Literature DB >> 29267625

2017 Guidelines for Arterial Hypertension Management in Primary Health Care in Portuguese Language Countries.

Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira1, Miguel Mendes2, Marcus Vinícius Bolívar Malachias3,4, João Morais5, Osni Moreira6, Armando Serra Coelho7, Daniel Pires Capingana8, Vanda Azevedo9, Irenita Soares9, Alda Menete10,11, Beatriz Ferreira10,11, Miryan Bandeira Dos Prazeres Cassandra Soares12, Mário Fernandes13.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29267625      PMCID: PMC5729773          DOI: 10.5935/abc.20170165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol        ISSN: 0066-782X            Impact factor:   2.000


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) goal to reduce mortality due to chronic non-communicable diseases (CNCD) by 2% per year requires a huge effort from countries.[1-4] This challenge for health professionals asks for a global political action on control of social measures, with cost-effective population interventions to reduce CNCD and their risk factors (RF). Health professionals should demand from their government the implementation of acceptable cost measures, such as tobacco cessation counseling, guidance on healthy feeding practices and need for regular physical exercise, systemic arterial hypertension (SAH) control, and promotion of teaching and updating activities in programs directed to those issues. Those measures would contribute with around 70% of the goal of 2% per year reduction in CNCD.[2,5] Dyslipidemia, SAH and obesity are highly prevalent multifactorial diseases in Portuguese language countries (PLC).[5,6] Systemic arterial hypertension is the major RF for complications, such as stroke, acute myocardial infarction and chronic kidney disease, corresponding in importance to dyslipidemia and obesity for the development of atherosclerotic diseases.[5,6] In addition to their significant epidemiological impact, the non-pharmacological treatment of those cardiovascular RF plays a relevant economic role in the expenditures of the Ministries of Health, Social Security and Economy, because those affections are major causes directly or indirectly involved with absenteeism in the workplace. There is evidence that preventive actions are more promising in the primary health care setting. The number of adults with SAH increased from 594 million in 1975 to 1.13 billion in 2015, being 597 million men and 529 million women. That increase might be due to both population aging and increase in number.[6] When analyzing the trends in blood pressure (BP) levels of 19.1 million adults from several population studies in the past four decades (1975-2015), the elevated levels shifted from high-socioeconomic-level countries to low-intermediate-socioeconomic-level countries of South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. However, BP levels remain high in Eastern and Central Europe and Latin America.[6] Several trends were identified when analyzing the proportional mortality and percentage change in the mortality rates due to hypertensive diseases and their outcomes, ischemic heart diseases (IHD) and stroke, in the PLC from 1990 to 2015 (Table 1). The highest proportional mortality rates due to hypertensive diseases were observed in Brazil, Mozambique and Angola. Portugal had the highest human development index (HDI) in 2015 and the highest mortality due to stroke.[7-9] The reduced access, around 50-65%, to essential pharmacological treatment in low-and low-intermediate-socioeconomic-level countries might have contributed to those results. In addition, in 40% of those countries there is less than 1 physician per 1000 in habitants, and a small number of hospital beds for the care of the uncontrolled-SAH-related outcomes.[7] Thus, joint actions to implement primary prevention measures can reduce the outcomes related to hypertensive disease, especially IHD and stroke. It is mandatory to ensure the implementation of guidelines for the management of SAH via a continuous process, involving educational actions, lifestyle changes and guaranteed access to pharmacological treatment.
Table 1

Proportional mortality and annual percentage of change in mortality rates in both sexes, all ages, from 1990 to 2015, due to hypertensive disease, ischemic heart disease and stroke, in addition to human development index (HDI) and population in 2015

CountriesHypertensive diseaseIschemic heart diseaseStrokeHDI 2015Population 2015*
Proportional mortality (annual % change in mortality rates)
Brazil1.77 (+1.79)14.44 (+0.44)10.61 (+0.12)0.754*205,002,000
Mozambique1.46 (+0.27)3.84 (+1.25)5.37 (+0.52)0.418*25,727,911
Angola1.28 (-0.97)4.65 (-0.96)5.35 (-1.09)0.533*25,789,024
Portugal1.08 (+1.20)12.71 (-1.32)14.96 (-2.32)0.843*10,374,822
Guinea-Bissau0.53 (-0.43)4.87 (+0.25)5.07 (+0.22)0.424*1,844,000
East Timor1.33 (+0.38)11.84 (+1.16)10.02 (+0.57)0.605*1,212,107
MacaoNANANA0.566#642,900
Cape Verde0.75 (-0.62)11.74 (+1.34)13.74 (-0.18)0.648*524,833
Saint Thomas and Prince0.44 (-0.55)8.18 (-0.41)10.22 (-0.18)0.574*190,000

last year available - 2015,

last year available - 2014, NA: not available. Source:[7-9]

