based therapy at 70 international sites between May 2014 and November 2014. Key inclusion criteria included age ≥18 yr, creatinine clearance ≥30ml/min, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, with no limit on prior lines of treatment. INTERVENTION: Patients in this cohort received atezolizumab 1200mg intravenously every 3 wk until loss of clinical benefit. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Centrally assessed Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v1.1 objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response, overall survival (OS), and adverse events were evaluated by prior treatment. Potential differences between subgroups were evaluated using log-rank (for OS) and chi-square (for ORR and adverse events frequencies) testing. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Three hundred and ten patients were efficacy and safety evaluable (median follow-up, 21 mo). Objective responses and prolonged OS occurred across all prespecified subgroups; median duration of response was not reached in most subgroups. In patients without prior systemic mUC therapy (first-line subgroup), ORR was 25% (95% confidence interval: 14-38), and median OS was 9.6 mo (95% confidence interval: 5.9-15.8). No significant differences in efficacy or toxicity by therapy line were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety in previously treated patients with mUC across all lines of therapy evaluated. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated effects of previous treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma that progressed after platinum-based therapy. Atezolizumab was active and tolerable no matter how many treatment regimens patients had received. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02108652.
Authors: Joaquim Bellmunt; Toni K Choueiri; Ronan Fougeray; Fabio A B Schutz; Yacine Salhi; Eric Winquist; Stéphane Culine; Hans von der Maase; David J Vaughn; Jonathan E Rosenberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew D Galsky; Noah M Hahn; Jonathan Rosenberg; Guru Sonpavde; Thomas Hutson; William K Oh; Robert Dreicer; Nicholas Vogelzang; Cora N Sternberg; Dean F Bajorin; Joaquim Bellmunt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas Powles; Joseph Paul Eder; Gregg D Fine; Fadi S Braiteh; Yohann Loriot; Cristina Cruz; Joaquim Bellmunt; Howard A Burris; Daniel P Petrylak; Siew-leng Teng; Xiaodong Shen; Zachary Boyd; Priti S Hegde; Daniel S Chen; Nicholas J Vogelzang Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Jean-Charles Soria; Marcin Kowanetz; Gregg D Fine; Omid Hamid; Michael S Gordon; Jeffery A Sosman; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Scott N Gettinger; Holbrook E K Kohrt; Leora Horn; Donald P Lawrence; Sandra Rost; Maya Leabman; Yuanyuan Xiao; Ahmad Mokatrin; Hartmut Koeppen; Priti S Hegde; Ira Mellman; Daniel S Chen; F Stephen Hodi Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: P J Loehrer; L H Einhorn; P J Elson; E D Crawford; P Kuebler; I Tannock; D Raghavan; R Stuart-Harris; M F Sarosdy; B A Lowe Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hans von der Maase; Lisa Sengelov; James T Roberts; Sergio Ricci; Luigi Dogliotti; T Oliver; Malcolm J Moore; Annamaria Zimmermann; Michael Arning Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew D Galsky; Susan Krege; Chia-Chi Lin; Noah Hahn; Thorsten H Ecke; Erin Moshier; Guru Sonpavde; James Godbold; William K Oh; Aristotle Bamias Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2013-02-18 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: G R Pond; J Bellmunt; J E Rosenberg; D F Bajorin; A M Regazzi; T K Choueiri; A Q Qu; G Niegisch; P Albers; A Necchi; G Di Lorenzo; R Fougeray; Y-N Wong; S S Sridhar; Y-J Ko; M I Milowsky; M D Galsky; G Sonpavde Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2014-06-09 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Judit Börcsök; Zsofia Sztupinszki; Raie Bekele; Sizhi P Gao; Miklos Diossy; Amruta S Samant; Kasia M Dillon; Viktoria Tisza; Sándor Spisák; Orsolya Rusz; Istvan Csabai; Helle Pappot; Zoë J Frazier; David J Konieczkowski; David Liu; Naresh Vasani; James A Rodrigues; David B Solit; Jean H Hoffman-Censits; Elizabeth R Plimack; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean-Bernard Lazaro; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Gopa Iyer; Søren Brunak; Rita Lozsa; Eliezer M Van Allen; Dávid Szüts; Kent W Mouw; Zoltan Szallasi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 13.801