| Literature DB >> 29270670 |
Chi Lv1,2, Heling Wang1, Yuxin Tong3, Hongzhuan Yin1, Dalu Wang1, Zhaopeng Yan1, Yichao Liang1, Di Wu1, Qi Su4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: B-cell translocation gene 3 (BTG3) has been identified as a candidate driver gene for various cancers, but its specific role in colorectal cancer (CRC) is poorly understood. We aimed to investigate the relationship between expression of BTG3 and clinicopathological features and prognosis, as well as to explore the effects and the role of a possible BTG3 molecular mechanism on aggressive colorectal cancer behavior.Entities:
Keywords: BTG3; Biological behavior; Colorectal cancer; Genomic microarray; Prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29270670 PMCID: PMC5794823 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2561-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ISSN: 0171-5216 Impact factor: 4.553
Fig. 1Expression of BTG3 in clinical paraffin-embedded CRC tissues and survival analysis of BTG3 expression in patients with CRC. a Strong positive expression of BTG3 in adjacent normal colorectal tissues (×400). b Moderate cytoplasmic BTG3 staining in adenocarcinoma tissues (×400). c Weak expression of BTG3 in mucinous adenocarcinoma tissues (×400). Arrows indicate the cytoplasmic BTG3 staining. d IHC analysis results of BTG3 expression in 140 patients with CRC. Mean optical density (MOD) values were significantly lower in CRC tissues than paired adjacent normal colorectal tissues (p < 0.0001). e Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for overall survival rate of patients with high and low BTG3 expression (p = 0.0045). f Kaplan–Meier survival analysis for disease-free survival rate of patients with high and low BTG3 expression (p = 0.0011)
The relationship between BTG3 expression and clinicopathological features of colon carcinomas
| Variables | Total number | BTG3 expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOD | SD |
| ||
| Gender | 0.599 | |||
| Male | 78 | 0.270 | 0.056 | |
| Female | 62 | 0.264 | 0.061 | |
| Age (years) | 0.649 | |||
| < 62 | 70 | 0.269 | 0.055 | |
| ≥ 62 | 70 | 0.265 | 0.061 | |
| Tumor location | 0.991 | |||
| Right sided | 93 | 0.267 | 0.056 | |
| Transverse sided | 6 | 0.268 | 0.070 | |
| Left sided | 41 | 0.268 | 0.063 | |
| Pathological classification | 0.037* | |||
| Well/moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma | 118 | 0.271 | 0.060 | |
| Poorly differentiated/mucinous adenocarcinoma | 22 | 0.247 | 0.044 | |
| Depth of invasion | 0.016* | |||
| T1-2 | 10 | 0.300 | 0.037 | |
| T3-4 | 130 | 0.265 | 0.059 | |
| Lymphatic invasion | 0.101 | |||
| Negative | 82 | 0.274 | 0.055 | |
| Positive | 58 | 0.258 | 0.062 | |
| Distant metastasis | 0.024* | |||
| MO | 135 | 0.269 | 0.058 | |
| M1 | 5 | 0.210 | 0.030 | |
| TNM staging | 0.007* | |||
| I | 6 | 0.318 | 0.014 | |
| II | 75 | 0.271 | 0.055 | |
| III | 55 | 0.261 | 0.061 | |
| IV | 4 | 0.203 | 0.029 | |
| Vascular invasion | ||||
| No | 118 | 0.269 | 0.059 | 0.448 |
| Yes | 22 | 0.259 | 0.053 | |
| Nerve invasion | ||||
| No | 109 | 0.268 | 0.056 | 0.718 |
| Yes | 31 | 0.264 | 0.066 | |
SD standard deviation, MOD mean optical density
*p < 0.05
Univariate and multivariate analyses of individual parameters for correlation with OS or DFS rate
| Variables | OS |
| DFS |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative risk (95% CI) | Relative risk (95% CI) | |||
| Univariate analysis | ||||
| BTG3 MOD | ||||
| (> 0.2285 | 0.338 (0.154–0.741) | 0.007* | ||
| (≥ 0.2345 | 0.305 (0.143–0.651) | 0.002* | ||
| Differentiation (poorly vs well/moderate) | 1.094 (0.375–3.187) | 0.870 | 0.995 (0.345–2.870) | 0.993 |
| Pathological classification (mucinous vs tubular) | 1.827 (0.625–5.337) | 0.271 | 1.558 (0.540–4.493) | 0.412 |