Proportional mortality and annual percentage of change in mortality rates in both sexes, all ages, from 1990 to 2015, due to hypertensive disease, ischemic heart disease and stroke, in addition to human development index (HDI) and population in 2015 last year available - 2015, last year available - 2014, NA: not available. Source:[7-9]

Diagnosis and classification

The risk resulting from high BP levels increases with age, and every 2-mmHg elevation is associated with a 7% and a 10% increase in the risk of death due to IHD and stroke, respectively.[2] At the medical office, BP can be assessed by use of either the automated or auscultatory method, being elevated when systolic BP (SBP) ≥ 140 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥ 90 mm Hg, at least on two occasions. The diagnosis of SAH is based on the measurement at the doctor's office of two or more high BP values on at least two occasions. The classification of BP according to measurements taken at the medical office, for individuals older than 18 years, is shown in Table 2. Ambulatory BP monitoring for 24 hours (ABPM) or home BP monitoring (HBPM) can help in the diagnosis of white-coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH). The WCH relates to the difference between BP measured at the office (high) and that measured with ABPM or HBPM (normal). In MH, the situation is the opposite (Figure 1). In view of the suspicion of WCH and MH, ABPM is mandatory, and may be replaced by HBPM in communities where ABPM is not available. Figure 1 shows the flowchart for the diagnosis of SAH.
Table 2

Blood pressure classification according to measurements taken at the office for individuals older than 18 years

ClassificationSBP (mm Hg)DBP (mm Hg)
Normal≤ 120≤ 80
Prehypertension121 – 13981 – 89
Stage 1 hypertension140 – 15990 – 99
Stage 2 hypertension160 – 179100 – 109
Stage 3 hypertension≥ 180≥ 110

When SBP and DBP are in different categories, the highest should be used to classify BP.

Systolic hypertension is considered isolated if SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg, and it should be classified into stages 1, 2 and 3. SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure. Source: 7th Brazilian guideline for arterial hypertension management, 2016.[1]

Figure 1

Flowchart for the diagnosis of arterial hypertension. BP: blood pressure; ABPM: ambulatory BP monitoring; HBPM: home BP monitoring; SBP: systolic BP; DBP: diastolic BP.

Blood pressure classification according to measurements taken at the office for individuals older than 18 years When SBP and DBP are in different categories, the highest should be used to classify BP. Systolic hypertension is considered isolated if SBP ≥ 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg, and it should be classified into stages 1, 2 and 3. SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure. Source: 7th Brazilian guideline for arterial hypertension management, 2016.[1] Flowchart for the diagnosis of arterial hypertension. BP: blood pressure; ABPM: ambulatory BP monitoring; HBPM: home BP monitoring; SBP: systolic BP; DBP: diastolic BP. The ABPM enables the identification of circadian BP changes, especially those related to sleep. In ABPM, BP is considered increased when BP in 24 hours ≥ 130/80 mmHg, ranging from wakefulness ≥ 135/85 mm Hg to sleep ≥ 120/70 mmHg. For HBPM, BP is considered elevated when ≥ 135/85 mmHg.[1]

Recommended technique for measuring blood pressure

Initially the patients should be informed about the procedure, and the steps on Table 3 should be followed.[3,10,11] Blood pressure should be measured by all health professionals on every clinical assessment and at least once a year.
Table 3

Recommended technique for measuring office blood pressure by using the auscultatory method

BP should be measured with a validated, calibrated and accurate sphygmomanometer, with cuff size adequate to arm circumference (according to the manufacturer's recommendation): usually cuff width close to 40% and cuff length covering 80-100% of arm circumference.
The cuff should be placed snugly, 2-3 cm above the cubital fossa, with its compressive part centralized on the brachial artery, and the arm supported at heart level.
The patient should rest at a calm environment for 5 minutes, sitting in a chair with back supported, legs uncrossed and feet on the floor. The patient should be relaxed, having neither exercised in the previous 30 minutes, nor consumed tobacco, alcohol or energetic foods (including coffee) in the previous 1 hour.
In addition, BP will be measured after 2 minutes in the supine position with the arm supported, especially for diabetics and the elderly, and when orthostatic hypotension is suspected. It is worth noting that measuring BP in the sitting position will be useful for therapeutic decision-making, while that in the orthostatic position, for treatment changes in case of orthostatic hypotension.
The cuff should be inflated rapidly up to 30 mm Hg above the level the radial pulse can no longer be palpated, and then deflated at approximately 2 mm Hg/beat. SBP will be determined by auscultation of the first sound (Korotkoff phase I), and DBP, by disappearance of the sounds (Korotkoff phase V). If the heart beats persist until level zero, determine DBP on the muffling of sounds (Korotkoff phase IV).
The first reading should be discarded, and two sequential readings in both members should be taken, the highest one being recorded. If arrhythmia is present, more measurements should be taken to determine mean BP.
Record the BP reading obtained for the patient. Reassess BP levels at least monthly until control is achieved, and then every 3 months.

