| Literature DB >> 29269119 |
P Ram Manohar1, Oleg Sorokin2, James Chacko3, Vasudevan Nampoothiri3.
Abstract
The present study is a comparison of the data of spectral analysis of heart rate variability with clinical evaluation of pathological state of doshas. The calculated cardiointervalography values are combined into three integral indexes, which according to the authors' opinion reflect the influence on heart rhythm of vata, pitta and kapha, the regulation systems of the body known as doshas in Ayurveda. Seven gross dosha imbalances were assessed to test the agreement between the two methods in this study. Heart Rate Variability (HRV) spectral data was collected from 42 participants to make the comparison with the clinical assessment of dosha imbalance. Clinical method of dosha assessment and method of calculating integral indexes by cardiointervalography data showed substantial agreement by Kappa coefficient statistic (k = 0.78) in assessment of gross dosha imbalance. The results of the data generated from this pilot study warrant further studies to rigorously validate the algorithms of HRV analysis in understanding dosha imbalance in Ayurvedic clinical practice and research settings.Entities:
Keywords: Ayurveda; Heart rate variability; Spectral analysis
Year: 2017 PMID: 29269119 PMCID: PMC6033724 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2017.06.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Fig. 2VLF, LF and HF spectrums.
Fig. 3Balance of the doshas.
Fig. 1Cardiac cycle duration variations.
Age and Gender wise distribution of patients.
| Age group | 21–30 | 31–40 | 41–50 | 51–60 | 61–70 | 71–80 | 81–90 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 16 |
| Female | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 26 |
| Total | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 42 |
Diagnostic agreement between HRV analysis and clinical assessment of dosha.
| Clinical method | HRV analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | P | K | VP | VK | KP | VPK | |
| V | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| P | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| K | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| VP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| VK | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 1 | 1 |
| KP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| VPK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The clinical diagnosis of the study participants who participated in the study.
| Allopathic diagnosis (number of participants) | Ayurvedic diagnosis |
|---|---|
| Brachial neuralgia (1) | |
| Cervical spondylosis (1) | |
| Diabetes melittus (1) | |
| Gouty arthritis (2) | |
| Ligament tear (1) | |
| Low back ache (2) | |
| Lumbar spondylosis (3) | |
| Obesity (1) | |
| Osteoarthritis (11) | |
| Partial paralysis (1) | |
| Peripheral neuropathy (1) | |
| Psoriasis (1) | |
| Rheumatoid arthritis (4) | |
| Sciatica (11) | |
| Sinusitis (1) |
Dosha vikriti categories of study participants.
| HRV analysis | Clinical assessment | |
|---|---|---|
| V | 5 | 2 |
| P | 0 | 0 |
| K | 0 | 0 |
| VP | 15 | 17 |
| VK | 17 | 21 |
| KP | 3 | 1 |
| VPK | 2 | 1 |