Literature DB >> 2926784

Which of two individuals do you treat when only their ages are different and you can't treat both?

P A Lewis1, M Charny.   

Abstract

A relative value of life dependent on age has been produced from a survey of 721 randomly selected individuals together with other observations of professional practice. The results are presented in diagrammatic form. If two identical people, except for age, present for medical treatment for a life-threatening condition and only one can be treated then the diagram indicates what the choice should be.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiff Health Survey; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh：

Year:  1989        PMID： 2926784      PMCID： PMC1375759          DOI： 10.1136/jme.15.1.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN： 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  QALYfying the value of life.

Authors:  J Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.903
  1 in total
  14 in total

1.  Equity versus efficiency: a dilemma for the NHS. If the NHS is serious about equity it must offer guidance when principles conflict.

Authors:  F Sassi; J Le Grand; L Archard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

Review 2.  Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: a review of the debate and empirical evidence.

Authors:  David L B Schwappach
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Cervical cancer as a priority for prevention in different world regions: an evaluation using years of life lost.

Authors:  Binh H Yang; Freddie I Bray; D Maxwell Parkin; John W Sellors; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  The value of thinly spread QALYs.

Authors:  Duncan Mortimer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Rationing: the search for sunlight.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991 Dec 21-28

6.  How do people value life?

Authors:  Meng Li; Jeffrey Vietri; Alison P Galvani; Gretchen B Chapman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-12-22

7.  Challenges in health state valuation in paediatric economic evaluation: are QALYs contraindicated?

Authors:  Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study.

Authors:  P Dolan; R Cookson; B Ferguson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-03

9.  A note on the relative importance that people attach to different factors when setting priorities in health care.

Authors:  Paul Dolan; Rebecca Shaw
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Accuracy of the Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease Score in Estimating Pretransplant Mortality Among Pediatric Liver Transplant Candidates.

Authors:  Chung-Chou H Chang; Cindy L Bryce; Benjamin L Shneider; Jonathan G Yabes; Yi Ren; Gabriel L Zenarosa; Heather Tomko; Drew M Donnell; Robert H Squires; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 16.193
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.