BP: blood pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure.

Recommended technique for measuring office blood pressure by using the auscultatory method BP: blood pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure.

Clinical assessment and risk stratification

Complementary assessment is aimed at detecting target-organ damage (TOD), aiding cardiovascular risk stratification and identifying signs of secondary SAH. Table 4 shows the recommended complementary tests (routine and for specific populations).
Table 4

Recommended complementary tests (routine and for specific populations)

Routine tests for all hypertensive patients
UrinalysisFasting glycemia and HbA1c
eGFRTotal cholesterol, HDL-C and serum triglycerides
Conventional ECGSerum levels of creatinine, potassium and uric acid
Recommended tests to search for TOD in specific populations
Chest X rayClinical suspicion of cardiac and/or pulmonary impairment. Aortic dilatation or aneurysm (if echocardiogram is not available). Suspicion of aorta coarctation.
EchocardiogramEvidence of LVH on ECG or patients with clinically suspected HF. LVH = LV mass corrected for BS ≥ 116 g/m2 (men) or 96 g/m2 (women)
AlbuminuriaDiabetic hypertensive patients, with metabolic syndrome or at least two RF. Normal values < 30 mg/24h.
Carotid USCarotid murmur, CbVD signs, atherosclerotic disease in other sites. IMT values > 0.9 mm and/or atherosclerotic plaques.
Renal US or DopplerPatients with abdominal masses or abdominal murmurs.
Exercise testSuspicion or family history of CAD, DM.
Brain MRIPatients with cognitive disorders and dementia. Detection of silent infarctions and micro hemorrhages.

HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; TOD: target-organ damage; ECG: electrocardiogram; LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy; HF: heart failure; LV: left ventricular; BS: body surface; RF: risk factors; US: ultrasonography; CbVD: cerebrovascular disease; IMT: intima-media thickness; CAD: coronary artery disease; DM: diabetes mellitus; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

Recommended complementary tests (routine and for specific populations) HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; TOD: target-organ damage; ECG: electrocardiogram; LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy; HF: heart failure; LV: left ventricular; BS: body surface; RF: risk factors; US: ultrasonography; CbVD: cerebrovascular disease; IMT: intima-media thickness; CAD: coronary artery disease; DM: diabetes mellitus; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging. Target-organ damage should be investigated with the complementary tests shown in Table 4, in addition to the following exams: Left ventricular hypertrophy, assessed on electrocardiogram: Sokolow-Lyon index [S in V1 + R in V5 or V6 (whichever is larger)] > 35 mm; RaVL > 1.1 mV; Cornell index [S in V3 + R in aVL > 28 mm (men), and S in V3 + R in aVL > 20 mm (women)]; or on echocardiogram: left ventricular mass index ≥ 116 g/m2 (men), and ≥ 96 g/m2 (women); Atherosclerotic disease in other sites and chronic kidney disease ≥ stage 3 [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2] (Table 5).
Table 5

Stratification based on risk factors, target-organ damage and cardiovascular or kidney disease

 SBP 130-139 or DBP 85-89Stage 1 SAH SBP 140-159 or DBP 90-99Stage 2 SAH SBP 160-179 or DBP 100-109Stage 3 SAH SBP ≥ 180 or DBP ≥ 110
No risk factorNo additional riskLow riskIntermediate riskHigh risk
1-2 risk factorsLow riskIntermediate riskHigh riskHigh risk
≥ 3 risk factorsIntermediate riskHigh riskHigh riskHigh risk
Presence of TOD, CVD, CKD or DMHigh riskHigh riskHigh riskHigh risk

BP: blood pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; SAH: systemic arterial hypertension; TOD: target-organ damage; CVD: cardiovascular disease; CKD: chronic kidney disease; DM: diabetes mellitus. Source: 7th Brazilian guideline for arterial hypertension management, 2016.[1]

Stratification based on risk factors, target-organ damage and cardiovascular or kidney disease BP: blood pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; SAH: systemic arterial hypertension; TOD: target-organ damage; CVD: cardiovascular disease; CKD: chronic kidney disease; DM: diabetes mellitus. Source: 7th Brazilian guideline for arterial hypertension management, 2016.[1] Risk stratification should consider the classical RF, relating them to BP levels as shown in Table 5. The following risk factors are considered: male sex and age (men > 55 years and women > 65 years); smoking habit, dyslipidemia (triglycerides > 150 mg/dL; LDL-C > 100 mg/dL; HDL-C < 40 mg/dL), obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2), abdominal obesity (abdominal circumference > 102 cm for men, and > 88 cm for women), diabetes mellitus, abnormal oral glucose tolerance test or fasting glycemia of 102-125 mg/dL, and family history of premature cardiovascular disease (men < 55 years, and women < 65 years).

