| Literature DB >> 29272422 |
Jing Wang1, Chao Feng1, Tenglong Jiao1,2, Eric Bishop Von Wettberg3, Ming Kang1,4.
Abstract
Both genetic drift and divergent selection are expected to be strong evolutionary forces driving population differentiation on edaphic habitat islands. However, the relative contribution of genetic drift and divergent selection to population divergence has rarely been tested simultaneously. In this study, restriction-site associated DNA-based population genomic analyses were applied to assess the relative importance of drift and divergent selection on population divergence of Primulina juliae, an edaphic specialist from southern China. All populations were found with low standing genetic variation, small effective population size (NE), and signatures of bottlenecks. Populations with the lowest genetic variation were most genetically differentiated from other populations and the extent of genetic drift increased with geographic distance from other populations. Together with evidence of isolation by distance, these results support neutral drift as a critical evolutionary driver. Nonetheless, redundancy analysis revealed that genomic variation is significantly associated with both edaphic habitats and climatic factors independently of spatial effects. Moreover, more genomic variation was explained by environmental factors than by geographic variables, suggesting that local adaptation might have played an important role in driving population divergence. Finally, outlier tests and environment association analyses identified 31 single-nucleotide polymorphisms as candidates for adaptive divergence. Among these candidates, 26 single-nucleotide polymorphisms occur in/near genes that potentially play a role in adaptation to edaphic specialization. This study has important implications that improve our understanding of the joint roles of genetic drift and adaptation in generating population divergence and diversity of edaphic specialists.Entities:
Keywords: Primulina juliae; adaptation; edaphic specialist; isolation by distance; isolation by environment; population genomics
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29272422 PMCID: PMC5751081 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evx263
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol Evol ISSN: 1759-6653 Impact factor: 3.416
. 1.—Habitat pictures for Primulina juliae in Karst and Danxia (A), sampling sites (inset map shows the sampling location on China map) for ten populations of P. juliae analyzed in the present study (B), and the results for structure analysis (C). Red and black dots indicate Danxia and Karst habitat, respectively.
Sampling Information, Summary Statistics of Polymorphism, Effective Population Size Estimates, and the Results of Bottleneck Test for Ten Populations of Primulina juliae Based on 5,176 SNP Loci
| Population | Latitude (°N) | Longitude (°E) | Habitat | PPL | Wilcoxon’s Sign-Rank Test | Mode-Shift Test | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMNH | 26.32 | 116.83 | Karst | 8 | 6.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.020 | 0.022 | 0.065 | 2.3 (2.1–2.5) | 0.000 | Shifted mode |
| JXLH | 27.28 | 113.91 | Karst | 5 | 6.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.021 | 0.021 | −0.043 | 3.9 (3.1–4.9) | 0.000 | Shifted mode |
| CZYX | 26.12 | 113.13 | Danxia | 7 | 14.5 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.047 | 0.052 | 0.064 | 2.1 (2.0–2.2) | 0.000 | Shifted mode |
| WHYA | 25.70 | 112.94 | Karst | 7 | 12.7 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.070 | 0.047 | −0.307 | 1.3 (1.2–1.3) | 0.000 | Shifted mode |
| CZYA | 25.43 | 113.02 | Danxia | 7 | 22.3 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.069 | 0.071 | 0.012 | 4.6 (3.9–5.4) | 0.000 | Shifted mode |
| GDLA | 25.39 | 113.18 | Karst | 6 | 16.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.050 | 0.057 | 0.083 | 5.0 (4.0–6.1) | 0.000 | Shifted mode |
| CZYB | 25.35 | 112.85 | Karst | 5 | 16.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.052 | 0.056 | 0.041 | 6.3 (4.8–8.0) | 0.000 | Shifted mode |
| GDLB | 25.28 | 113.06 | Danxia | 8 | 23.5 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.064 | 0.071 | 0.074 | 5.9 (4.9–6.8) | 0.000 | Shifted mode |
| CZYC | 25.05 | 112.94 | Karst | 6 | 18.4 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.056 | 0.063 | 0.074 | 6.3 (5.1–7.6) | 0.000 | Shifted mode |
| GDTL | 24.51 | 113.69 | Karst | 6 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.012 | 0.013 | 0.078 | 2.9 (2.4–3.4) | 0.000 | Shifted mode |
Note.— N, the number of individuals analyzed; PPL (%), percentage of polymorphic SNP loci; A, number of alleles; Ae, effective number of alleles; HO, observed heterozygosity; HE, expected heterozygosity; FIS, fixation index; NE (95% CI), effective population size estimates with 95% confidence intervals.