| Depth of invasion (T3-4 vs T1-2) | 1.748 (0.236–12.945) | 0.584 | 0.969 (0.230–4.088) | 0.965 |
| Lymphatic invasion (positive vs negative) | 2.667 (1.178–6.037) | 0.019* | 2.398 (1.123–5.121) | 0.024* |
| Distant metastasis (positive vs negative) | 1.043 (0.141–7.714) | 0.967 | 0.962 (0.131–7.080) | 0.970 |
| TNM staging (III/IV vs I/II) | 2.600 (1.149–5.884) | 0.022* | 2.321 (1.087–4.956) | 0.030* |
| Vascular invasion (positive vs negative) | 1.166 (0.400-3.401) | 0.779 | 0.961 (0.333–2.771) | 0.942 |
| Nerve invasion (positive vs negative) | 1.167 (0.466–2.923) | 0.742 | 0.980 (0.397–2.418) | 0.966 |
| Multivariate analysis | ||||
| BTG3 MOD | 0.378 (0.171–0.837) | 0.016* | ||
| (≥ 0.2285 vs < 0.2285) for OS | ||||
| (≥ 0.2345 vs < 0.2345) for DFS | 0.331 (0.154–0.710) | 0.005* | ||
| Differentiation (poorly vs well/moderate) | NA | NA | ||
| Pathological classification (mucinous vs tubular) | NA | NA | ||
| Depth of invasion (T3-4 vs T1-2) | NA | NA | ||
| Lymphatic invasion (positive vs negative) | 2.362 (1.035–5.39) | 0.041* | 2.131 (0.992–4.574) | 0.047* |
| Distant metastasis (positive vs negative) | NA | NA | ||
| TNM staging (III/IV vs I/II) | NA | NA | ||
| Vascular invasion (positive vs negative) | NA | NA | ||
| Nerve invasion (positive vs negative) | NA | NA | ||
OS overall survival, DFS disease-free survival, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, MOD mean optical density, NA not applicable
*p < 0.05
Fig. 2The effects of BTG3 knockdown on the phenotypes in CRC cells. a Western blotting analysis of BTG3 expression in six cell lines. b Western blotting analysis of BTG3 expression in HCT116 and LoVo cells with BTG3 knockdown. c Promotive effect of BTG3 knockdown on cell proliferation in vitro by the CCK-8 assay. d BTG3 knockdown decreased the percentage of G2 phase cells in the cell cycle transition. e Inhibitory effect of BTG3 knockdown on cell apoptosis. f HCT116 cells and LoVo cells with BTG3 knockdown showed an enhanced ability to migrate and invade. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with that in the BTG3/NC group
Fig. 3Microarray analysis and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of HCT 116 cells with BTG3 knockdown. a Heatmap representation of genes that were significantly differentially expressed in BTG3 cells infected with lentivirus expressing either BTG3/shRNA or NC/shRNA. Genes and samples are listed in rows and columns, respectively. A color scale for the normalized expression data is shown at the bottom of the microarray heatmap (red represents upregulated genes and green represents downregulated genes). b The IPA system revealed several dysregulated cellular and molecular functions. Here, the top ten diseases and functions were sorted in descending order by the inverse log of the p value. c Histogram shows the enrichment of differentially expressed genes in the classical signaling pathways. Activated (orange) and inhibited (blue) canonical pathways based on IPA databases were sorted in descending order by the inverse log of the p value. d The schematic diagram showed several major roles of the extracellular-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated kinase (ERK/MAPK) signaling pathway
Fig. 4Western blotting validation of downstream genes indicated by the microarray and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) data in HCT116 cell lines. a IPA shows several molecules involved in extracellular-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated kinase (ERK/MAPK) signaling changed in response to BTG3 knockdown. b The differential expression of molecules was screened by western blotting. c Representative histograms depicting validation of the involved proteins. *p < 0.05, compared with the BTG3/negative control (NC) group