Treatment

Blood pressure reduction is followed by a significant cardiovascular risk reduction, which is higher in individuals at high cardiovascular risk, with a relative residual risk reduction in the other individuals.[2,11] Non-pharmacological therapy with changes in lifestyle (CLS) should be initially implemented for all stages of SAH and for individuals with BP of 135-139/85-89 mmHg (Table 6). For stage 1 hypertensives at low or intermediate cardiovascular risk, management can start with CLS, and 3 to 6 months can be waited before deciding to start pharmacological treatment. For the other stages, antihypertensive agents should be initiated as soon as the diagnosis is established.
Table 6

Recommendations for the non-pharmacological treatment of arterial hypertension

MeasureRecommendations
Body weight controlMaintain BMI < 25 kg/m2 up to 65 years of age;
Maintain BMI < 27 kg/m2 after 65 years of age;
Maintain AC < 88 cm for women and < 102 cm for men.
Dietary patternAdopt a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, with a reduced amount of saturated fat.
The DASH (Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension) diet, with 2100 kcal/day as originally proposed, is the most used:
Fruits (portions/day)4-5
Vegetables (portions/day)4-5
Milk and dairy products < 1% fat (portions/day)2-3
Lean meat, fish and poultry (g/day)< 180
Oils and fats (portions/day)2-3
Seeds and nuts (portions/week)4-5
Added sugars (portions/week)< 5
Salt (portion/day)~ 6 g (3000 mg of sodium)
Whole grains (portions/day)6-8
Moderate alcohol consumptionLimit daily alcohol consumption to 1 dose for women and low-weight individuals, and 2 doses for men.
Physical activityFor all hypertensives – population recommendation – physical activity practice
Moderate, continuous (1 x 30 min) or cumulative (2 x 15 min or 3 x 10 min) physical activity (similar to walking): at least 30 min/day, 5 to 7 days/week.
Aerobic training
At least 3 times/week (ideally 5 times/week), minimum of 30 min (ideally 40 to 50 min); Several modalities: walking, running, dancing, swimming; Moderate intensity defined as: higher intensity that still allows talking (no breathlessness), and sensation of mild to moderate tiredness; Maintain training heart rate (THR) between the lower and upper THR calculated as follows: Lower THR = (maximum HR – resting HR) x 0.5 + resting HR*; upper THR = (maximum HR – resting HR) x 0.7+ resting HR* Ideally, the HR used to calculate the intensity of the aerobic training should be determined on a maximum exercise test, with patients on their usual medication. *Maximum HR: obtained either on a maximum exercise test with regular medications, or by calculating maximum HR estimated according to age (220 - age; not to be used for individuals with heart disease or hypertensives on beta-blockers or nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers). Resting HR: measured after a 5-minute rest, lying down.
Resistance training
2 - 3 times/week, 8 - 10 exercises for the large muscle groups, prioritizing unilateral execution, when possible; 1 - 3 sets with 10 - 15 repetitions up to moderate fatigue (reducing the movement velocity and avoiding apnea, exhaling during contraction and inhaling when returning to the initial position); Long passive pauses: 90 - 120 s.

BMI: body mass index; AC: abdominal circumference. Source: Adapted from the 7th Brazilian guideline for arterial hypertension management, 2016.[1]

Recommendations for the non-pharmacological treatment of arterial hypertension BMI: body mass index; AC: abdominal circumference. Source: Adapted from the 7th Brazilian guideline for arterial hypertension management, 2016.[1] A BP target lower than 130/80 mm Hg is recommended for patients at high cardiovascular risk, including those with diabetes mellitus, and lower than 140/90 mm Hg for stage 3 hypertensives. For patients with coronary artery disease, BP should not be lower than 120/70 mm Hg because of the risk of coronary hypoperfusion, myocardial damage and cardiovascular events. For elderly hypertensives ≥ 80 years, BP levels should be lower than 145/85 mm Hg. Special attention should be paid to patients with dark skin phenotype who will benefit more from the use of calcium-channel blockers.[12-14] Figure 2 shows the pharmacological approach to SAH.
Figure 2

Flowchart for the treatment of arterial hypertension. (adapted from Malachias et al[1])

CV: cardiovascular; BP: blood pressure; ACEI: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin-receptor blocker; CCB: calcium-channel blocker.