Pairwise FST Values among Ten Populations of Primulina juliae Based on 5,176 SNP Loci
| Population | SMNH | JXLH | CZYX | WHYA | CZYA | GDLA | CZYB | GDLB | CZYC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JXLH | 0.863 | ||||||||
| CZYX | 0.874 | 0.807 | |||||||
| WHYA | 0.888 | 0.837 | 0.620 | ||||||
| CZYA | 0.848 | 0.759 | 0.645 | 0.712 | |||||
| GDLA | 0.868 | 0.795 | 0.687 | 0.748 | 0.401 | ||||
| CZYB | 0.868 | 0.802 | 0.657 | 0.720 | 0.372 | 0.536 | |||
| GDLB | 0.830 | 0.732 | 0.626 | 0.690 | 0.361 | 0.495 | 0.152 | ||
| CZYC | 0.852 | 0.770 | 0.658 | 0.720 | 0.450 | 0.535 | 0.433 | 0.332 | |
| GDTL | 0.944 | 0.935 | 0.851 | 0.879 | 0.737 | 0.798 | 0.787 | 0.712 | 0.776 |
Note.—All P-values < 0.0001.
. 2.—Relationships among Primulina juliae populations inferred using the maximum likelihood method implemented in treemix. Colors correspond to those in figure 1C. treemix also inferred five migration events (depicted by dotted arrows) among populations.
. 3.—Geographic, environmental, and genetic correlations. Correlation of mean pairwise geographic distance versus mean pairwise FST (A), and correlation of mean pairwise environmental distance versus mean pairwise FST (B).
Results of RDA Significance Tests (the Proportion of Genotypic Variance Explained, df and P-values Obtained through 1,000 Permutations; Significant P-values are in Bold), Detailed for the Full RDA Analysis (Model with All Significant Terms), and the Marginal Effect of Each Constraining Variable in the Model
| RDA | Conditioned RDA | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of Variance Explained | df | % of Variance Explained | df | |||
| Global analysis | 40.90 | 5 | — | |||
| 59.10 | 59 | — | ||||
| Marginal test | ||||||
| Habitat | 5.90 | 1 | 5.90 | 1 | ||
| Clim_PC1 | 8.00 | 1 | 7.90 | 1 | ||
| Clim_PC2 | 6.00 | 1 | 6.00 | 1 | ||
| Longitude | 8.40 | 1 | 8.40 | 1 | ||
| Latitude | 7.60 | 1 | 7.10 | 1 | ||
| 59.10 | 59 | — | 59.10 | 59 | — | |
Note.—The marginal effect of each constraining variable was tested through permutation tests by removing each term one by one from the model containing all other terms. The conditioned RDA reported conditioned (partial) RDA significance tests for each term, after conditioning on other constraining variables to remove their confounding effects.
Summary of RDA Analyses for Ten Populations of Primulina juliae
| RAD Axis | RDA1 | RDA2 | RDA3 | RDA4 | RDA5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % of variance explained | 12.846 | 8.159 | 7.867 | 6.254 | 5.771 |
| Constraining variables | |||||
| Habitat | 0.344 | −0.072 | −0.528 | 0.698 | −0.332 |
| Clim_PC1 | 0.430 | −0.019 | 0.582 | 0.687 | −0.068 |
| Clim_PC2 | −0.788 | −0.199 | 0.575 | −0.009 | −0.097 |
| Longitude | 0.991 | −0.061 | 0.098 | 0.003 | −0.072 |
| Latitude | 0.516 | 0.276 | −0.566 | −0.580 | 0.023 |
Note.—The proportion of genotypic variance explained by each RDA axis is provided, along with the vector coordinates of each constraining variable in the RDA space (see fig. 4). For each RDA axis, the longest vector projection indicates the most important variable explaining variation along that axis.
. 4.—Multivariate SNP–environment associations. (A) First two canonical axes (RDA1 and RDA2) and RDA of variation in 5,176 SNPs among 65 samples. Each canonical axis represents a linear combination of environmental variables (strongly loading variables shown as arrows) that explains variation in a linear combination of SNPs among samples (colored points represent samples from different populations as shown in the legend). (B) Proportion of total SNP variation among samples explained in RDA by habitat type (Hab, 5.9%), climatic variable (Clim, 14.0%), spatial structure (Geo, 14.7%), or their collinear effect (Col, 6.3%), respectively. Res (59.1%) means residual. The permutation test indicated that both habitat type and environment factors were significant predictors of genotypic variation independently of geographical distance (P = 0.001).