Flowchart for the treatment of arterial hypertension. (adapted from Malachias et al[1]) CV: cardiovascular; BP: blood pressure; ACEI: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin-receptor blocker; CCB: calcium-channel blocker. When angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are not tolerated, they should be replaced with low-cost angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB). Beta-blockers should be considered for young individuals intolerant to ACEI and ARB, lactating women, individuals with increased adrenergic tone, and those with IHD or heart failure (HF). In case of intolerance to calcium-channel blockers (CCB) because of edema, or HF or suspected HF, diuretics can be used: thiazide diuretics (chlorthalidone - 12.5-25 mg 1X day; indapamide - 1.5-2.5 mg 1X day). Individuals with dark skin phenotype should have ARBs rather than ACEIs for pharmacological combinations.[2,11-14] Approximately two thirds of the patients will need combinations of at least two drugs to control BP. The advantage of the association is the synergism of different mechanisms of action, with dose reduction and consequent decrease in adverse effects, in addition to higher therapeutic adherence. There is no preference for a therapeutic class of drug to treat a hypertensive patient with a previous stroke, but a BP lower than 130/80 mm Hg should be targeted. Table 7 depicts the clinical situations with indication for or contraindication to specific drugs. For chronic kidney disease, ACEI and ARB reduce albuminuria, and thiazide diuretics are used for stages 1 to 3, while loop diuretics, for stages 4 and 5.[2,11-14]
Table 7

Clinical situations with indication for or contraindication to specific drugs

Drugs with specific indication
Clinical situationInitial therapy indicated
Heart failureACEI/ARB, diuretics and BB
AMI, angina pectoris, percutaneous or surgical myocardial revascularizationACEI/ARB, BB, ASA, statins
Diabetes mellitusThiazide diuretics, ACEI/CCB, BB
Chronic renal failureACEI/ARB, loop diuretics
Metabolic syndromeCCB, ACEI/ARB
Aortic aneurysmBB
Peripheral arterial diseaseACEI, CCB
PregnancyMethyldopa, CCB
Contraindicated drugs
Clinical situationContraindicated therapy
Asthma and chronic bronchitisNon-cardioselective BB
PregnancyACEI, ARB
AV blockBB, nondihydropyridine CCB
GoutDiuretics
Bilateral stenosis of the renal arteryACEI, ARB

ACEI: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin-receptor blocker; CCB: calcium-channel blocker; BB: beta-blockers; AMI: acute myocardial infarction; ASA: acetylsalicylic acid; AV: atrioventricular.

ACEI and ARB should not be associated, because of the ONTARGET study. Adapted from[2,4]

Clinical situations with indication for or contraindication to specific drugs ACEI: angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin-receptor blocker; CCB: calcium-channel blocker; BB: beta-blockers; AMI: acute myocardial infarction; ASA: acetylsalicylic acid; AV: atrioventricular. ACEI and ARB should not be associated, because of the ONTARGET study. Adapted from[2,4]

Arterial hypertension in pregnancy

Pregnant women with uncomplicated chronic hypertension should have BP levels lower than 150/100 mmHg, but DBP should not be < 80 mmHg.[1,2,11-14] The use of ACEI and ARB is contraindicated during pregnancy, and atenolol and prazosin should be avoided. Methyldopa, beta-blockers (except atenolol), hydralazine and CCBs (nifedipine, amlodipine and verapamil) can be safely used.[2,11-14] In chronic gestational hypertension with TOD, BP levels should be maintained under 140/90 mmHg, and the pregnant woman should be referred to a specialist for proper care during delivery and to avoid teratogenicity. Delivery should not be hastened if BP < 160/110 mmHg (with or without anti-hypertensive drugs) up to the 37th week. The fetal growth and amount of amniotic fluid should be monitored with ultrasonography between the 28th and 30th weeks and between the 32nd and 34th weeks, and with umbilical artery Doppler. During delivery, BP levels should be monitored continuously.[1,2,12-14] During the puerperium period, BP levels should be maintained under 140/90 mmHg, preferably with the following drugs, whose use is safe during lactation: hydrochlorothiazide, spironolactone, alpha-methyldopa, propranolol, hydralazine, minoxidil, verapamil, nifedipine, nimodipine, nitrendipine, benazepril, captopril and enalapril.[1,2,12-15] Preeclampsia (PE) is defined by the presence of SAH after the 20th gestational week, associated with significant proteinuria or presence of headache, blurred vision, abdominal pain, low platelet count (< 100,000/mm3), elevation of liver enzymes (twice the baseline level), kidney impairment (creatinine > 1.1 mg/dL or twice the baseline level), pulmonary edema, visual or cerebral disorders and scotomas. Eclampsia occurs when grand mal seizure associates with PE. The use of magnesium sulfate is recommended to prevent and treat eclampsia, at an attack dose of 4-6 g IV for 10-20 minutes, followed by infusion of 1-3 g/h, usually for 24 hours after the seizure. In case of relapse, 2-4 g IV can be administered. The use of corticosteroids, IV anti-hypertensives (hydralazine, labetalol) and blood volume expansion are recommended. Patients should be admitted to the intensive care unit.[1,2,11-15] Table 8 lists the reasons for not achieving proper BP control. It is worth noting the importance of ruling pseudoresistance out (WCH).
Table 8

Possible reasons of not achieving proper blood pressure control

Inadequate adherence to medications, diet, physical activity practice, and consumption of salt, tobacco and alcohol.
Associated conditions: overweight and obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic pain, blood volume overload, chronic kidney disease, thyroid disease.
Drug interaction: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, anabolic steroids, sympathomimetic drugs, decongestants, amphetamine, erythropoietin, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, licorice, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.
Suboptimal therapeutic regimen, low doses of drugs, inappropriate combinations of anti-hypertensive drugs, renal sodium retention (pseudotolerance).
Secondary hypertension: renovascular disease, primary hyperaldosteronism, pheochromocytoma.

Source: Leung et al.[11]

Possible reasons of not achieving proper blood pressure control Source: Leung et al.[11]

Secondary arterial hypertension

The prevalence of secondary SAH in the hypertensive population is around 3-5%. The most common cause of secondary SAH is renal parenchymal disease, responsible for 2-5% of the SAH cases. The adrenal causes of SAH and pheochromocytoma occur in less than 1% of all cases of SAH. However, 80% of the patients with Cushing's syndrome have SAH. Physicians must keep a high level of clinical suspicion when managing hypertensives of difficult control. Table 9 lists the clinical findings of the major etiologies of secondary SAH, associating them with the complementary tests that should be used to establish the diagnosis.
Table 9

Causes of secondary SAH, signs and complementary diagnostic tests

Clinical findingsDiagnostic suspicionAdditional studies
Snoring, daytime sleepiness, MSOSAHSBerlin questionnaire, polysomnography or home respiratory polygraphy with at least 5 episodes of apnea and/or hypopnea per sleep hour
RAH and/or hypopotassemia (not necessary) and/or adrenal nodulePrimary hyperaldosteronism (adrenal hyperplasia or adenoma)Measurements of aldosterone (> 15 ng/dL) and plasma renin activity/concentration; aldosterone/renin > 30. Confirmatory tests (furosemide and captopril). Imaging tests: thin-sliced CT or MRI
Edema, anorexia, fatigue, high creatinine and urea, urine sediment changesKidney parenchymal diseaseUrinalysis, eGFR calculation, renal US, search for albuminuria/proteinuria
Abdominal murmur, sudden APE, renal function changes due to drugs that block the RAASRenovascular diseaseRenal Doppler US and/or renogram, angiography via MRI or CT, renal arteriography
Absent or decreased femoral pulses, decreased blood pressure in the lower limbs, chest X ray changesCoarctation of the aortaEchocardiogram and/or chest angiography via CT
Weight gain, decreased libido, fatigue, hirsutism, amenorrhea, 'moon face', 'buffalo hump', purple striae, central obesity, hypopotassemiaCushing's syndrome (hyperplasia, adenoma and excessive production of ACTH)Salivary cortisol, 24-h urine free cortisol and suppression test: morning cortisol (8h) and 8 hours after administration of dexamethasone (1 mg) at 12PM. MRI
Paroxysmal AH with headache, sweating and palpitationsPheochromocytomaFree plasma metanephrines, plasma catecholamines and urine metanephrines. CT and MRI
Fatigue, weight gain, hair loss, DAH, muscle weaknessHypothyroidism (20%)TSH and free T4
Intolerance to heat, weight loss, palpitations, exophthalmos, hyperthermia, hyperreflexia, tremors, tachycardiaHyperthyroidismTSH and free T4
Renal lithiasis, osteoporosis, depression, lethargy, muscle weakness or spasms, thirst, polyuriaHyperparathyroidism (hyperplasia or adenoma)Plasma calcium and PTH
Headache, fatigue, visual disorders, enlarged hands, feet and tongueAcromegalyIGF-1 and GH levels at baseline and during oral glucose tolerance test

MS: metabolic syndrome; OSAHS: obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome; RAH: resistant arterial hypertension; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; US: ultrasonography; APE: acute pulmonary edema; RAAS: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; ACTH: adrenocorticotropin; AH: arterial hypertension; DAH: diastolic arterial hypertension; TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone; PTH: parathormone; IGF-1: insulin-like growth factor type 1; GH: growth hormone. Source: Malachias et al.[1]

Causes of secondary SAH, signs and complementary diagnostic tests MS: metabolic syndrome; OSAHS: obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome; RAH: resistant arterial hypertension; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; US: ultrasonography; APE: acute pulmonary edema; RAAS: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; ACTH: adrenocorticotropin; AH: arterial hypertension; DAH: diastolic arterial hypertension; TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone; PTH: parathormone; IGF-1: insulin-like growth factor type 1; GH: growth hormone. Source: Malachias et al.[1] Similarly to CNCD, lifelong adherence to the SAH treatment is poor. In the first year, 40% of the patients quit regular treatment, which prevent them from profiting from a reduction in both TOD and cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke. The following factors are related to non-adherence to treatment: adverse effects, number of daily doses and drug tolerance. Fixed drug combinations increase adherence by enabling better individual adequacy, reducing the likelihood of irregular use of daily doses. The involvement of patients and families, as well as a multidisciplinary approach enhance adherence to treatment. The use of interactive apps that increase the participation of patients in BP control is suggested to encourage their persistence and regular medication use.[16]
  10 in total

1.  Hypertension in pregnancy: the NICE guidelines.

Authors:  C W G Redman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  New NICE guidelines for hypertension.

Authors:  L D Ritchie; N C Campbell; P Murchie
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-09-07

3.  Management of hypertension: summary of NICE guidance.

Authors:  Taryn Krause; Kate Lovibond; Mark Caulfield; Terry McCormack; Bryan Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-08-25

4.  Guidelines on the management of arterial hypertension and related comorbidities in Latin America.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Hypertension Canada's 2017 Guidelines for Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults.

Authors:  Alexander A Leung; Stella S Daskalopoulou; Kaberi Dasgupta; Kerry McBrien; Sonia Butalia; Kelly B Zarnke; Kara Nerenberg; Kevin C Harris; Meranda Nakhla; Lyne Cloutier; Mark Gelfer; Maxime Lamarre-Cliche; Alain Milot; Peter Bolli; Guy Tremblay; Donna McLean; Karen C Tran; Sheldon W Tobe; Marcel Ruzicka; Kevin D Burns; Michel Vallée; G V Ramesh Prasad; Steven E Gryn; Ross D Feldman; Peter Selby; Andrew Pipe; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Philip A McFarlane; Paul Oh; Robert A Hegele; Milan Khara; Thomas W Wilson; S Brian Penner; Ellen Burgess; Praveena Sivapalan; Robert J Herman; Simon L Bacon; Simon W Rabkin; Richard E Gilbert; Tavis S Campbell; Steven Grover; George Honos; Patrice Lindsay; Michael D Hill; Shelagh B Coutts; Gord Gubitz; Norman R C Campbell; Gordon W Moe; Jonathan G Howlett; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Ally Prebtani; Gregory Kline; Lawrence A Leiter; Charlotte Jones; Anne-Marie Côté; Vincent Woo; Janusz Kaczorowski; Luc Trudeau; Ross T Tsuyuki; Swapnil Hiremath; Denis Drouin; Kim L Lavoie; Pavel Hamet; Jean C Grégoire; Richard Lewanczuk; George K Dresser; Mukul Sharma; Debra Reid; Scott A Lear; Gregory Moullec; Milan Gupta; Laura A Magee; Alexander G Logan; Janis Dionne; Anne Fournier; Geneviève Benoit; Janusz Feber; Luc Poirier; Raj S Padwal; Doreen M Rabi
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).

Authors:  Paul A James; Suzanne Oparil; Barry L Carter; William C Cushman; Cheryl Dennison-Himmelfarb; Joel Handler; Daniel T Lackland; Michael L LeFevre; Thomas D MacKenzie; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Sandra J Taler; Raymond R Townsend; Jackson T Wright; Andrew S Narva; Eduardo Ortiz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Adherence to drugs that prevent cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis on 376,162 patients.

Authors:  Sayed H Naderi; Jonathan P Bestwick; David S Wald
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: a pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19·1 million participants.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redon; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad; Josep Redon; Anna Dominiczak; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Peter M Nilsson; Michel Burnier; Margus Viigimaa; Ettore Ambrosioni; Mark Caufield; Antonio Coca; Michael Hecht Olsen; Roland E Schmieder; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Denis L Clement; Antonio Coca; Thierry C Gillebert; Michal Tendera; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Stefan D Anker; Johann Bauersachs; Jana Brguljan Hitij; Mark Caulfield; Marc De Buyzere; Sabina De Geest; Geneviève Anne Derumeaux; Serap Erdine; Csaba Farsang; Christian Funck-Brentano; Vjekoslav Gerc; Giuseppe Germano; Stephan Gielen; Herman Haller; Arno W Hoes; Jens Jordan; Thomas Kahan; Michel Komajda; Dragan Lovic; Heiko Mahrholdt; Michael Hecht Olsen; Jan Ostergren; Gianfranco Parati; Joep Perk; Jorge Polonia; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Lars Rydén; Yuriy Sirenko; Alice Stanton; Harry Struijker-Boudier; Costas Tsioufis; Philippe van de Borne; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Massimo Volpe; David A Wood
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 29.983

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Updated Cardiovascular Prevention Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology - 2019.

Authors:  Dalton Bertolim Précoma; Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira; Antonio Felipe Simão; Oscar Pereira Dutra; Otávio Rizzi Coelho; Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar; Rui Manuel Dos Santos Póvoa; Isabela de Carlos Back Giuliano; Aristóteles Comte de Alencar Filho; Carlos Alberto Machado; Carlos Scherr; Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca; Raul Dias Dos Santos Filho; Tales de Carvalho; Álvaro Avezum; Roberto Esporcatte; Bruno Ramos Nascimento; David de Pádua Brasil; Gabriel Porto Soares; Paolo Blanco Villela; Roberto Muniz Ferreira; Wolney de Andrade Martins; Andrei C Sposito; Bruno Halpern; José Francisco Kerr Saraiva; Luiz Sergio Fernandes Carvalho; Marcos Antônio Tambascia; Otávio Rizzi Coelho-Filho; Adriana Bertolami; Harry Correa Filho; Hermes Toros Xavier; José Rocha Faria-Neto; Marcelo Chiara Bertolami; Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez; Andrea Araújo Brandão; Audes Diógenes de Magalhães Feitosa; Celso Amodeo; Dilma do Socorro Moraes de Souza; Eduardo Costa Duarte Barbosa; Marcus Vinícius Bolívar Malachias; Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso de Souza; Fernando Augusto Alves da Costa; Ivan Romero Rivera; Lucia Campos Pellanda; Maria Alayde Mendonça da Silva; Aloyzio Cechella Achutti; André Ribeiro Langowiski; Carla Janice Baister Lantieri; Jaqueline Ribeiro Scholz; Silvia Maria Cury Ismael; José Carlos Aidar Ayoub; Luiz César Nazário Scala; Mario Fritsch Neves; Paulo Cesar Brandão Veiga Jardim; Sandra Cristina Pereira Costa Fuchs; Thiago de Souza Veiga Jardim; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Jamil Cherem Schneider; Marcelo Heitor Vieira Assad; Sergio Emanuel Kaiser; Ana Maria Lottenberg; Carlos Daniel Magnoni; Marcio Hiroshi Miname; Roberta Soares Lara; Artur Haddad Herdy; Cláudio Gil Soares de Araújo; Mauricio Milani; Miguel Morita Fernandes da Silva; Ricardo Stein; Fernando Antonio Lucchese; Fernando Nobre; Hermilo Borba Griz; Lucélia Batista Neves Cunha Magalhães; Mario Henrique Elesbão de Borba; Mauro Ricardo Nunes Pontes; Ricardo Mourilhe-Rocha
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  The Freedom of Clinicians and the Art of the Impossible.

Authors:  Hugo Madeira
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in Brazilians with arterial hypertension and/or diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Luma de Oliveira Comini; Laura Camargo de Oliveira; Luiza Delazari Borges; Heloísa Helena Dias; Clara Regina Santos Batistelli; Emily de Souza Ferreira; Luciana Saraiva da Silva; Tiago Ricardo Moreira; Glauce Dias da Costa; Rodrigo Gomes da Silva; Rosângela Minardi Mitre Cotta
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Variation in hypertension clinical practice guidelines: a global comparison.

Authors:  Richu Philip; Thomas Beaney; Nick Appelbaum; Carmen Rodriguez Gonzalvez; Charlotte Koldeweij; Amelia Kataria Golestaneh; Neil Poulter; Jonathan M Clarke
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Scientometrics on interventions used for adherence of hypertension and diabetes therapies.

Authors:  Julio de Souza Sá; Lucas França Garcia; Marcelo Picinin Bernuci; Mirian Ueda Yamaguchi
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-12-13

6.  Do we AGREE on the targets of antihypertensive drug treatment in older adults: a systematic review of guidelines on primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Jonathan M K Bogaerts; Leonie M von Ballmoos; Wilco P Achterberg; Jacobijn Gussekloo; Sven Streit; Milly A van der Ploeg; Yvonne M Drewes; Rosalinde K E Poortvliet
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  The New Paradigm of Blood Pressure Measurement.

Authors:  Marcus Vinicius Bolivar Malachias
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.000

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.